Jump to content

Global warming err Climate change HOAX


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Like the old song says:

 

:oops:

 

There it is

 

 

 

According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities,

 

No. No, no, no, no, no. No, it hasn't.

 

And it's the same bull **** study you posted about at the top of this page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blood sucking ticks are spreading like crazy in the northeast now because of shorter winters and longer falls. Never had them in my yard before and laid down to read and there were some on my leg. I looked up some web sites and sure enough they are at record numbers.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/28/tick-populations-booming-due-to-climate-change

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blood sucking ticks are spreading like crazy in the northeast now because of shorter winters and longer falls. Never had them in my yard before and laid down to read and there were some on my leg. I looked up some web sites and sure enough they are at record numbers.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/28/tick-populations-booming-due-to-climate-change

tenor.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurts like an SOB to have to get a tick pulled off yer naughty bits.

 

 


One of Hall and Oates had been under the gun for Lyme disease for years, and when he went on Howard Stern (a great interview surprisingly) they brought out Richard to talk about tick removal from his body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurts like an SOB to have to get a tick pulled off yer naughty bits.

 

 

One of Hall and Oates had been under the gun for Lyme disease for years, and when he went on Howard Stern (a great interview surprisingly) they brought out Richard to talk about tick removal from his body.

hall hates deers because they spread ticks so much
Link to comment
Share on other sites

High in the 60's in WNY today, July 25th. This proves without a shadow of doubt that we are entering a cooling off period.

 

Every change in the temperature is due to global warning, it is the answer to the weather every single day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blood sucking ticks are spreading like crazy in the northeast now because of shorter winters and longer falls. Never had them in my yard before and laid down to read and there were some on my leg. I looked up some web sites and sure enough they are at record numbers.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/28/tick-populations-booming-due-to-climate-change

 

Maybe it we give enough of our money to third world countries for windmills we can bring back some ice and not have to worry about ticks.

 

http://www.newyorknature.net/IceAge.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TODAY IN THE ANNALS OF STUPID, CLIMATE EDITION

 

A group of “children” (as activist lawyers call their clients) filed a federal lawsuit a while ago claiming that a right to a stable climate should be enforced by judicial decree as a postulate of the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, and the federal district court judge in Oregon (figures) denied a motion to dismiss.

This lawsuit is so silly I didn’t bother to make note of it here. If the plaintiffs actually won this case, it would essentially mean the end of the Constitution. Are we really supposed to think that federal judges should supervise climate policy? It has worked so well in the case of public schools. More likely it is intended as a way of prying open the doors for trial lawyers to extract tobacco-settlement style exactions from the energy industry.

 

Guess who else thinks it is silly? The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which yesterday issued a stay on further proceedings at the trial court level pending review by the appeals court. If even the famously flaky 9th Circuit thinks you’re going too far. . .

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone please school me real quick on a question. I'm not that concerned about ice melting or the ocean and air temps raising slightly. But what about the 40 billion tons of carbon dioxide that gets released into the atmosphere every year? Won't this have a cumulative effect over 50 or 100 years?

Um...plants eat it. And, there is no shortage of plants. Ugh. Again?

 

Well, there's always "the science", which has been totally corrupted beyond all recognition. In 2 sentences: our atmosphere's CO2 sensitivity has been wildly overestimated to suit a political agenda. You dial it down, and: presto, every failed model starts to make statistical sense.

 

So, to answer your question directly? We literally have no idea what the difference between what 40 billion and 140 billion tons of CO2 will do. This planet has endure 4x the level of C02 we have today. What we do know is: the modeling that is "the science" so far has proven, beyond all doubt, that the climate is NOT as sensitive to CO2 as has been claimed. The empirical measurements prove it.

The proper usage is

 

Your a moran.

No, it's you're a maroon.

 

Finally, again, I ask: when are you all going to come to terms with the following 2 facts?

1. Global Warming is now the issue that Americans care least about

2. Now causatively based on #1, but also substantively: this is a dead political issue.

Edited by OCinBuffalo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Finally, again, I ask: when are you all going to come to terms with the following 2 facts?

1. Global Warming is now the issue that Americans care least about

2. Now causatively based on #1, but also substantively: this is a dead political issue.

 

I think Russia-Trump collusion might be number one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...