DC Tom Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 I appreciate the sarcasm, but...he still hasn't released them, and he allegedly didn't release them because they showed he paid no taxes and had ties to Russia +/- other foreign governments. That wasn't sarcasm: the story is that Trump hasn't released his taxes. MSNBC's silliness last night was only intended to keep that story alive. Because running a story on two pages of a 12 year old tax return that shows he pays a higher effective tax rate than the geniuses reporting it can't serve any other purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richstadiumowner Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 The "Lets-Get-HIM!!!" media are stupid. White House Correspondent April D. Ryan. So in 2005 @POTUS was not a Billionaire. He made in 2005 over 100 million dollars.— AprilDRyan (@AprilDRyan) March 15, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 That wasn't sarcasm: the story is that Trump hasn't released his taxes. MSNBC's silliness last night was only intended to keep that story alive. Because running a story on two pages of a 12 year old tax return that shows he pays a higher effective tax rate than the geniuses reporting it can't serve any other purpose. And of course they totally misrepresent the rate. It's not even the 24% rate that they all reported. The effective rate is actually greater than 100%, because the tax rate is calculated on Taxable Income, not on the phantom income number that MSNBC glommed upon. Trump's 2005 taxable income was $31mil and he paid $36 mil in taxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 That wasn't sarcasm: the story is that Trump hasn't released his taxes. MSNBC's silliness last night was only intended to keep that story alive. Because running a story on two pages of a 12 year old tax return that shows he pays a higher effective tax rate than the geniuses reporting it can't serve any other purpose. People are idiots.....yes I know. The 1040 tells pretty much nothing. When someone said that's what Maddow said she had my reply was "a 12 year old return and I bet she doesn't even have the Schedules" That's where the real number are. But you think someone with the his wealth and business dealings is going to send a dirty return to the IRS?? WTF people??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 And of course they totally misrepresent the rate. It's not even the 24% rate that they all reported. The effective rate is actually greater than 100%, because the tax rate is calculated on Taxable Income, not on the phantom income number that MSNBC glommed upon. Trump's 2005 taxable income was $31mil and he paid $36 mil in taxes. I did not know that. Still, it sells to their core "Don't know the difference between income and assets" demographic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 15, 2017 Author Share Posted March 15, 2017 Wealth=Income. [/libtardunderstanding] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hank II Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 Making the rounds: A mosaic of Trump made entirely of crying liberals. that is awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 Making the rounds: A mosaic of Trump made entirely of crying liberals. All those crying Republicans hahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 18, 2017 Share Posted March 18, 2017 FLASHBACK : A Lot of People, Including Hillary Clinton, Said Trump Didn’t Pay His Taxes. They’ll get a pass from the Legacy Media though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 18, 2017 Share Posted March 18, 2017 Normally press averse Elizabeth Warren is warming up to reporters - via @LaurenDezenski http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/elizabeth-warren-press-media-reelection-236212 … Normally press averse ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 18, 2017 Share Posted March 18, 2017 All those crying Republicans hahaha I'm an independent so I don't know - which ones in the picture are Republicans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 19, 2017 Share Posted March 19, 2017 THIS IS CNN? CNN host Fareed Zakaria gets profane in uncensored Trump discussion. Appearing beside host Don Lemon on CNN Tonight in a discussion about the president’s unsubstantiated claims that President Obama wiretapped Trump Tower during the election, a frustrated Zakaria said Trump is “indifferent” to the truth before launching into a profanity-laced comment about the commander-in-chief. “He’s spent his whole life bulls———. He’s succeeded by bulls———. He has gotten the presidency by bulls———,” Zakaria said, uncensored. “It’s very hard to tell somebody at that point that bulls— doesn’t work, because look at the results, right?” This is the same Fareed Zakaria who was once suspended from CNN for plagiarism. Given that his suspension only lasted a couple of weeks, it seems that CNN has a pretty high tolerance level for bull ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 19, 2017 Share Posted March 19, 2017 That bad old media! That nasty old CBO Those awful old courts Our terrible allies in Europe The bad intelligence community! The mean ole Democrats The evil lying polling agencies The Parasitic federal government which enslaves us Can't even trust Fox News anymore Lying old NASA can't go to moon for all I care I only trust Trump and twitter account--and all his paid Propagandists Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted March 19, 2017 Share Posted March 19, 2017 I'm an independent so I don't know - which ones in the picture are Republicans? The hair, eyes, and chin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 The hair, eyes, and chin. Nothing ruins a joke like having to explain it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 (edited) FLASHBACK: Media Advocated for Obama’s Supreme Court Picks JOHN STOSSEL: Has the media gotten worse? Or am I just grouchier? As an aside...................how hilarious is it that Gator (a few posts above) did his usual kindergarten attempt at "satire' by criticizing posters for "complaining about the media"............in a thread about the Media's portrayal of Trump. Edited March 20, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Read an article earlier today and was amused by the juxtaposition of a pair of clickbaits at the bottom of the article. One was about Melania The other about Melanoma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 TAKING SIDES: Anti-Trump media: 91% coverage negative, 96% of donations to Hillary. Donna Brazile will “forever regret” doing thing she still insists she didn’t do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 TAKING SIDES: Anti-Trump media: 91% coverage negative, 96% of donations to Hillary. Donna Brazile will “forever regret” doing thing she still insists she didn’t do. Victims Conservatives are, wah wah cry cry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 Victims Conservatives are, wah wah cry cry They are so over-taxed and over-worked too! Ultimate victims of the media and The Man! ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts