Jump to content

Clinton Political Dynasty


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said:

Spoiler alert.  They'll do it on the 12th.

Because it would have been difficult to dispose of bodies?

  Assuming that Epstein handled no bodies the more they are handled the more opportunities to be seen by more pairs of eyes.  Until the last year or so Epstein was confident to the point that he felt nobody would ever see anything on the island in terms of bodies.  So from his perspective why handle the bodies more than you have to especially when the island is private property owned by him?

10 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

The out to out dimensions of a standard tennis court playing surface are 60x120 and the ‘line’ across the middle is the SHADOW of the net. Sheeesh! Not sure what the rest of this chatter is all about.

  It's over a tennis court that does not actually exist in the spot implied by Google Earth.  Why randomly impose an image over an open field?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Assuming that Epstein handled no bodies the more they are handled the more opportunities to be seen by more pairs of eyes.  Until the last year or so Epstein was confident to the point that he felt nobody would ever see anything on the island in terms of bodies.  So from his perspective why handle the bodies more than you have to especially when the island is private property owned by him?

His neighbor is the ocean for Pete's sake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

His neighbor is the ocean for Pete's sake.

  So what?  Maybe the guy had the tiniest amount of decency in terms of an earthen grave.  Maybe he was concerned that if thrown in the ocean the chance was there that some remains would float to the surface?  Don't know but maybe we will learn if Maxwell spills the beans on what took place there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

The out to out dimensions of a standard tennis court playing surface are 60x120 and the ‘line’ across the middle is the SHADOW of the net. Sheeesh! Not sure what the rest of this chatter is all about.

 

That shadow is exactly what I saw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  So what?  Maybe the guy had the tiniest amount of decency in terms of an earthen grave.  Maybe he was concerned that if thrown in the ocean the chance was there that some remains would float to the surface?  Don't know but maybe we will learn if Maxwell spills the beans on what took place there.

The guy clearly did terrible things for a long time.  Speculating about supposedly fake tennis courts and mass graves all based on satellite photos makes it easy for things to get swept under the rug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

The guy clearly did terrible things for a long time.  Speculating about supposedly fake tennis courts and mass graves all based on satellite photos makes it easy for things to get swept under the rug.

  Not really.  It would have been far easier to sweep it under the rug a few generations ago when the public did not have access to satellite images.  Further, most people would not be able to comprehend the idea of a a pedophile ring because it never got mentioned even in the most private of settings.  I would hope that the Feds turn that island upside down looking for evidence.  Obviously, it is bad for the kids to be mistreated but is bad for society as whole to let pedophilia go unchecked.  If Epstein gets forgotten about it will be a sad day for humanity and open the door for worse things to happen.  We want to think that we have evolved beyond the need for harsh punishment for even rather horrendous crimes but my feeling is if somebody receives capital punishment out of this it will send a message that you run the risk of losing your life if you dare tread far outside of societal norms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RochesterRob said:

  Assuming that Epstein handled no bodies the more they are handled the more opportunities to be seen by more pairs of eyes.  Until the last year or so Epstein was confident to the point that he felt nobody would ever see anything on the island in terms of bodies.  So from his perspective why handle the bodies more than you have to especially when the island is private property owned by him?

  It's over a tennis court that does not actually exist in the spot implied by Google Earth.  Why randomly impose an image over an open field?

:rolleyes:

The tennis court did exist when the satellite footage was taken.  It was recently taken down.

 

The question isn't "Why did google put a fake court there?"  It's "Why was the tennis court demolished?"  And before that, why was the weird-ass courtyard demolished for a tennis court?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Not really.  It would have been far easier to sweep it under the rug a few generations ago when the public did not have access to satellite images.  Further, most people would not be able to comprehend the idea of a a pedophile ring because it never got mentioned even in the most private of settings.  I would hope that the Feds turn that island upside down looking for evidence.  Obviously, it is bad for the kids to be mistreated but is bad for society as whole to let pedophilia go unchecked.  If Epstein gets forgotten about it will be a sad day for humanity and open the door for worse things to happen.  We want to think that we have evolved beyond the need for harsh punishment for even rather horrendous crimes but my feeling is if somebody receives capital punishment out of this it will send a message that you run the risk of losing your life if you dare tread far outside of societal norms.

I don't disagree with any of that but saying that a tennis court was photoshopped or a few mounds of dirt is obviously a burial site is ridiculous. When those things turn out wrong it is easier to make everything look like a conspiracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

:rolleyes:

The tennis court did exist when the satellite footage was taken.  It was recently taken down.

 

The question isn't "Why did google put a fake court there?"  It's "Why was the tennis court demolished?"  And before that, why was the weird-ass courtyard demolished for a tennis court?

  I was going off of DR's comments and perhaps he has information that most people do not have access to.  I also understand that images on Google Earth can get dated and what we might look at today might be altered or gone if we could actually be on site to verify.  If I misunderstood any of DR's comments then my apologies.

 

  Why was the tennis court demolished?  Don't know and if we are lucky Maxwell could shed some light on that.  The cynical side of me says maybe the demolition was done as prep work to pour concrete to hide evidence.  Maybe build a building over it so it is not so glaring.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RochesterRob said:

  I was going off of DR's comments and perhaps he has information that most people do not have access to.  I also understand that images on Google Earth can get dated and what we might look at today might be altered or gone if we could actually be on site to verify.  If I misunderstood any of DR's comments then my apologies.

 

  Why was the tennis court demolished?  Don't know and if we are lucky Maxwell could shed some light on that.  The cynical side of me says maybe the demolition was done as prep work to pour concrete to hide evidence.  Maybe build a building over it so it is not so glaring.  

 

And you completely ignored my deconstruction of DR's theory, above.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/20/2019 at 3:27 PM, DC Tom said:

It probably was a tennis court.  The real question is: what was it before it was a tennis court, but after it was a construction site.  A courtyard...with a berm around it blocking the view?  No shade, and no view, and no amenities, on a Caribbean island?  That is ***** weird.  And then...where'd the court go?

 

Packing -- missed all of this. :beer: 

 

Here's more from Google Earth: 

Image result for fake tennis court epstein island

 

Image result for fake tennis court epstein islandImage result for fake tennis court epstein island

 

I don't think it was ever really a tennis court personally. But if it was, your follow on questions are worthwhile. If it wasn't, then you have to ask what Google gets out of faking the image. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Packing -- missed all of this. :beer: 

 

Here's more from Google Earth: 

Image result for fake tennis court epstein island

 

Image result for fake tennis court epstein island

 

I don't think it was ever really a tennis court personally. But if it was, your follow on questions are worthwhile. If it wasn't, then you have to ask what Google gets out of faking the image. 

 

 

Man.......................that must be a B word for the ballboys

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Packing -- missed all of this. :beer: 

 

Here's more from Google Earth: 

Image result for fake tennis court epstein island

 

Image result for fake tennis court epstein islandImage result for fake tennis court epstein island

 

I don't think it was ever really a tennis court personally. But if it was, your follow on questions are worthwhile. If it wasn't, then you have to ask what Google gets out of faking the image. 

 

There's other sources of photo evidence that show a tennis court.  Relying on Google Earth to be the end-all and be-all of overhead imagery is actually ######ed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More on the above

 

The road not taken: Another FBI failure involving the Clintons surfaces

The Hill [DC], by John Solomon

 

Original Article

 

 

 

 

 

 Granny Maojackets’ Emails Are Back!

The more we learn about the Comey-era FBI, the more it seems as if it functioned as a subsidiary of the Democratic National Committee. The conclusion of this article questions “whether there are two systems of justice inside the FBI — one for the Clintons, and one for the rest of the country.”

 

Clinton apologists are fond of reminding everyone that they have never been indicted for anything. I’ve written for years that that is because they are very good criminals.

 

Maybe they’ve had more inside help than we knew.

 

 

Pretty sure the “maybe” is rhetorical.

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

And she's out of her mind.

Hillary is Lurking

by Richard K. Johnson

 

Original Article

 

Hillary Clinton, the Ma Barker of American politics, is still out hustling, still staying one step ahead of the law as she tries to weasel her way into the presidential sweepstakes.

 

She says she isn’t running in 2020, but, as we know too well, truth is a fungible commodity to a Clinton.

 

The signs don’t look good. She just announced a fundraiser for the DNC at her Washington D.C. mansion with tickets as high as $50,000 (scraps for the homeless in the dumpster out back). A couple of weekends ago she was at de Rothschild’s estate on Martha’s Vineyard -- go socialism! -- to celebrate Bill’s birthday

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/22/2019 at 2:06 PM, DC Tom said:

 

There's other sources of photo evidence that show a tennis court.  Relying on Google Earth to be the end-all and be-all of overhead imagery is actually ######ed.

 

It’s not a tennis court.  It’s far to large a space and doesn’t scale right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

And she's out of her mind.

