TPS Posted February 1, 2014 Share Posted February 1, 2014 Seems there are three camps with this draft: big target WR/TE, LB, or OT. I've flopped around the first two for awhile, but recently have been convinced by the OL camp. As I look at various mocks, I'm not so sure that Mathews or Robinson will be available, which has me looking at Lewan. I like what I've read about him, especially that he plays with a mean streak. I've noticed he's been moving up draft boards as well. Bottom line, I'd be fine with either of these 3 OTs at the 9th pick. Obviously, add in an upgrade at LG, and the bills have one heck of an OL, which helps both EJ and the D. Imagine CJ and FJ with a dominant line...can't wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 1, 2014 Share Posted February 1, 2014 I'm not sure I'd spend the pick on Lewan, but other than that I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFFALOTONE Posted February 1, 2014 Share Posted February 1, 2014 We don't need OTs! Where is this coming from? We almost lead the league in rushing! We need a big play WR or LB. Get some depth after round 4. We need playmakers badly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 There's equal talent along the lines available every year in the pick 25-45 region as there is in the top 10. Just say NO to fat guys at the top of the draft. Taking an OL that high is nothing more than a waste of a pick. How well have the teams like the fins, rams, and browns done after spending high picks on the OL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 We don't need OTs! Where is this coming from? We almost lead the league in rushing! We need a big play WR or LB. Get some depth after round 4. We need playmakers badly. And we were excellent in pass protection , right? A blind man could see we need an upgrade over Pears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM57 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 We don't need OTs! Where is this coming from? We almost lead the league in rushing! We need a big play WR or LB. Get some depth after round 4. We need playmakers badly. They nearly led the league in rushing because of volume, not because of productivity. Rushing more times than almost all other teams = rushing for more yards than most teams. Pears is aging, declining and overpriced. The end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Any three of these guys would be a good pick. Although I would trade down to pick Lewan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
808 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 i think having 2 bookend OTs would be sweet but taking a right tackle at 9 is kind of a bummer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kellyto83TD Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 WR, Then TE, then LB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM57 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 i think having 2 bookend OTs would be sweet but taking a right tackle at 9 is kind of a bummer. Tell that to the 49ers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
808 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Tell that to the 49ers you think we are a RT away from being that good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Section242 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Tell that to the 49ers Also took Crabtree and Davis at the top of the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM57 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 you think we are a RT away from being that good? No. Just saying you don't reach for need. Every position is important. Reaching to fill needs gets you Aaron Maybin and JP Losman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Yes we need an upgrade but you don't take a RT at #9. If they were to trade back to the 20's and take a RT, fine, but at #9 would rather see the WR or LB. And we were excellent in pass protection , right? A blind man could see we need an upgrade over Pears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM57 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Yes we need an upgrade but you don't take a RT at #9. If they were to trade back to the 20's and take a RT, fine, but at #9 would rather see the WR or LB. Anthony Davis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimBob2232 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 No thanks on Lewan. This guy is a disaster waiting to happen. Good player, but his "playing with a mean streak" goes too far for me. I see Incognito in him... I'd pass. If he falls to round 2-3 over this stuff, I'd take a shot...but not at #9. http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/bigten/2013/12/25/michigan-wolverines-offensive-tackle-taylor-lewan-questioned-alleged-assault/4199589/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 No thanks on Lewan. This guy is a disaster waiting to happen. Good player, but his "playing with a mean streak" goes too far for me. I see Incognito in him... I'd pass. If he falls to round 2-3 over this stuff, I'd take a shot...but not at #9. http://www.usatoday....ssault/4199589/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7if3VeSlgh0 He has more natural talent then Incognito. I would never pass up an OL for being too nasty. He is actually my favorite OL prospect in the draft for his nastiness. What I am concerned about are some inconsistencies in his play. But I think he will be someone that masters his craft as a pro. I would take him at 9 if some players Im targeting are gone, but would love to trade down and draft him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted February 2, 2014 Author Share Posted February 2, 2014 He has more natural talent then Incognito. I would never pass up an OL for being too nasty. He is actually my favorite OL prospect in the draft for his nastiness. What I am concerned about are some inconsistencies in his play. But I think he will be someone that masters his craft as a pro. I would take him at 9 if some players Im targeting are gone, but would love to trade down and draft him. agreed, that's the ideal. OTH, if Robinson or Mathews make it to 9, you take them there. I'm not sure why people are labeling Lewan a "RT", he is like the other two, who are projected to start at RT then transition to LT. He played LT at michigan. In today's nfl, with pass rushers being moved around a lot, you need two quality OTs. I've seen Lewan rated as high as 10. I saw an article on espn that he's moved up Kiper's board, but I don't get insider, so not sure how high he's moved up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 All I saw was Lewan and threw up .... This guy is a complete loser. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 All I saw was Lewan and threw up .... This guy is a complete loser. Sorry. Strong words Ohio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts