All Activity

So sick of seeing this argument. In previous playoff exits has the offense been "good enough" to win, if the defense matched its production? Absolutely. However, IT DOES NOT MATTER AT ALL "WHOS TO BLAME". I LITERALLY DONT CARE. WE SHOULDNT EITHER.

oh we're going to paste these guys. Everything is falling into place this year. Everything. Playoffs are like mid-September/October inter-divisional games. Likely no Mahomes and no Burrow. Maybe Jackson, but it looks doubtful. Cakewalk. Imagine saying the road is: Pittsburgh (LOL), Houston (cute story, but who takes them seriously as a SB contender?), Broncos (another cute story) Even toss in New England, who already won their Super Bowl several weeks ago here and would be trying to be the first team to win 2 rings in one season. I didn't mention Jacksonville Barbie and their dozens of rabid fans. Basically our road to the Super Bowl is beating the AFC South teams and maybe Denver. I mean LET'S GO! Now Burrow is seemingly pushing to get Zach Taylor finally fired (good luck) or get himself out of there and likely to an NFC team (few AFC landing spots for QB) taking one top QB out of the AFC mix if that happens. New stadium. Hallmark movie. Allen being an all time great. The chance for guys from past teams like Tre White, Poyer, Jordan Phillips, Gabe Davis and others I probably forgot to get a ring as part of this reunion tour. It simply cannot not happen this year.

sadly, OI'm waiting for polio to rear it's ugly head. At one recent point there were only a few cases worldwide.

Then almost did it again in 2021, except that time Jimmy didn't even have a fully functioning throwing arm. Then almost did it with the last pick of the draft in his rookie year as his QB. I would trade for Shannahan and give up two first rounders for it

That was because they didn't like his judicial views on various issues and/or may have suspected (correctly, it turns out) that he wasn't being truthful in his responses at the hearings. I've never seen anyone attack his actual qualifications, including education and work experience, as is done repeatedly with KBJ.

Ketanji Brown Jackson Makes Up Her Own Doctrine About 'Experts' in Bizarre Tangent During Supreme Court Oral Arguments By Michael Schwarz Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has a college sophomore’s understanding of the Constitution. That is no exaggeration. In fact, it might understate the case. I have taught college sophomores whose knowledge of the Constitution’s basic principles far exceeds that of Jackson. During oral arguments Monday in a case involving fired Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, Jackson peddled two grotesque lies, one of which showcased her own unconstitutional doctrine regarding so-called “experts” in the federal bureaucracy. President Donald Trump fired Slaughter in March. Slaughter responded by suing the president, claiming that SCOTUS’ decision in the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor case prevents the elected chief executive from firing the unelected heads of agencies without cause. On the whole, SCOTUS appeared hostile Monday to the idea that federal bureaucrats exist independent of the elected president’s will. That bodes well for Trump, the Constitution, liberty, and self-government. Jackson, of course, generally plays fast and loose with the Constitution. On occasion, in fact, she has reportedly annoyed even her fellow liberal justices, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. On Monday, Jackson made her dubious claims during a back-and-forth with Slaughter’s attorney, Amit Agarwal. Her first lie involved the place of “experts” in the constitutional order. “Presidents have accepted,” she said, sounding eager to interrupt Agarwal and make his point for him, “that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency that it is in the best interests of the American people to have certain kinds of issues handled by experts.” Imagine speaking those words at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. How might the revolutionaries present there have responded to the attempted imposition of an aristocracy of “experts”? Alas, Jackson’s second lie came moments later, when she described the federal bureaucracy as “non-partisan.” After nearly 10 years of deep-state attacks on Trump, does anyone seriously regard the federal agencies as non-partisan? https://www.westernjournal.com/ketanji-brown-jackson-makes-doctrine-experts-bizarre-tangent-supreme-court-oral-arguments/

Your response makes no sense.

Or 1 first for Addison

There just too many to choose from!! 🤣

I’m surprised the Bengals-Dolphins game is so low on the list. I’m thinking it will be a fun game to watch. I’m taking the over.

this is the ***** that drives me nuts.

how many died this year from covid? what was most responsible for the decrease? rubes doing their own research or highly educated scientist developing, testing and observing a vaccine? if we had partitioned the country based on vax attitudes early on, there'd be a lot fewer anti vaxxers.

he’s 11m on or off the roster - may as well have him on the roster and cut after year 2

Its close, but I think I like theirs better... negligible though. The biggest difference to me is coordinating of the passing game Reid + Nagy >>> McD + Brady It is mind boggling how non-existent our production from WR's has been. We're rolling on 2 games without being able to move the ball through WR's. Theres player personnel problems there too, 1,000%, Ive been so vocal about it for 3+ years. With that said, I can respect that we've been improvising and running pass game through RB's + TE's. Im bigly worried that unexpected TE production (Knox) is not repeatable. Kincaid cant be the only *receiving* option helping us move the chains, not sustainable at all IMO. If they can get Knox involved enough, and keep getting production out of Cook, Ty J, and healthy Kincaid, then we could have a chance. Cinci has been awful vs TE's, so def concerned that was going to a be a one-off event. Or at least, not repeatable 4xs in a row in playoffs. Infuriating that we didnt address this in off season. Nor at the trade deadline. Then bickered our way out of Waddle, who absolutely brings enough juice to this team to put us over the top IMO.

If I can draft a Roquan Smith with my 1st round pick, I'll keep it.

That’s to our favor. Dude will dig his permanent grave here soon enough

He advocated for Trey Hendrickson too and the team didn't really budge. Well, that narrows it down a bit.

You're posting non stop in the middle of the night on a Buffalo Bills message board as a Patriots fan being a 39 year old man. Your life story is evident. No one remotely successful in life has the time, energy, immaturity, or care to do what you're doing.

I know I observed a blatant false start on the Bengals left tackle on their last touchdown throw and I didn't need binoculars.

he took Jimmy Garoppolo to a Super Bowl in 2019 lol

why back up the truck now for Kincaid? was Knox's contract a great decision at the time? in retrospect? it was a simple question--in fact the topic of the thread. I understand your strengths lie in ad hominem attacks and not in debate, but give it a try!

I believe that throw to Cook right at the half time against Miami last year was insane too....

You mention in another post that Maye is better at EPA are you sure about that, Those where your words, and I responded in response to that So what am I picking and chosing, and yes Maye is slightly higher overall , with almost all coming from passing

I think it is pretty safe to say we know one thing about your career field. You definitely aren't an English teacher. Your grammar is somehow even worse than the average loudmouth masshole. *I am assuming you meant to say "entail" there.

anarchist comment