NoSaint

looks like he actually cleared it and wants to continuing playing based on all the articles that pop up today

I mean... I think that qualifies as wheels coming off as I believe only the cardinals are on 2 years of 5 or fewer wins at the moment and no team has 3 straight currently. if Gruden is 4 out of 5 years I would guess it does the trick.

Coaches contracts are guaranteed. He’ll be there 7-8 years unless the wheels totally fall off

I will just keep saying - give your 6th lineman developmental snaps instead of lee smith

I’d imagine, best ways to move in the pocket as well as outside and then resetting would qualify

adjusted for today’s drafting style he might slide a bit in 2020s class but not wildly.

anyone watching saw he wasn’t the star he once was and already knows they don’t get along. I doubt it hurt his value in any noteworthy way

I’ve got a dude at a gas station that does phone screens for like $30. I’d imagine iPads more expensive but not $200. Find someone hustling a side gig that might void the warranty but gets it fixed. Craigslist or the like might work.

except for himself.

I never really got people freaking out over it. Not my favorite when people recline but I’m y’all too and never really effected me much. Feels like people are just angry to begin with and use this as a spot to vent

after your super bowl party thread we are all shocked by your rule...

to be fair I wasn’t advocating trubisky or tua with that. Just pointing out that if you see your guy, you get your guy. The only reason it sets you back years is you don’t have a good qb if he flops, as the draft capital is generally replaceable

because if you need a qb and think you see your guy it’s much better to definitely get him than to very likely get him

I feel like we have been talking about Cameron brate for 3 years now

I assumed that poster meant more nfl films mic than play calling discussion

I haven’t watched much - is part of it just that you care less?

it’s actually at the local high school in week 3 to reduce costs

I think language on the field would largely be a defined penalty in the CBA. Surely plenty of insults are hurled any given Sunday which I imagine would cut the league at the knees if they try to impose an indefinite suspension. Then go wouldn’t have unlimited leeway to do what they choose with Rudolph if he said it, to my understanding.

I feel like you just agreed with me but in what seems like a confrontational way.

Rudolph would still be protected by the CBA - so his banishment would be more kaepernick than league sanctioned

I suspect he will spend more than many think but less than he could. And he could spend it all without cap hell.

I hope I’m clear in wanting to spend every penny and then a few on top. Just think we could terribly overspend on a comparable DT and still come out cheaper and able to add more elsewhere. Tagging Phillips wouldn’t terribly upset me but I think we could do better

I mean, I think he’s just saying get a $5m guy and a $10m pass catcher or even a $5m guy, a $5m back, and a $5m upgrade elsewhere

I have wondered the same a bit Best I have come up with is that no matter what this is going to be a media issue at some point and if he does a formal interview and completes it in February it’s less distracting than questions throughout camp/season and allows him the “I already addressed this” for later.

more likely than not (standard for civil cases) that Garrett intentionally made it up out of thin air... which means a simple explanation of “rewatch the tape. I sacked him and basically ended the game but acted like a crazed idiot because I heard him say it” could be enough even if it’s 100% verifiable that Rudolph did not say it. simple misunderstanding or confusion can be a 100% acceptable defense to this lawsuit as malicious intent is key to the allegation that garret is making it up. Rudolph’s team doesn’t have to prove whether or not he said it, though that helps if he didn’t say it.