Jump to content

34-78-83

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,186

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 34-78-83

  1. 34-78-83
    While that's mostly true, that still was his mindset and personality, and the Bills in '25 (as per the OP question) would never have someone like him in that room.
  2. 34-78-83
    It would never be Flutie with his team dividing locker room presence and tactics. Taylor has the perfect mentality for it and won’t lose the game with turnovers but won’t win you games on his own. Fitz could win you 2 out of 4, or 4 out of 9, with ups and downs. Guess I’d go with Taylor
  3. 34-78-83
    Thurman's first game and then his 200+ yard breakout! Good choices
  4. 34-78-83
    This random game was a blast! The "Rickey Williams game" in 2002. He goes for 200+ and we still destroy them in a winter wonderland setting.
  5. 34-78-83
    Sam Cowart. What could have been
  6. 34-78-83
    Umm … I‘ll just leave you to it if you believe that was a factor
  7. 34-78-83
    Riiiggghhhht stopping the run is what really matters and is keeping the Bills out of the superbowl year after year. C’mon be better.
  8. 34-78-83
    The Bills don’t and won’t use mammoth 1 T in their scheme. This guy can handle the run just fine and gives you 3 downs. Theyre not married to 1980’s schemes
  9. 34-78-83
    Excellent job fellas. Good conversation flow between you, and reasonable takes on players and the justifications for teams selecting them where they did.
  10. 34-78-83
    Na, not cost effective enough any longer to do the in-season holdout for that long.
  11. 34-78-83
    4 rounds no trades -
  12. 34-78-83
    4 rounder again
  13. 34-78-83
    you're right. It's just the 1st 4 rounds but still... we'd need to grab Asante or someone like that.
  14. 34-78-83
    4 rounds, no trades
  15. 34-78-83
    Without watching again, I recall a controversial play or ref call involving Lou Piccone in this game that could have changed the outcome. Is that accurate or am I just old?
  16. 34-78-83
    I'm interested. Long time fantasy player here (since '97) and have done many types of leagues but not yet a dynasty league, but always wanted to. Attentive player and I commish other leagues.
  17. 34-78-83
    4 rounds no trades
  18. 34-78-83
    I'm thinking much simpler here as in - the lower bowl sticks out more than the upper on the slope that they are built along, so of course the lower bowl is not covered while the upper is. Maybe I wasn't reading the post I was responding to properly idk.
  19. 34-78-83
    is it weird or just physics regarding the lower bowl coverage? I am nervously awaiting my call (currently in section 335 row 20). Hoping for under 2k per PSL but we shall see!
  20. 34-78-83
    Maybe a JAG. Not a slot.
  21. 34-78-83
    Bias or no bias, Erik and Anthony "Ant" from Cover1 for sure know more tape e v a l than 99% of TBD. Its a matter of sorting through that bias and listening to their actual film based knowledge they provide, which is quite good, and keeping the rest in perspective. Pretty useful stuff when you view it in that light.
  22. 34-78-83
    Did a 4 rounder with no trades -
  23. 34-78-83
    Traded around a bit but still 8 picks
  24. 34-78-83
    Lots of trading around (we aren't using 10 picks) -
  25. 34-78-83
    Yes 100% . That was in my post. So him they knew about and felt it was still worth signing him likely due to it being a multi year contract at that price
×
×
  • Create New...