Hillary is Lurking

by Richard K. Johnson

 

Original Article

 

Hillary Clinton, the Ma Barker of American politics, is still out hustling, still staying one step ahead of the law as she tries to weasel her way into the presidential sweepstakes.

 

She says she isn’t running in 2020, but, as we know too well, truth is a fungible commodity to a Clinton.

 

The signs don’t look good. She just announced a fundraiser for the DNC at her Washington D.C. mansion with tickets as high as $50,000 (scraps for the homeless in the dumpster out back). A couple of weekends ago she was at de Rothschild’s estate on Martha’s Vineyard -- go socialism! -- to celebrate Bill’s birthday

 

 

...LMAO!!.....more like Moms Mabley........

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

It’s not a tennis court.  It’s far to large a space and doesn’t scale right.

 

On 8/20/2019 at 6:27 PM, DC Tom said:

 

Actually, it's the perfect size for a tennis court.  That measures at about 85 feet by 37.5, by the scale at the lower right.  Which is well within the bounds of error of my measurement (with an index card on a computer screen).

 

And you should check other mapping sites.  https://tools.wmflabs.org/geohack/geohack.php?pagename=Little_Saint_James,_U.S._Virgin_Islands&params=18_18_0_N_64_49_30_W_type:isle

 

Acme shows a construction site - it's an early image, with the "temple" to the south not even shown.  Apple maps shows a weird little ugly courtyard-looking ***** thing (but the temple exists; it's later.)  Copernix has the same map as Google, but crisper (and the tennis court isn't lopsided - I know Google does some image cleanup, that's probably an artifact.)  Wikimapia has an accompanying description of the history of the courtyard (being crowsourced, take it for what it's worth).

 

 

Berms are also used for ammo dumps, radioactive waste disposal sites, airplane revetments.  And if you look at the northern side of Great St. James Island, to the north of Epsteins, you'll see a berm around another tennis court.  

 

It probably was a tennis court.  The real question is: what was it before it was a tennis court, but after it was a construction site.  A courtyard...with a berm around it blocking the view?  No shade, and no view, and no amenities, on a Caribbean island?  That is ***** weird.  And then...where'd the court go?

 

Need to look at TerraServer - they have the most recent satellite shots, and historical ones, too.  You'd get a better history of the place looking there.  But at $45/month, I'm not signing up without a GoFundMe page.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moms_Mabley

 

Jump to search

American comedian and actress

 

Moms Mabley
Jackie Moms Mabley 1968.JPG
Appearance on The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour
in 1968
Birth name Loretta Mary Aiken
Born (1894-03-19)March 19, 1894
Brevard, North Carolina
Died May 23, 1975(1975-05-23) (aged 81)
White Plains, New York
Medium vaudeville, television, stand-up, film
Nationality United States
Years active 1919–1975
Genres Social satire
250px-Pearl_Bailey_Moms_Mabley_The_Pearl
 
With the hostess on The Pearl Bailey Show (1971)

Loretta Mary Aiken (March 19, 1894 – May 23, 1975), known by her stage name Jackie "Moms" Mabley, was an American standup comedian. A veteran of the Chitlin' Circuit of African-American vaudeville, she later appeared on the Ed Sullivan Show and The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour.[1]

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Can you imagine as a man waking up next to her every morning?  You can almost give Bill a pass at least with those that were adults and consented.  Apologies to the ladies here. 

 

...I'd suffocate MYSELF with the pillow........and add a blue plastic bag for assured success.......

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Can you imagine as a man waking up next to her every morning?  You can almost give Bill a pass at least with those that were adults and consented.  Apologies to the ladies here. 

 

when do you surmise they never were an honest relationship ever again?

 

a week after Chelsea was born?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

Image


Yeah when I saw that... :blink:  That has to be more than a kevlar vest or body amour. It almost looks like a board worn backwards from her boobs down below her belt. 

And people B word about Trump? This could have been our President.  Shesh. 
 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Yeah when I saw that... :blink:  That has to be more than a kevlar vest or body amour. It almost looks like a board worn backwards from her boobs down below her belt. 

And people B word about Trump? This could have been our President.  Shesh. 
 

  That aside it looks like she has packed on a few pounds.  Almost like stress has had her at the fridge all hours of the day.  Whatever could she be stressed out about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

 

A President who would only be seen on television.  With friendly lighting, makeup, botox, and probably some deepfakes

 

and the media smooching her behind even more than 24/7

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...