NoSaint

they already postponed for less than that though is my point. If this was across the line I’m curious where the line was but maybe there’s extenuating circumstances like ignoring protocol making them particularly high risk

still, this isn’t a ton of players. I would be curious when designing the enhanced practice squad how many positives the league would have allowed a game to continue with.

without knowing the cause there’s no saying it’s a responsibility issue.

His play has jumped substantially. its rare to see jumps like this. their takes last year weren’t crazy, and they are quickly giving credit now that it’s changed. such is life.

exposure without positives? Maybe?

20M isn’t even a thing. 30m would be heads exploding type of discount if he finishes the year in good shape.

Just like all the others, he was a long shot but not impossible. we are trending towards him beating the odds, which is great.

rubes, my man, You could put any game you want that day was my point. There was discussion of rearranging what weeks teams would be playing and having byes. flip flopping what day people play in a weekend would be much smaller impact if they wanted to slide things that way

id assume they’d want to prove the concept and try to ramp. If this is the most possible I’d agree.

to be fair, being #1 on an undefeated team that just gave you some extra cash comes with some honeymoon period i wont be shocked if at some point he gets annoyed by something and posts a cryptic tweet possible knocking buffalo or deletes pictures in his bills gear and becomes an instant villain that I end up defending as not that bad. he’s a very good player that can cause some drama. He’s a wide receiver after all.

I don’t think many (any?) hated diggs. i think it’s fair to debate which trade was better value.

well shoot- their long snapper is out? Pack it up. Whole position group is toast now.

Unless bills chiefs goes back to Sunday. slide 3 games by a couple days to get semi normal weeks isn’t tooooo crazy without many fans in play. probably won’t happen though.

meh. If you’ve been here 25 years and know half the regulars in person I don’t mind getting a little more leeway on joking around than a newbie Don’t think they should get away with being blatantly derogatory or anything but I get some earned reputation (good and bad) effecting moderation of someone yup - not every post will be seen or reported. If you messed up, take the medicine and move on.

if it’s Tuesday I’d venture a guess we would end up Monday against them

I don’t know that Roman is a head coach. There have been comments he’s more of a coordinator.

it’s a team honor. It’s all opinion. It’s not like they’d be violating his rights by not following some law that needed to be proven.

Yea but he would be pretty early in the process

oh I get it- I just think you are fine with a second set of mod eyes or just SDS. I wouldn’t be upset if it went your way, just felt like more than needed since it’s a pretty low key spot that does generally run so smoothly.

I would guess they feel solid enough to take a few risks on final pieces. that said, not sure he’s a guy they would want to deal with again. Both culture and cash weighed in the decision but how bad his culture issues in the building would matter a lot. A bit lazy you can work with. Open defiance, not so much.

generally agree On the first 4. politics are in everything. Hard to pretend it’s not. I’d rather focus on tone than content there, right? I think society as a whole would be better if civil discourse was encourage instead of accepting politics as a topic too far to address The exact value and how quickly they age out and what threshold you get bumped out at I don’t feel like hyper analyzing but something like you laid out seems roughly good. having a review board seems like overkill. Sometimes we may be too serious and overengineer a message board. If a poster feels targeted or misunderstood it seems easy enough to shoot the mod that hit you a note, or another mod a quick ask for help. Won’t be perfect but no answer will be.... so may as well keep it super simple.

I’d put abusive behavior, slurs and such pretty high On the penalty spectrum and off topic relatively low as conversations can meander easily without harm. Rarely do interesting conversations stay strictly on topic. as long as respectful I see zero harm with politics/Covid/whatever, especially on off the wall and have been disappointed by that recently getting shut down. Politics is too wide a topic to just tuck in the corner and pretend doesn’t exist- just be kind and adult about it. Just my two cents if opening the door to a discussion on moderation and penalties. id say let points expire pretty fast if establishing thresholds for penalty

Why would you wish that on josh

I think you are mistaking weather for the fact that bad teams often suck even more by the end of the season

very few in that number and a lot of them played with McD before. i get it, there’s some impact but less substantial then I believe most think