YoloinOhio Posted October 19, 2016 Author Share Posted October 19, 2016 Well if Dr Rodak said it then it must be true! Does he come back for the Bungals or the Jags?if ready, he can come back for Jags game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 What value do you believe drug users who have multiple children out of wedlock, who play at being "college educated" but whom in reality can't string together a coherent written sentence because they didn't have the intellectual integrity to take advantage of the resources offered by one of the better Universities in the country, and then talk down to hard working individuals about their "little jobs", outside of wearing the right laundry, have to society? And how does asking that question reduce my value? That's an awful large basket of assumptions you are making about someone who hurled an insult at someone insulting him. If you are implying that person is Sammy, I'm sure he pays a lot of taxes that benefit society - in theory anyway. What value does a mental midget sitting in their parents basement flinging insults on social media at a complete stranger who is out at a park with his family - someone who did nothing to that individual to deserve such antagonistic behavior- have to society? Because you believe that person must be a hard worker ? Just what about their actions make you think they must work hard ? They seem to have an awful lot of time to stalk people on social media - time they could be using with their intellectual integrity - to take advantage of resources available to them to get a better job , or maybe even get a job at all. I'd guess that without knowing either individual that Sammy probably makes a larger contribution to society than that moron insulting him for getting injured playing a game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Well if Dr Rodak said it then it must be true! Does he come back for the Bungals or the Jags? Curious if his next hot take is that he expects the bills to make the playoffs barring losing more games than they win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 That's an awful large basket of assumptions you are making about someone who hurled an insult at someone insulting him. If you are implying that person is Sammy, I'm sure he pays a lot of taxes that benefit society - in theory anyway. What value does a mental midget sitting in their parents basement flinging insults on social media at a complete stranger who is out at a park with his family - someone who did nothing to that individual to deserve such antagonistic behavior- have to society? Because you believe that person must be a hard worker ? Just what about their actions make you think they must work hard ? They seem to have an awful lot of time to stalk people on social media - time they could be using with their intellectual integrity - to take advantage of resources available to them to get a better job , or maybe even get a job at all. I'd guess that without knowing either individual that Sammy probably makes a larger contribution to society than that moron insulting him for getting injured playing a game. I'm not going to get into an argument with you about taxes benefiting society here, but if you'd like to venture down to PPP, I'd be happy to engage you on that topic. To the rest, I believe that the choice to use drugs, to have multiple children out of wedlock, to belittle individuals working hard to support their families, and to pay lip service to getting a meaningful education are things that are unacceptable in a moral society. You are free to disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWATeam Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I'm not going to get into an argument with you about taxes benefiting society here, but if you'd like to venture down to PPP, I'd be happy to engage you on that topic. To the rest, I believe that the choice to use drugs, to have multiple children out of wedlock, to belittle individuals working hard to support their families, and to pay lip service to getting a meaningful education are things that are unacceptable in a moral society. You are free to disagree. Tasker, how does society quantify an individuals value? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I'm not going to get into an argument with you about taxes benefiting society here, but if you'd like to venture down to PPP, I'd be happy to engage you on that topic. To the rest, I believe that the choice to use drugs, to have multiple children out of wedlock, to belittle individuals working hard to support their families, and to pay lip service to getting a meaningful education are things that are unacceptable in a moral society. You are free to disagree. What's wrong with having children out of wedlock? And what kind of drugs are we talking about, here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I'm not going to get into an argument with you about taxes benefiting society here, but if you'd like to venture down to PPP, I'd be happy to engage you on that topic. To the rest, I believe that the choice to use drugs, to have multiple children out of wedlock, to belittle individuals working hard to support their families, and to pay lip service to getting a meaningful education are things that are unacceptable in a moral society. You are free to disagree. Notice I said in theory.... Thank you for allowing me the freedom to disagree with you. Enjoy rooting for the Buffalo immorals on Sunday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Tasker, how does society quantify an individuals value? Multiple ways. If you're going to make the case that it comes down to earnings, I'm more than happy to preempt you by pointing out that Pablo Escobar's net worth was more than $50 billion in today's dollars. Notice I said in theory.... Thank you for allowing me the freedom to disagree with you. Enjoy rooting for the Buffalo immorals on Sunday. Sammy won't be playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWATeam Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Multiple ways. If you're going to make the case that it comes down to earnings, I'm more than happy to preempt you by pointing out that Pablo Escobar's net worth was more than $50 billion in today's dollars. Sammy won't be playing. Perfect comparison... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Quint Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Tasker, how does society quantify an individuals value? You only have worth if you have run small businesses and sold them. Thats it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 What's wrong with having children out of wedlock? From a societal perspective? Everything. The nuclear family is the bedrock of preventing poverty and creating economic mobility. And what kind of drugs are we talking about, here? The illicit mind altering kind. Perfect comparison... My point is that I could tell you were going to say that society defines a person's value through earnings, and I wanted to demonstrate the flaw in your reasoning. Mother Theresa of Calcutta has immense societal value, yet she was in poverty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I'm not going to get into an argument with you about taxes benefiting society here, but if you'd like to venture down to PPP, I'd be happy to engage you on that topic. To the rest, I believe that the choice to use drugs, to have multiple children out of wedlock, to belittle individuals working hard to support their families, and to pay lip service to getting a meaningful education are things that are unacceptable in a moral society. You are free to disagree. To be honest....NONE of this crap your spewing belongs on this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWATeam Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 From a societal perspective? Everything. The nuclear family is the bedrock of preventing poverty and creating economic mobility. The illicit mind altering kind. My point is that I could tell you were going to say that society defines a person's value through earnings, and I wanted to demonstrate the flaw in your reasoning. Mother Theresa of Calcutta has immense societal value, yet she was in poverty. Yes, we could spend all day pointing out ridiculous extremes (PPP 101). In general, how would you say that society quantifies an individuals value? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Can someone close this thread? It no longer has a single thing to do with whether or not Sammy returns this season, and I keep clicking it because there are new posts only to be disappointed that it's just TakeYouToTasker blowing smoke. Let him take his moral crusade against Watkins elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Can someone close this thread? It no longer has a single thing to do with whether or not Sammy returns this season, and I keep clicking it because there are new posts only to be disappointed that it's just TakeYouToTasker blowing smoke. Let him take his moral crusade against Watkins elsewhere. Agreed. Where's the Archie Bunker forum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stony Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Can someone close this thread? It no longer has a single thing to do with whether or not Sammy returns this season, and I keep clicking it because there are new posts only to be disappointed that it's just TakeYouToTasker blowing smoke. Let him take his moral crusade against Watkins elsewhere. ...not yet, just reading through it...oh wait, same as 3 days ago... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Quint Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 This thread has zero societal value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Yes, we could spend all day pointing out ridiculous extremes (PPP 101). In general, how would you say that society quantifies an individuals value? Society quantifies value in many different ways. You simply want to say it's quantified expressly in dollars in order that you can be dismissive of moral failings, and I'm providing you with examples the demonstrate that you're wrong. Obviously you dislike that, but it doesn't make your argument any better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Society quantifies value in many different ways. You simply want to say it's quantified expressly in dollars in order that you can be dismissive of moral failings, and I'm providing you with examples the demonstrate that you're wrong. Obviously you dislike that, but it doesn't make your argument any better. Dude. At this point, why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Can someone close this thread? It no longer has a single thing to do with whether or not Sammy returns this season, and I keep clicking it because there are new posts only to be disappointed that it's just TakeYouToTasker blowing smoke. Let him take his moral crusade against Watkins elsewhere. I understand that you don't like me, and that's fine; but you really should either just put me on ignore, or learn to live with the idea that people are going to post things you don't like, and that it's your problem and not theirs. Dude. At this point, why? Why not ask that of the individuals making the counter argument? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts