Jump to content

Good, Bad & The Ugly...Week 1


LabattBlue

Recommended Posts

He dd slip entirely too much.

 

But I didn't expect McKelvin to make the catch, just like I never expected Winfield to make INTs . Very good cover guys, Bad hands.

 

McKelvin also made a few very good tackles today for what it's worth.

Exactly, if they could catch they would be WRs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good: woods, graham

Bad: nitpicking, but the use of Watkins-- I expected him to get like 10 touches

Ugly: second half offense game plan

 

I don't want to come off as being weird but for me the most exciting play of the game was the incomplete long pass to a very open Watkins. Because of injuries Watkins and EJ have not worked together too much in the preseason and in practice. Once they get on the same page they will be able to connect on impactful plays. Watkins is going to be the receiver who will be drawing double coverage. He is going to open it up for the other receivers and also for Spiller.

 

The emphasis of not allowing the defenders to touch the receivers is killing the flow of the game.It is giving the offense too much of an advantage. After every incompleted pass there is an expectation that a penalty is going to be called. The lack of common sense and judgment by the referrees (as they are instructed to do) is something I find very odious.

Edited by JohnC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to come off as being weird but for me the most exciting play of the game was the incomplete long pass to a very open Watkins. Because of injuries Watkins and EJ have not worked together too much in the preseason and in practice. Once they get on the same page they will be able to connect on impactful plays. Watkins is going to be the receiver who will be drawing double coverage. He is going to open it up for the other receivers and also for Spiller.

 

The emphasis of not allowing the defenders to touch the receivers is killing the flow of the game.It is giving the offense too much of an advantage. After every incompleted pass there is an expectation that a penalty is going to be called. The lack of common sense and judgment by the referrees (as they are instructed to do) is something I find very odious.

Agreed, but I think if you watch it again, IMO he was not "wide open." He had a step on the defenders and a good pass is likely a completion if not TD, but he didnt get a couple yards past them til the ball was already overthrown. Still, I liked that play, too, and if anything, overthrowing him was much better than the alternative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do the negatives get too categories? Yes yes, I understand, Clint Eastwood.

 

But for the sake of compartmentalizing a game, can we begin a movement for The Great, The Good, The Bad and The Ugly? Please?

 

If the op has no issue with it sure. Here's mine

 

The great..Cordy Glenn (gave EJ time to get off to hot start)

The good..EJ and Woods

The bad...Scott Chandler (tight ends all over the league dominate and we have this schlub)

The ugly...Doug Marrones slacks game.

Edited by Ryan L Billz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the op has no issue with it sure. Here's mine

 

The great..Cordy Glenn (gave EJ time to get off to hot start)

The good..EJ and Woods

The bad...Scott Chandler (tight ends all over the league dominate and we have this schlub)

The ugly...Doug Marrones slacks game.

 

:lol:

 

He's a meaty man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know why he had 13 tackles? Because the guy he was covering, caught the ball over and over again! :doh: The one play he had a chance to make, the ball hit him in the hands and he dropped it.

His stripping of the ball and forcing of the fumble on Marshall completely changed the game. It may have been the biggest play of the game. There were a lot but that one was huge. The Bears would have had first down at our 28. Instead we had first down at their 46, and we kicked a FG which put us in the lead.

 

He did drop the ball, which he has to make that catch, but he also was in position to break up the pass, which he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His stripping of the ball and forcing of the fumble on Marshall completely changed the game. It may have been the biggest play of the game. There were a lot but that one was huge. The Bears would have had first down at our 28. Instead we had first down at their 46, and we kicked a FG which put us in the lead.

 

He did drop the ball, which he has to make that catch, but he also was in position to break up the pass, which he did.

Yep. I forgot, and give him credit for that play.

Edited by LabattBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The TD to Marshall, he lost his footing. Looks like a couple players had problems with it. Brown slipped on the first TD to Bennett.

 

The Chicago Park District always seems to be resodding Soldier, I wonder if that was the issue... Loose sod. It look great, but it isn't a baseball ballpark, it's gonna get tore up. You see what happened in Houston.

 

Good: I got drunk

Bad: Can't remember much

Ugly: Wife dunked me in the pool

 

Lucky: Wife didn't drown you and showed mercy.

 

;-P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only real complaint i have about this game that is actually quite scary is the lack of pass rush. The bears oline is nothing special and they lost two starters during game and we still couldnt get to cutler much. Thats a big concern if it continues.

