Mojo44 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 no there isn't that QB out there. This may or may not be true. We'll find out during the off season. If that QB is not available are you in favor of taking a big cap hit, which would absolutely be the case, to get Revis and tie up all that money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 (edited) This may or may not be true. We'll find out during the off season. If that QB is not available are you in favor of taking a big cap hit, which would absolutely be the case, to get Revis and tie up all that money?if that QB is not available? Yes. They can afford to sign him to a 2 yr deal as well as bolster the OL. We already know the FA QBs. Unless some team is willing to trade a quality QB, not sure where one will come from. Edited February 3, 2015 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrod's Tailor Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 BTW, you should stop banging your head like that. You could hurt yourself. I always wear a helmet for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUSE Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 (edited) What are you talking about? Kiko is doing fine. He probably would have played in the Super Bowl if the Bills went. Do you have a link to prove this because I am not buying The last update was in November in the Bleacher Report ???? Not exactly trustworthy Edited February 3, 2015 by HOUSE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Trading for Revis, the return of Kiko and the defense mind Ryan could be the ingredients for the best defense ever. Better than the 85 Bears, better than the Ravens, the Best. How cool would that be? Ryan wants a Patriot killer defense. Thats see. What do you think it would take to get a guy who's a free agent? 4th round pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jokeman Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Trading for Revis, the return of Kiko and the defense mind Ryan could be the ingredients for the best defense ever. Better than the 85 Bears, better than the Ravens, the Best. How cool would that be? Ryan wants a Patriot killer defense. Thats see. Rex has daddy issues than as if he's going to make the best D he's going to have to develop something better than the '85 Bears yet with the rules favoring offense as they are now I don't see that happening anytime soon. I say no on Revis. Focus on keeping the D together and making the offense better in the red zone and running the ball and we could be a playoff team next year. As think Sammy healthy a full year and Robert Woods entering his important 3rd year helps the hope we also look to improve our TE situation(see a veteran to supplant Chandler and/or Lee Smith) should go a long ways in helping the passing game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NastyNateSoldiers Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Think about it this way fellas, What would the addition of Revis do for this Defense & team in general. I think if it was a stock it would sky rocket. Imagine the pressure it puts on opposing teams offense. Revis gives u that Dominick Hasek presence gets in your opposing teams heads. I guess the Bills thinking with this possible addition is they want to level the playing field and make the QB position irrelevant. If we can make your QB look bad we have the advantage because we are building ourselves to win without that franchise QB. The more I think of this the more it seems like a genius plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deadbeef Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Revis is 30 and is going to want a huge contract. How many elite years does he have left? Would he play corner for 3 then move to safety? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NastyNateSoldiers Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 (edited) Revis is 30 and is going to want a huge contract. How many elite years does he have left? Would he play corner for 3 then move to safety?I think his age matches up perfectly with our window with this team presently constructed. 3yr 45 mil should get the deal done. Guaranteed money is what players are looking for nowadays so if we offer him 25 million he will take it. There is no QB on this team or in free agency that gonna tie up our cap space anytime soon. So the next most logical way of building your team is by making everyone better around the QB. Adding Revis won't stop us from building our oline and RB core. We already have a young inexpensive wr core that is on the verge of being top notch. All we need now is a TE which we can add via free agency or the draft. With a couple of additions to this offense and the stellar D we will have we can compete for the title I'm on board. Get er done Dougie! Edited February 3, 2015 by NastyNateSoldiers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillsMagic1 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 We have very low salary at Wr,QB, RB and also OL so we can go a lot of different ways. What if we got Revis and Lynch?.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NastyNateSoldiers Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 We have very low salary at Wr,QB, RB and also OL so we can go a lot of different ways. What if we got Revis and Lynch?..Lynch or Ap would be a great fit in Romans scheme, I hope we get a true workhorse back this off-season. How would feel of we also added Greg Hardy on a cap friendly one yr prove it deal to replace Hughes, We can get Hardy & Revis for combined 17-18 mil. This would be much better then Hughes & Mckelvin for a combined 16mil ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
machine gun kelly Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Getting Revis means we lose Hughes. We already have a solid secondary unit, so I don't see how he's worth it, when we could use the money for Lupati on the O-Line, Julius Thomas for a TE, and so on. Spend on offense, and resign Hughes. Doesn't that make sense. If we can't get Foles, then we have to find one in the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tintonfallsbillsfan Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Adding Revis is a no brainer . He makes a huge impact. Having a good defense didn't win the Raider game. Having a great defense well that is another story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUSE Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Adding Revis is a no brainer . He makes a huge impact. Having a good defense didn't win the Raider game. Having a great defense well that is another story We won the Raiders game ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Don't the Pats have a team option on Revis? Knowing them....and knowing that they know there's a good chance he'd go to Buffalo, I bet they use the team option just to not let that happen. Plus they get Mayo back. They may do nothing significant in free agency so couldn't they afford him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Don't the Pats have a team option on Revis? Knowing them....and knowing that they know there's a good chance he'd go to Buffalo, I bet they use the team option just to not let that happen. Plus they get Mayo back. They may do nothing significant in free agency so couldn't they afford him? They have some significant ufas on their own team they need to sign: Danny Aiken, LS Akeem Ayers, DE/LB Jonathan Casillas, LB Patrick Chung, S Dan Connolly, G Stephen Gostkowski, K Devin McCourty, S Stevan Ridley, RB Shane Vereen, RB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate Angel Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Getting Revis means we lose Hughes. We already have a solid secondary unit, so I don't see how he's worth it, when we could use the money for Lupati on the O-Line, Julius Thomas for a TE, and so on. Spend on offense, and resign Hughes. Doesn't that make sense. If we can't get Foles, then we have to find one in the draft. Revis makes the team around him better, hughes looks better because of the team around him. You cannot compare a player that is one of the all time greats at his position to one that is a solid contributer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills Fan in MD Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 No no, Rex is going to trade for him anyway--because wouldn't that be, like, the best everrrr?! I see your point. Trading for him would be much betterrrr!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnbillsbacker Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Correct. And certainly the Pats wouldn't trade him to a team in their division. The Pats would trade him to anyone in the AFC East. They don't fear the bills, jets, or dolphins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Revis is on his 3rd team in 3 years--maybe headed for a 4th in 4 years. Why doesn't any team think he's worth keeping another year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts