Jump to content

MDH

Community Member
  • Posts

    9,688
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MDH

  1. Fair catch at the 6. Ugh
  2. Im not a TT fan but this isnt on him. Its playcalling and protection. He actually looks pretty good when he has any pocket at all.
  3. So how about some 3 step drops and quick throws. A screen? No, lets keep dropping way back and getting sacked.
  4. Without turnovers this D just isnt good.
  5. OL looks like garbage in both run and pass game.
  6. I haven't read any of this thread but how many times has, "there's no such thing as a trap game" been uttered? Given that the thread is on it's 4th page I'm going to go with more than once per page: 5.
  7. HGH. It's how a 40 year old can recover like he's 25.
  8. I hear you. Ive stopped getting my hopes up no matter how quickly the Bills come out if the gate. Win @Jets and at home vs. the Saints and Ill believe. Even the Bills would have a hard time throwing a 7-2 record down the toilet with 2 games vs. the Phins and one vs. the Colts left on the schedule.
  9. There is no such thing as a safe place on the internet...
  10. He should have been booted from this game. That was the definition of flagerent.
  11. You do what the coach wants you to do. I rip TT all day long in Sundays but trying to blame him for a ridiculously stupid play call is a bit much. It makes one lose their credibility. I cant even fathom the reason for that call. 2 yards closer for an already short FG attempt?
  12. There is no overreacting to how bad that play call was. Any criticism of it is justified.
  13. Or it shows that playing the Bills offense throws the stats off because they struggle to score against everybody.
  14. The CB at the bottom of the shot (at the 40) has outside position. He also has no help underneath. Thats a throw he should make before WR even makes the cut.
  15. Goff looks pretty good throwing the ball to Watkins and Woods...
  16. On each of those shots I saw someone who had a bit of space but TY was generally too busy running around with his eyes on the rush instead of downfield.
  17. I want a QB who drops back, reads the D before he finishes his drop, plants his back foot and fires an accurate ball with confidence. Yeah, the WRs arent good but I dont remember the last time I saw TT do what I described. Hes hesitant, slow to read a D and his accuracy isnt good. But hey, he will make a nice run for a 1st down a couple of times a game and have the announcers say, thats what Tyrod brings to the table! Its not all TTs fault but hes not playing well. Theres plenty of blame to go around but the bottom line is hes good enough to get this team 6-7 wins each year and keep this team in QB purgatory. This front office got rid of the best offesnsive weapon the team had in the passing game while looking towards the future I wish theyd do the same and bench TT. Id rather lose the rest of the games with Peteman at the helm than win 7 with TT. Granted, I do realize this is a hard sell to the vets on the team but as a fan Id much prefer it.
  18. They use their WRs less than any other team because they have the worst WR corps in the league. That being said, I agree with your main point, adding a WR at this point wouldn't be the immediate gain that many are hoping for. It takes time to mesh with the offense/QB.
  19. Why is he a "d bag?
  20. My point is the stats are useless WITHOUT a reference point. What are you comparing them to in order to say they're good, bad, or average?
  21. Because unless you are going to do that for every single QB the numbers you obtain have no reference point. If you compare his massaged numbers to everybody else's real numbers that tells you nothing.
  22. Why is MMA "gay" but wrestling isn't?
  23. Brady QBing the Bills in the late 80 and into the 90s would have won multiple Super Bowls. That team might have gone down as the greatest ever with Brady at the helm.
  24. This is where I'm at too. I don't think Watson will be a quality NFL starter. That being said I'd still take him over TT. Just because I believe something doesn't mean it will be true and I'd rather roll the dice on a guy who might be good over a guy who won't be on the roster in 2 years.
  25. It should be? Give complete autonomy to a guy who has 0 games logged as a head coach? He might end up panning out but giving someone with that lack of experience complete control doesn't seem like the prudent move.
×
×
  • Create New...