 

I don't recall seeing them bring more than 4-5 people at any point... I recall seeing a S or LB blitz at times, but I think the fact that the Bears offense is so solid may have had a little to do with that plan... Add in no Gilmore and the loss of Rivers during the game...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bad...Scott Chandler (tight ends all over the league dominate and we have this schlub)

He's not elite but there are only a handful of guys dominating the league. Thomas, Gronk (when healthy), Davis and maybe Jordan. The rest are JAG like Chandler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not elite but there are only a handful of guys dominating the league. Thomas, Gronk (when healthy), Davis and maybe Jordan. The rest are JAG like Chandler.

I don't know if that is true. I would love to have a guy like Martellus Bennett we had yesterday, or Jordan Cameron, or even Zack Ertz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't know if that is true. I would love to have a guy like Martellus Bennett we had yesterday, or Jordan Cameron, or even Zack Ertz.

I mentioned Cameron as being elite. Chandler's numbers compare favorably to Bennett's. Ertz may turn out ok I'm just saying these guys don't grow on trees.

 

All that being said, I think the Bills are LONG over due for a difference maker at TE. They haven't even tried to address it in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So should we tar and feather Marrone for being so stupid to think that Hogan should play ahead of Woods and it was a complete waste of time that hurt the offense from gelling in preseason? Or should we say he was a genius for lighting a fire under Woods which clearly worked as he started to excel slightly afterwards?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

He's not elite but there are only a handful of guys dominating the league. Thomas, Gronk (when healthy), Davis and maybe Jordan. The rest are JAG like Chandler.

 

He's not elite but there are only a handful of guys dominating the league. Thomas, Gronk (when healthy), Davis and maybe Jordan. The rest are JAG like Chandler.

 

Yea but there's another 10 or so guys I would rather have based on upside. I like the young guys like McDonald on SF and Sefarian Jenkins on Tampa. ertz and celek witten vernon Davis among others.

 

Chandlers ok but wish he had a lil more athleticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So should we tar and feather Marrone for being so stupid to think that Hogan should play ahead of Woods and it was a complete waste of time that hurt the offense from gelling in preseason? Or should we say he was a genius for lighting a fire under Woods which clearly worked as he started to excel slightly afterwards?

 

Let's just blame Manuel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The three best runs of the day were by Jackson and then two by Boobie. Spiller I thought had a decent game even though his stats say he was ok.

 

To me the good was obviously Graham and Woods. Woods I think will lead the team in catches. Graham I think will stay on the field, it's a 3 CB league. With McKelvin and Gilmore coming back from injuries I believe they'll improve as year goes on. Graham will stay on field.

 

Bad, no adjustment to Forte or Bennett.

 

Ugly, that PI call on Williams was horrible. Also I get trying to get your best players the ball but I could do without Spiller returning kicks and was Jackson out on a punt return?

 

I'm used to the Bills losing that type of game. Solid road win, something to build on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's just blame Manuel.

That goes without saying. If EJ didn't have such slow eyes, or had ever thrown an accurate pass in his life, he wouldn't have thrown all those passes behind Woods or way over his head that Woods had to make spectacular catches on to regain his job. Woods should be kissing EJ's feet for getting his job back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ticky-tacky. Correct by a strict application of the rules.

 

The inconsistent strict application of the rules is what was truly bad.

 

That's my biggest complaint. How is a back to really know what he can do when the refs call ticky-tack stuff but leave more blatant fouls uncalled?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good: Win, Glenn owning Allen

 

Bad: EJ's throws where the receivers bailed him out. Woods and WIlliams both nearly got killed when they were wide open and had to reach for bad passes. EJ has to learn to control those throws.

 

Ugly: Personal foul call on Chandler. He simply pancake blocked the defender and probably just didn't hear the whistle. Potentially costed us 3 points

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought McKelvin played well. Hopefully Bradham helps and RT Henderson improves.

 

McKelvin was in position most of the time, he just needs more ball awareness. (same thing every year, although last season he had FANTASTIC ball awareness. hopefully just a one game fluke.).

 

The Great: Graham. This guy needs to stay in the lineup. I'm not sure we win the game with Gillmore playing instead of Graham IMO. I'm not saying start him over Gillmore, but somehow he should be in there.

 

The Bills actually played two games Sunday. One against "Da Bears" and the other against the zebra's.

 

and won both!!

Edited by RyanC883
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...