Doc Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Did Jonathan Williams have to appear in court earlier this month? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Rodak: Bills OLB Manny Lawson responded today for the first time to the NFL's confirmation that he is being investigated for a personal conduct policy violation, saying there was "no physical violence" in 2014 domestic incident in Arizona. "We'll see what the NFL has to say about it," Lawson added, saying there have been no other incidents since then. Maybe it was finally seen on game tape he had wrong color socks on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
What a Tuel Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Graham doesn't know what it's about. Neither does Lawson apparently. There's an investigation going on into some unknown event, occurring at an unknown date with unknown people (except Lawson) that may or may not yield a suspension. Awesome. And people wonder why we have a problem with stories such as this. There is no substance. It's a rumor and a "trust me". Maybe Graham is right, but there are no facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted August 28, 2016 Author Share Posted August 28, 2016 @MatthewFairburn Buffalo Bills LB Manny Lawson reacts to NFL investigation, possible suspension http://www.newyorkupstate.com/buffalo-bills/index.ssf/2016/08/buffalo_bills_lb_manny_lawson_reacts_to_nfl_investigation_possible_suspension.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 So the NFL has told him and told the bills they are investigating an incident but the league won't tell them which incident? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 So the NFL has told him and told the bills they are investigating an incident but the league won't tell them which incident? They do not want to give him time to destroy cell phone to get rid of evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vincec Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 So the NFL has told him and told the bills they are investigating an incident but the league won't tell them which incident? It appears so, and if it is it's totally absurd. In fact it's so outrageous that if it wasn't the NFL I would never believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 It appears so, and if it is it's totally absurd. In fact it's so outrageous that if it wasn't the NFL I would never believe it.good grief Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 (edited) It appears so, and if it is it's totally absurd. In fact it's so outrageous that if it wasn't the NFL I would never believe it. I'd assume the NFLPA would love nothing more than for all of this to be for nothing. Edited August 28, 2016 by The Wiz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 So the NFL has told him and told the bills they are investigating an incident but the league won't tell them which incident? Maybe we should merge this with the Kaepernick thread? This wouldn't be happening if the player was Kyle Williams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 It appears so, and if it is it's totally absurd. In fact it's so outrageous that if it wasn't the NFL I would never believe it. If they are dredging something up from nearly two years ago ya gotta wonder, why now ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris heff Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 What I don't understand is once the rumor is out there, why wouldn't the NFL clarify the situation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 What I don't understand is once the rumor is out there, why wouldn't the NFL clarify the situation?Possibly on a witch hunt is all I can think of. Why him? No clue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris heff Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Possibly on a witch hunt is all I can think of. Why him? No clue. The fact that the NFL is not saying anything has to be because of lawyers and lawyers can be dicks (no offense to any of you that are dicks). Just seems unfair to Manny and the Bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 The fact that the NFL is not saying anything has to be because of lawyers and lawyers can be dicks (no offense to any of you that are dicks). Just seems unfair to Manny and the Bills. LOLd does seem odd. Like he pissed someone off almost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 (edited) And people wonder why we have a problem with stories such as this. There is no substance. It's a rumor and a "trust me". Maybe Graham is right, but there are no facts. If Graham had realized that he "won the lottery being born white", he would never have published that story. Guess he missed that day in journalism school when they covered this.. Edited August 28, 2016 by Mr. WEO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuoteTheRaven83 Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 We have no front 7 for the first couple weeks. This is ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 We have no front 7 for the first couple weeks. This is ridiculous. That same cast of characters (with Manny instead of Hughes) just handed Washington's starters a whoopin' without their starting defensive backfield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 29, 2016 Share Posted August 29, 2016 We have no front 7 for the first couple weeks. This is ridiculous. Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted August 29, 2016 Share Posted August 29, 2016 Maybe they're investigating old game tape from 2014 - 2015 to determine if he might have had a personal foul in a game that wasn't called by the refs. Not enough personal fouls called on you could be a new League offense. They obviously need to conjure up some excuse to keep him off the field for at least one game, because you know... he has to pay his fair share. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts