chongli

Possibly, but he's only 29. And he still has a job to do.

And unfortunately, their curse ended with the Music City Miracle against us in 1999. Ugh.

The Packers lost three years in a row in the playoffs to the Cowboys from 1993-95 (plus four times in the regular season from 1993-96 to them), before winning the SB in 1996. (All seven games were at Dallas, btw.)

Yes. 25.

A positive: I believe Buffalo drafts first, before any of the other 3 teams who lost in the divisionals (Tennessee, Tampa Bay, Green Bay), at 25.

I posted this in another thread just now, but it's worth saying again: I believe Green Bay lost 3 consecutive NFC playoff games to Dallas from 1993-95, before winning the SB in 1996. Let's hope Buffalo can evetually shake KC.

I believe Green Bay lost 3 consecutive NFC playoff games to Dallas from 1993-95, before winning the SB in 1996. Let's hope Buffalo can evetually shake KC.

This loss rivals the Homerun Throwback vs. Tennessee and Wide Right. [Well, the playoff losses to the Bengals (both times), San Diego, and Cleveland in the 80's were pretty devastating too.]

Sarcasm?

Either that, or KC might/should have lost vs. Green Bay if they had had Rodgers. As it was, KC barely won facing Love at QB.

Well, I did find this from Watson's college days, lol: https://www.tigernet.com/forum/thread/Maybe-Deshaun-Watson-will-now-stop-the-arrogant-1407934 "Superman poses a la Cam Newton. A guy who is injured as often as Watson should learn humility. Let's hope he gets stronger both physically and psychologically. We sure do need him on the field."

Yep...maybe an edited title to warn readers.

I agree with your pics. I would only say Buffalo was just a minor disappointment, but things seem to be rolling now. But in that light, KC could be said to also be a minor disappointment, as they misfired earlier in the year and were expected to be the number one seed by many (they ended up number 2, but might (should?) have been even lower if Rodgers had been able to play against them with Green Bay, which means Buffalo might have been hosting KC in the divisional round).

Yeah, me too. Until I read into the seventh page. What a waste of time.

Interesting. Because in the 506 forum (NFL TV viewership geeks), they are debating the pros and cons of having the winner play Sunday vs. Saturday, and how they should have but an AFC game instead in the MNF wild card slot to avoid this scenario, like Buffalo-New England. As far as I know, it is still up in the air. Do you have a link for this? I apologize if I was wrong.

I am confident (but nervous), but I just wish this game were home.

Here is the video from yesterday: Here's a video of it being thrown out the first time, in 2016: It happened three time in 2018, with one fan being arrested:

LOL, ok good cause then! Yeah, "ad nauseum" is the correct term when speaking of most Pats* fans. 😄

Ugh, they have commercials from hell which are shown ad nauseum on NFL Network:

Not true on the last one (unless there was just a recent announcement by the NFL I am unaware of). The Arizona-LA winner could still play next Saturday if the NFL wants to feature Dallas (if they win) at Tampa Bay (if they win) on Sunday (both have huge national followings) and also wants to put an AFC game also on Sunday (Sundays have better TV ratings than Saturday). Probably won't happen, but it could, as the NFL has been known to do stranger things for ratings.

Sleeping. I sleep days. Go to bed around 9 AM. Plus, I am on the west coast, so the game starts at 5:30 PM for me.

You think that's unprofessional? Look at the actual red carpet on the tarmac rolled out for McD when he arrived in Buffalo for the first time: [at 0.05:]

Yeah, they would be a tough opponent. But...maybe I'm being a homer, but I predict a different outcome should we play them again.

Well, maybe KC loses in the first round, say to the Chargers or Colts. That also guarantees us a home divisional round game (assuming we win the East and finish in the 3 seed, as Cincy is resting their starters).