outsidethebox Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 I think Ladexter might be winning the arguement against DCTom. We might be watching a yuge upset!!! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 55 minutes ago, westside said: I think Ladexter might be winning the arguement against DCTom. We might be watching a yuge upset!!! ? Be careful, DC Tom has snatched victory from the hands of defeat before. Just a few weeks ago he pulled gator out of his ass just to prove he was a ****ty person. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Be careful, DC Tom has snatched victory from the hands of defeat before. Just a few weeks ago he pulled gator out of his ass just to prove he was a ****ty person. Sometimes I poke the, sometimes the bear pokes me....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 8 minutes ago, westside said: Sometimes I poke the, sometimes the bear pokes me....... You ashamed to admit who you poke? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: You ashamed to admit who you poke? Nawwww.....life without shame my man!!!! That's how I roll......? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 33 minutes ago, westside said: Nawwww.....life without shame my man!!!! That's how I roll......? Great !@#$ing show. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 (edited) http://www.gopusa.com/?p=52281?omhide=true Thirty years of continued false climate alarms have sounded since climate change scientists started making their cataclysmic predictions that global manmade pollutants will catastrophically rise global temperatures to the point of killing off crops, mankind and other species – not to mention diminishing habitable land by rising sea levels due to melting icecaps. Institute for Energy Research (IER) Founder and CEO Rob Bradley, Jr., considers a New York Times (NYT) story by Philip Shabecoff titled “Global Warming Has Begun” as ushering in three decades of continuous prophies that would go unfilled to the dismay of climate change activists around the world. “If the current pace of the buildup of these gases continues, the effect is likely to be a warming of 3 to 9 degrees Fahrenheit [between now and] the year 2025 to 2050,” Shabecoff wrote in his June 24, 1988, NYTpiece. “The rise in global temperature is predicted to … caus[e] sea levels to rise by one to four feet by the middle of the next century.” Joining the party That year, Shabecoff’s alarmism blaming industrialized society was buttressed by two scientists’ bogus predictions – a trend that has seen one ominous climate forecast after another fail … year after year. “[P]redictions made on that day – and ever since – continue to be falsified in the real world,” Bradley stressed in his report. “The predictions made by climate scientist James Hansen and Michael Oppenheimer back in 1988 – and reported as model projected by journalist Philip Shabecoff – constitute yet another exaggerated Malthusian scare, joining those of the population bomb (Paul Ehrlich), resource exhaustion (Club of Rome), Peak Oil (M. King Hubbert), and global cooling (John Holdren).” Edited August 13, 2018 by 3rdnlng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 On 8/10/2018 at 6:15 PM, B-Man said: DNC CONSIDERS REPEALING FOSSIL FUEL DONATION BAN AFTER ONLY TWO MONTHS. I’ll believe global warming is a crisis, when the people who tell me it’s a crisis start to act like it’s a crisis themselves Which gets more press, announcing the ban on big oil donations or voting to lift the ban? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 On 8/10/2018 at 6:12 PM, 4merper4mer said: So what exactly did cause the drought and civil war in Syria? Normal weather patterns. Once apon a time, that part of the world had 7 years of bountiful harvest, followed by 7 years of drought. If there is a drought, it MUST MUST MUST MUST MUST MUST be "because of" Algore's FRAUD. Meanwhile, the NYT officially received an F for getting SCHOOLED in climate science by LaDexter. On 8/11/2018 at 12:37 PM, westside said: I think Ladexter might be winning the arguement against DCTom. LMFAO! Winning isn't the word. Annihilating is.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 8 minutes ago, LaDexter said: Normal weather patterns. Once apon a time, that part of the world had 7 years of bountiful harvest, followed by 7 years of drought. If there is a drought, it MUST MUST MUST MUST MUST MUST be "because of" Algore's FRAUD. Meanwhile, the NYT officially received an F for getting SCHOOLED in climate science by LaDexter. LMFAO! Winning isn't the word. Annihilating is.... Annihilating logic, reasoning and common sense in the merits of argument and thought? Yes, I'd agree. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 DC Tom is trying to defend the two great frauds of our time. He is failing miserably. On the Warming Fraud, DC Tom believes three island chains are "sinking" because of "ocean rise," but nothing else is sinking, and never mind that all three island chains are right on the "lip" of the PROF, on the subduction side. DC Tom cheered when the "warmers" took the two and only two atmospheric temp readings, satellites and balloons, both of which showed no warming in highly correlated fashion, and fudged both with uncorrelated "corrections." DC Tom can't explain how Co2 thawed North America while it froze Greenland during the past million years. Wait, DC Tom now claims that Co2 clumped over NA and departed Greenland entirely... or something like that.... LOGIC, one aspect of intellect which Global Warmers LACK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 9 minutes ago, LaDexter said: DC Tom is trying to defend the two great frauds of our time. He is failing miserably. On the Warming Fraud, DC Tom believes three island chains are "sinking" because of "ocean rise," but nothing else is sinking, and never mind that all three island chains are right on the "lip" of the PROF, on the subduction side. DC Tom cheered when the "warmers" took the two and only two atmospheric temp readings, satellites and balloons, both of which showed no warming in highly correlated fashion, and fudged both with uncorrelated "corrections." DC Tom can't explain how Co2 thawed North America while it froze Greenland during the past million years. Wait, DC Tom now claims that Co2 clumped over NA and departed Greenland entirely... or something like that.... LOGIC, one aspect of intellect which Global Warmers LACK Read the entire thread and get back to me. And buy a new map, for Christ's sake. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 LMFAO!!!! Hey DC Tom, is Antarctica an ICE AGE right now??? LOL!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, LaDexter said: LMFAO!!!! Hey DC Tom, is Antarctica an ICE AGE right now??? LOL!!! You're attributing things to me that I never said, because you can't be bothered to know what I think, because you're too busy being incapable of reading a map to read the entire thread to find out what I think. Educate yourself or !@#$ off, you antisemetic shitburglar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 DC Tom was asked a simple question. DC Tom doesn't want to answer that question. Instead, DC Tom resorts to chosen CARD TOSSING..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 Just now, LaDexter said: DC Tom was asked a simple question. DC Tom doesn't want to answer that question. Instead, DC Tom resorts to chosen CARD TOSSING..... What question? "Is Antarctica an ICE AGE right now?" That wasn't a simple question. It wasn't even English. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 10 minutes ago, LaDexter said: DC Tom was asked a simple question. DC Tom doesn't want to answer that question. Instead, DC Tom resorts to chosen CARD TOSSING..... this is kinda between y'alllllllll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 Let us simplify the question so that those with a 4th grade scientific "understanding" can understand.... We are trying to define ICE AGE. Are ICE AGES continent specific??? HINT = check GREENLAND vs. NORTH AMERICA during the past million years.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 Just now, LaDexter said: Let us simplify the question so that those with a 4th grade scientific "understanding" can understand.... We are trying to define ICE AGE. No, we're not. We're still trying to define "subduction zone." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 DC Tom is still insisting that the tectonic plates bend at 90 degree angles when going under an adjacent plate.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 28 minutes ago, LaDexter said: DC Tom is trying to defend the two great frauds of our time. He is failing miserably. On the Warming Fraud, DC Tom believes three island chains are "sinking" because of "ocean rise," but nothing else is sinking, and never mind that all three island chains are right on the "lip" of the PROF, on the subduction side. DC Tom cheered when the "warmers" took the two and only two atmospheric temp readings, satellites and balloons, both of which showed no warming in highly correlated fashion, and fudged both with uncorrelated "corrections." DC Tom can't explain how Co2 thawed North America while it froze Greenland during the past million years. Wait, DC Tom now claims that Co2 clumped over NA and departed Greenland entirely... or something like that.... LOGIC, one aspect of intellect which Global Warmers LACK I'm confused, I'm thinking? So because I was thinking, is anything like Puerto Rico tippimg over...? 7 minutes ago, DC Tom said: No, we're not. We're still trying to define "subduction zone." Subduction zone is what I call my bedroom when a girl enters it 5 minutes ago, LaDexter said: DC Tom is still insisting that the tectonic plates bend at 90 degree angles when going under an adjacent plate.... 90 degrees is what a woman turns when she comes into the subduction zone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 22, 2018 Share Posted August 22, 2018 Shocker: U.S. leading all Paris Accord signatories in emissions reduction JAZZ SHAW Aug 21, 2018 6:01 PM Go figure.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 22, 2018 Share Posted August 22, 2018 6 minutes ago, B-Man said: Shocker: U.S. leading all Paris Accord signatories in emissions reduction JAZZ SHAW Aug 21, 2018 6:01 PM Go figure.......... But it's still our fault, because since we withdrew from the Paris Accords, no one else feels bound by them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 THE MASK COMES OFF: UN Appointed Climate Science Team Demands The End of Capitalism. , Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 12 minutes ago, B-Man said: THE MASK COMES OFF: UN Appointed Climate Science Team Demands The End of Capitalism. , That's not what the paper says. It's actually much, much loonier. It really sounds like background material Gene Roddenberry might have written for Star Trek, but much more science-fictiony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 On 8/21/2018 at 8:19 PM, B-Man said: Shocker: U.S. leading all Paris Accord signatories in emissions reduction JAZZ SHAW Aug 21, 2018 6:01 PM Go figure.......... Hot air, oh brother. And why why would you care? If it's the hoax you brain dead morons think it is, you should not care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 "This is not about truth, it is about plausible deniability" Dr. Michael Mann, on whether fudging data was somehow inconsistent with truth and quality science.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 Quote Climate Progress ✔@climateprogress Katrina survivors call for reproductive rights in face of climate change https://thinkprogress.org/katrina-survivors-call-for-reproductive-rights-in-face-of-climate-change-14269bc20549/ … 1:42 PM - Aug 31, 2018 Wow............how "woke" can you get. Jeremy Deaton writes: When disaster strikes, pharmacies may be shut down, limiting access to contraceptives, leading to unplanned pregnancies. Likewise, hospitals may be closed, leaving pregnant people without the care they need. Finally, abortion clinics may be inaccessible, leaving those who have lost a job or home or suffered physically or emotionally as the result of a catastrophic storm without a means to terminate a pregnancy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 I rather like the implication that "surviving" a hurricane lends some sort of extra legitimacy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 2 hours ago, B-Man said: Wow............how "woke" can you get. Jeremy Deaton writes: When disaster strikes, pharmacies may be shut down, limiting access to contraceptives, leading to unplanned pregnancies. Likewise, hospitals may be closed, leaving pregnant people without the care they need. Finally, abortion clinics may be inaccessible, leaving those who have lost a job or home or suffered physically or emotionally as the result of a catastrophic storm without a means to terminate a pregnancy. The next time I hear anyone complaining about "reproductive rights" I'm telling them to buy solar panels. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 Mother Jones: Flushing Your Contacts Does Terrible Things to Our Land and Oceans. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 3 hours ago, B-Man said: Mother Jones: Flushing Your Contacts Does Terrible Things to Our Land and Oceans. . So the earth just becomes Earth + contact lenses. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 14 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: So the earth just becomes Earth + contact lenses. With better vision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dude Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 This is embarrassing. This climate change denial is flat earth / anti-vaxer stuff. The science is simple -- why don't we freeze at night? Because greenhouse gasses act as a blanket trapping heat in. So, if you add to those gasses, it's like piling on another blanket while in bed -- you're going to get hotter. It's almost like this whole debate started because somebody got pissed that they're not allowed to just toss their used motor oil in the local water supply. Yes, we know for a fact climate change is a thing that needs no intervention of man. We all know that. Archaeology tells us this when we find bronze age civilizations far from fresh water -- they weren't far from fresh water when they were a thing. Additionally, the climate of the middle east was more mild. Climate change helped spark the French Revolution. That's an undisputed fact. Climate change can be naturally occurring and man made. One being right does not invalidate the other. Currently, we should embrace environmental laws more than we are. It's really not up for debate....unless of course you wanna debate the earth being flat, and the "fact" that the universe is geocentric cause it obviously is! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 https://www.westernjournal.com/after-dumping-paris-accords-us-leads-world-reduction-carbon-emissions/ While supporters of the Paris Agreement panned the Trump administration’s decision to withdraw from the multinational climate agreement, those who backed that move are pointing to evidence that indicates the U.S. is nevertheless leading the world in carbon emissions reduction. The Daily Wire cited the recent BP Statistical Review of Global Energy, which found America cut more than twice the amount of the air pollutant as Ukraine, which came in second. According to the data compiled last month, the carbon emissions in the U.S. during 2017 represented a drop of more than 42 million tons over the previous year. By comparison, Ukraine showed a reduction of roughly 20 million tons. Advertisement - story continues below Among several nations still committed to the terms of the Paris accords, the results are much less impressive. In Spain, Canada, China and the European Union, 2017 actually saw a spike in the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. Others, including the United Kingdom, Mexico and Japan, joined the U.S. and Ukraine in emitting significantly fewer pollutants. Regardless of any nation’s performance, the United Nations-negotiated accords did not provide for any mechanism that would make its terms binding. As a candidate and in office, President Donald Trump has frequently criticized the accords and moved last year to withdraw the U.S. Advertisement - story continues below In a June 2017 statement announcing his intention to abandon the agreement, Trump called it “simply the latest example of Washington entering into an agreement that disadvantages the United States to the exclusive benefit of other countries, leaving American workers — who I love — and taxpayers to absorb the cost in terms of lost jobs, lower wages, shuttered factories, and vastly diminished economic production.” The president went on to confirm that “the United States will cease all implementation of the non-binding Paris Accord and the draconian financial and economic burdens the agreement imposes on our country.” You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out. According to Trump, complying with the agreement constituted “onerous energy restrictions,” citing research that showed it “could cost America a much as 2.7 million jobs by 2025.” Months later, reports indicated the U.S. might be considering a negotiation that would reintroduce the nation into the accords. A White House statement shortly thereafter, however, put any such speculation to rest. “There has been no change in the United States’ position on the Paris agreement,” the statement read. “As the president has made abundantly clear, the United States is withdrawing unless we can re-enter on terms that are more favorable to our country.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 18 minutes ago, The_Dude said: Climate change can be naturally occurring and man made. Relax, you two! New Shimmer is a floor wax AND a delicious dessert topping! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 3 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: Relax, you two! New Shimmer is a floor wax AND a delicious dessert topping! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dude Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 23 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: Relax, you two! New Shimmer is a floor wax AND a delicious dessert topping! Hey look, it’s just something I see on the regular. I do. I see people say ‘since climate change has happened without the burning of fossil fuels, the burning of fossil fuels has nothing to do with global warming.’ So, you’re joke is funny — but I encounter a lot of flawed thinking. I really believe we need to put philosophy back into schools to some degree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 44 minutes ago, The_Dude said: This is embarrassing. This climate change denial is flat earth / anti-vaxer stuff. The science is simple -- why don't we freeze at night? Because greenhouse gasses act as a blanket trapping heat in. No... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dude Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 5 minutes ago, DC Tom said: No... Tom, are you retarded? Seriously. Crayons, do you eat them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts