Tiberius Posted December 23, 2015 Share Posted December 23, 2015 Women consumers, that is http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/12066820/New-Gender-Tax-study-shows-women-are-charged-more-for-being-woman.html A gender tax! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted December 23, 2015 Share Posted December 23, 2015 So women pay more for their clothes and beauty supplies than men do and you think this is a war on women? Seriously? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 23, 2015 Author Share Posted December 23, 2015 So women pay more for their clothes and beauty supplies than men do and you think this is a war on women? Seriously? You will take this seriously when Hillary starts leading boycotts of these places! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted December 23, 2015 Share Posted December 23, 2015 You will take this seriously when Hillary starts leading boycotts of these places! You've lost it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 23, 2015 Share Posted December 23, 2015 You will take this seriously when Hillary starts leading boycotts of these places! :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 23, 2015 Share Posted December 23, 2015 I doubt this is an issue for Hillary since she clearly spends all her money wearing men's clothing anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted December 23, 2015 Share Posted December 23, 2015 It's ridiculous that they call it a "gender tax". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 Sports equipment for women cost far less than the men's version. It's about the product. Despite what the feminists want us to believe, men and women do THINK (and prioritize) differently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 24, 2015 Author Share Posted December 24, 2015 It's ridiculous that they call it a "gender tax".It's perfect. Pithy and perfect way of describing it without losing the reader in needless detail. LAblilz will tell you, he was a journalist major. You need to keep your writing tight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 I doubt this is an issue for Hillary since she clearly spends all her money wearing men's clothing anyway No man would be caught dead wearing what she wears. I think she is being lobbied by the Broyhill furniture company who makes her pant suits from leftover couch fabric. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 It's perfect. Pithy and perfect way of describing it without losing the reader in needless detail. LAblilz will tell you, he was a journalist major. You need to keep your writing tight. It's not needless detail to characterize something as it really is. How can an issue be properly addressed if you treat it as something it isn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 24, 2015 Author Share Posted December 24, 2015 It's not needless detail to characterize something as it really is. How can an issue be properly addressed if you treat it as something it isn't?Peopleare smart enough to understand the comparison Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 Peopleare smart enough to understand the comparison Absolutely, and they're also smart enough to see it as a complete mischaracterization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 It's perfect. Pithy and perfect way of describing it without losing the reader in needless detail. LAblilz will tell you, he was a journalist major. You need to keep your writing tight. Simplistic presentation for simplistic minds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 Peopleare smart enough to understand the comparison So why do you think this is happening? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 I'm having a hard time figuring out their methodology for this survey. What products do they associate exclusively for each gender but have versions for the opposite sex? Fashion? -anything else? I would also like to point out that women often cross over to "men's" products, while men rarely do the same. Also, designers create items that mimic men's clothes created exclusively for women- boyfriend jeans (which is downright idiotic)- then charge more for it. Gullibility tax? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 I'm having a hard time figuring out their methodology for this survey. What products do they associate exclusively for each gender but have versions for the opposite sex? Fashion? -anything else? I would also like to point out that women often cross over to "men's" products, while men rarely do the same. Also, designers create items that mimic men's clothes created exclusively for women- boyfriend jeans (which is downright idiotic)- then charge more for it. Gullibility tax? I wonder if Bruce Caitlyn Jenner wishes he she could get the old prices for his her products. Unintended consequences are a B word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 I wonder if Bruce Caitlyn Jenner wishes he she xecould get the old prices for his her xerproducts. Unintended consequences are a B word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 Hillary supports the war on women, especially the women who slept with Bill - either consensually or by force. She attacked them with more vigor than she did the young girl in Arkansas that was raped by a client of hers whom she got off and laughed about. She pays her female employees 76% of what her male counterparts get paid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 I wonder if Bruce Caitlyn Jenner wishes he she could get thed prices for his her products. Unintended consequences are a B word. Her !@#$ is upset about paying high costs for hygiene products I doubt many here get the reference. also 'f you Gary. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts