Jump to content

warrior9

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,061
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by warrior9

  1. The Knox drop early was atrocious though, when he would have gotten a first.
  2. I feel very certain that the Diggs catch was incredibly easy, the Knox pass had no defenders making a great play, the refs called the delay of game early. Daboll called a great game.... wonderful. Our run plays were very well designed.
  3. Both. Our running plays are sooo vanilla and everyone watching the game knows when we are running the ball. I formation? run. Josh under center? 80% chance we're running it. There's no creativity to our run game. Patriots create space with their run game. They had a game plan. They put 6 offensive linemen on the field for a TON of snaps and dared the Bills to stop them.. they didn't... so yeah McDaniels called a better game than Daboll. If you don't think so, I think you're incredibly football illiterate.
  4. Does this mean Daboll can do more lining up in I formation and run the best play from 1986? Just two backs through the hole and "tougher man wins"
  5. Levi has been more than fine for a long time. I don't get the hate. Does he give up more catches? Well, yeah because more balls are thrown his way since no one throws at Tre..... it's going to happen.
  6. Difference between Sanders and Brown: Sanders can get off the LOS against physical CBs. We saw it time and time again last year where Brown was abused at the line, ESPECIALLY in the AFCCG. Sanders can stretch the field and also beat zone with his savvy. One of the most underrated things that I've seen from Sanders: his blocking has been RIDICULOUS.
  7. Yeah I watched him throw it to RB's out of the backfield for 20 years (excluding the years he had Moss)
  8. I think that stuff is coming. Teams are also playing a lot more Man2. It'll open up game by game... you may see a ton of it this week and then not again for another 3. That's the one way I admire Daboll. His game plans vary drastically from week to week. What he did last week with Moss was masterful.
  9. You must be really fun to around at parties. Does putting your shoes on make you upset? Let's try and help you out: You probably won't see the numbers of 2020 Diggs ever again, even though he's a better player. What you will see if the emergence of Dawson Knox and Emmanuel Sanders BECAUSE of him. Emmanuel Sanders has been so good for us.... why? Not only is he a pro bowl player but Diggs causes the other team to shade a safety to his side. It's this weird thing called being good and having options. He's averaging 75 yards a game down from 95 which is 1 catch a game, essentially. Diggs is fine, our offense is number 1 in the league and we are tracking towards a historic season.... how the hell did some of you make it through the drought?
  10. Going to have to be Poyer/ Taron Johnson. Tackling in the secondary and coming up and filling willl be the difference maker. I think Groot is going to abuse their OL
  11. Packers, KC, or it may be a good time to use Miami?
  12. QB's use colors and numbers for a cadence to audible (the game has evolved so much that they just have names for plays now). They'll use it for when to snap the ball etc. For example: In the huddle Josh might say, "We're going to snap on blue and get them to jump" and use his normal "white 20" count to try and draw the other team offside. The center wont snap until he says "blue 20 set hut" In the past, maybe they had a run play called and they use the color "orange" for opposite. But again, the game has evolved so much that Josh would just yell "Hey gold whip, gold whip" and hes changing the play at the line.
  13. This is the third comment on this. Did people really not know he said "white 20 set" or "white 20 set hut" ? Every QB uses color number, color number prior to the snap. Unless it's an audible and they say Omaha Set (which omaha means, "snap on next sound")
  14. Yeah, I mean it would be enormous to get a win vs. KC this week. Moves us to 4-1 and them to 2-3. We still have Pats twice, Jets twice, Falcons, Jags on our schedule. It would a lot of making up for the Chiefs to catch us. The Titans game should be very winnable. They did have quite a few players out yesterday but their defense is full of holes.
  15. And we were a better defense 2 years ago with him playing as well.
  16. Tenn has a relatively weak defense. We should be able to put up a ton of points on them
  17. I think in game one, you could make the a case he did force a LOT down field.
  18. Yeah, i'd imagine rushing is somewhere between 450-550 and passing yards between 4450 and 4600. TD's from 37-45 ish
  19. Right right, however, if we're blowing teams out... it will be because of him and his numbers.
  20. I know the chatter has calmed down after his dominant performance last week, however, something I found interesting is the following: If you take his current stats and average them over 17 games, his numbers will look like this: ~4500 passing yards, 40 TDs, 6 INTs ~500 rushing yards, 6 TDs. I think it's safe to assume he's going to have more passing yards than 4500 because of how low his first two games really were and I genuinely think they were an anomaly. If his numbers end up being similar to this (this is similar to last year) with an extra game.... I think I'd call it a success.
  21. In what world is 51 pass attempts and 25 run attempts a 50/50 split? Wouldn't a 50/50 splits be 25 runs and 25 passes? or am I missing something.
×
×
  • Create New...