Jump to content

34-78-83

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,192
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 34-78-83

  1. Keepers - Kyle - Pay cut though? Humber - good depth Webb - Versatile depth Leonard Johnson - depth, good hitter One of - Taiwan Jones/Travaris Cadet - potential, special teams E.J Gaines - yes, but contract with incentives for time on the field Seantrel Henderson - All the measurables are there if he's got the crones mostly tamed. P Brown - only if he's cheap
  2. Sorry guys. I like aggressive play too, but McD has already established that WITH THIS CREW (talent level), he is always going to pack it in with a lead. It has worked and it makes some sense to do.
  3. I am disgusted by this as well, some of those posters in this very thread. Not even a tiny clue of what they are talking about and yet so damn sure about themselves.
  4. Which gets made up for by all the games we had more than a one score lead in and went into an offensive shell for the 4th and sometimes even 3rd quarter. It works both ways.
  5. Brave maybe, but really bad take OP. This staff did it with HALF the roster of the previous 3 seasons. And without the benefit of Brady not playing in a game. And with Peterman literally throwing away a game vs. the Chargers. And with a tougher schedule. McD AND McD staff >>>>>> Rex/Marrone and their staffs
  6. That's it! Its not hard... That's all they need to do. Enough of the other nonsense
  7. You're all the same. You call the people on the board who are actually in line with reality - (to sum it up yet one more time - Is our QB good enough? No. Is he the best thing we've got for the last 3 years and quite likely the last 18? Yes) TT apologists. You reply to a single line of an entire train of thought or discussion. Reading comprehension is a lost art and so is watching the rest of the league apparently.
  8. But remember man they're Realists, Hard Truthers, and know better, cuz Yardage!
  9. It really just comes down to putting someone on the field that is better. Until the Bills are legitimately able to start a quarterback that they acquire via ANY means that is better than TT, then he should be playing for them since he is the best qb we've had here in the drought, minus part of a season with an aging Bledsoe. Not sure why this concept escapes so many folks. You can B word about him all you like but until that occurs you are wasting your energy. The man has established flaws and also benefits he brings. There is no drawback to having him play until the future qb is ready. I hope that it's via the draft, but whatever they go with is fine, as long as they do make it a priority.
  10. Do some of these moron out of the woodwork posters today realize the the Bills are operating with the worst depth of talent in the entire league besides Cleveland? And it isn't really close. Do they realize that this current semblance of an O-line couldn't pass protect for anyone but TT, Cam, Watson and Wilson in this league? It is bloody amazing we are 8-7. No D-line depth, little LB talent, Very little WR talent, tragically thin at RB. A decent but flawed QB with a completely inexperienced backup. Basically a good secondary and a pretty good running game is our only claim to fame.
  11. Don, do you have a grudge with your source? Did he piss on your cheerios or get with a girlfriend of yours? I bet he'd be fumed at you if he saw all of this... And the Bills DO have people that scour forums and social media. These are the things I think about when I see your information. Is it worth going out on a limb for what amounts to general information that most would assume to be true/not true without a source? I have no real feeling one way or another on the validity, just trying to use common sense.
  12. Trying to stay as positive as possible for a team you are a fan (fanatic) of? BLASPHEMY! Why do that when you can put a safe, negative take on everything? It shows you are hard! and critical! and a "realist"! and "not gonna buy what they're selling"! and "not a schil"! and if they only listened to you, the team would be better off!
  13. Sal C brings more than all the others with the combo of having true knowledge of the game (with coaching experience) along with intelligent questions, conclusions and a personality that keeps it lively.
  14. LOL. PLUS , that's not an "in game decision". Double Fail.
  15. This thread still exists why?
  16. Shopp is perplexed... It's comical. Hmmm Dude, I wonder why all these millionaire coaches with millions atr stake don't agree with you Mike? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
  17. Odds are just odds based on the history of the whole league. They don't account for things like weather, field condition, how good of a push your O-line can get with no passing threat, the fact that the 3rd string QB who isn't really a QB is in, fatigue levels. I would have gone for the 1st down on 4th, but I can understand why we punted where we did with the wind and the time left.
  18. surprisingly good refereeing today? who woulda thought
  19. I don't care - this is the best thread today!
  20. I am as well. We'll know for sure the kid has worthy potential atleast once the switch happens, if done honestly.
  21. Not sure why folks are afraid of keeping the guy around another year until the draft prospect can beat him out, all while the team is getting better around them.
  22. whoah... Saw that yesterday and thought it was just my eyes. How the?
×
×
  • Create New...