Maury Ballstein Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 I'm interested to see their plan at QB assuming Tyrod is let go. My guess is a tire fire but we will see. Like the Steelers/Raiders/Ravens tire fires or worse ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 -The threat of an effective passing game opens up the running game -the threat of an effective running QB can open up the running back lanes, too The first one is more conducive to actually winning games Thank you. The ONLY way the Running game majorly regresses is if we have a QB that cant run snd a QB that cant throw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 No let's keep the guy who can't beat .500 teams because he can't pass and then Scott Law can tell us how great he is 39 more times. Hope it's brees per "whisper rumors". If not there are 4 qb's in the draft that will do. Yes, because a QB beats another team, all by himself. The fact that the QB had a great comeback against the fish only to have the defense blow it? Or the coach kicking on 4th and short. That is the QB's fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Gun Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 I'm interested to see their plan at QB assuming Tyrod is let go. My guess is a tire fire but we will see. OMG, the sky is falling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Yes, because a QB beats another team, all by himself. The fact that the QB had a great comeback against the fish only to have the defense blow it? Or the coach kicking on 4th and short. That is the QB's fault. I dont know maybe having the ball twice in his hands in overtime and failed to put points on board. Notice what Watson did after his comeback and the defense let up a score. Just marched the team right back down and scored again Lol, since when does Tyrod play defense? If there's a better option out there go get him. I don't see one given the list of available FA QBs and I don't see any of the QBs dropping to 10 in the draft. The logical thing to do would be keeping your offense intact and fixing the **** defense. But sounds like they are rebuilding everything. Good luck. I live how moving in from an AVG at best QB equals rebuilding and blowinf up by people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 (edited) Yes, because a QB beats another team, all by himself. The fact that the QB had a great comeback against the fish only to have the defense blow it? Or the coach kicking on 4th and short. That is the QB's fault. Last TT post on the "McDermott" thread from me because he's not a Bill unless he restructures due to poor play. Yes Miami game we was good. There were 16 games tho. Edited January 11, 2017 by Ryan L Billz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 (edited) So, for example, if they could improve to "average" in points per game allowed, would that suffice? They were terrible. They faced the 30th most difficult offensive schedule in the league (football outsiders' measure) and finished 26th according to FO. And that ranking DEFINITELY matches up with the proverbial eyeball test -- they were like swiss cheese against the relatively small number of decent to good offenses that they faced. Edited January 11, 2017 by dave mcbride Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jms62 Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Where wre they ranked in points allowed again? Fun with numbers.... Almost were TYROD is ranked in YPA.... So you are saying we had an average defense? Where would it rank without the GOOSEEGG to the Pats 3rd string QB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 I am seeing a lot of jumping to conclusions and freaking out because there were "reports" that McCoy MAY follow a guy that we haven't yet hired. Classic TBD You guys are crazy and I love it because I'm crazy too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Last TT post on the "McDermott" thread from me because he's not a Bill unless he restructures due to poor play. Yes Miami game we was good. There were 16 games tho. Miami also had like the 30th ranked D in the league Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 They were terrible. They faced the 30th most difficult offensive schedule in the league (football outsiders' measure) and finished 26th according to FO. And that ranking DEFINITELY matches up with the proverbial eyeball test -- they were like swiss cheese against the relatively small number of decent to good offenses that they faced. They weren't good overall. What was dramatic was the massive drop in production when Aaron Williams went out (which is unacceptable). FWIW, I had them at 20th in defensive points per game allowed, and when I factor in weighted scoring for yards per play allowed, first downs surrendered, and takeaways produced, I had them at 19th overall. If I were to factor in strength of schedule I could see them dropping a few spots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heitz Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 I'm interested to see their plan at QB assuming Tyrod is let go. My guess is a tire fire but we will see. You haven't mentioned that anywhere else in this (or any other) thread. We get it, you wan't them to keep TT. But just keep in mind, if they don't keep TT it doesn't AUTOMATICALLY spell disaster - and if they do keep him, there's no guarantee of success. Why don't you let things play out a bit before posting that we're doooooomed every other post... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 There may be more to the Tyrod benching. If they have had discussions about trading for a veteran QB then that team would need a QB in return, unless it's Romo. Could see Taylor traded. I found Taylor's comments about restructuring his contract strange, especially after being benched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Fun with numbers.... Almost were TYROD is ranked in YPA.... So you are saying we had an average defense? Where would it rank without the GOOSEEGG to the Pats 3rd string QB? You want to compare scoring and say 7th in leage blah blah trash defense Well defense was top 20 in the comparable stat for them. But now now want to talk YPA ok well where was defense ranked in YPA against them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Gun Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Fun with numbers.... Almost were TYROD is ranked in YPA.... So you are saying we had an average defense? Where would it rank without the GOOSEEGG to the Pats 3rd string QB? Where would Tyrod rank without the Miami game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Where would Tyrod rank without the Miami game? Where would he rank without his deep passes? Those are all flukes, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 I thought this was discussed. AW was in the lineup when Ryan Fitzpatrick took a **** on them in week 2. The defense looked good in the weeks that followed with AW in there thanks to the opponent(Ari, St. Louis, NE*, SF) Not because of AW. Yes, they had all of one bad game with Aaron in the lineup. They came back the following week and held the Cardinals' offense (9th in yards, 6th in points), to 16 points. If you didn't notice the enormous difference in the defense's ability to communicate and handle assignments once Aaron went out, then I'll be very surprised--you normally are more astute than that. And as I said, it is unacceptable that the defense is that reliant upon one guy (or even one position) to be effective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 How would a marriage between he and cardale look? Mccoy: Complex passing offense Cardale: Incredibly raw passer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Gun Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 I thought this was discussed. AW was in the lineup when Ryan Fitzpatrick took a **** on them in week 2. The defense looked good in the weeks that followed with AW in there thanks to the opponent(Ari, St. Louis, NE*, SF) Not because of AW. Oh I will. I'm merely predicting the likely outcome knowing the Bills and the current leadership there. IDK Nostradamus was a Bills fan. Where would he rank without his deep passes? Those are all flukes, right? Omg, ignorance is bliss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloFan68 Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 (edited) HC - Sean McDermott OC - McCoy DC - John Butler ST - Bobby April (????) Let's do this Buffalo - Go Bills!!!!! Edited January 11, 2017 by BuffaloFan68 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts