All Activity

Say what?

why wasn’t he charged?

I guess he can based off the change in the 2023 language. https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/maxwell-hairston-sexual-assault-lawsuit-could-eventually-result-in-league-discipline

I don’t remember exactly but what did beane say about ariza? Did he get that one right?

You are compelled by the sheer number of cases with Watson (me too)….yet still no charges. This reinforces the difficulty of bringing such such cases to charge. Despite copious similar accusations of exactly the same MO, DA never charged. So the posters who still insist that no charge means the victim is always a lying money grabber are simply nuts

1)On the plaintiff side, It is trivial to find a lawyer on a contingency basis if the defendant has deep pockets which an NFL 1st rounder would have, issue is if you want good lawyer or not. 2) Civil lawsuits can be as inexpensive as you want them to be, especially if the layer is on contingency, next to nothing

They lost their franchise QBs and didn't find another one and revealed Because the stars aligned for the Broncos defense to be an all-time elite unit. They had multiple future HoFers and a very talented group that was underperforming relatively and a coaching change was imo key to unlocking that.

Yup.

I wouldn't say that. I think both sides deserve the benefit of the doubt, and most comments are supportive of that idea. But, we've seen what happened w/ the Araiza situation, where there was a rush to judge. The fact that this story was known before the draft & that Beane seems to have done full due diligence on it & determined that Hairston has good character has a lot of weight in this discussion.

Are you doing a bit or something?

Thank you! I am a veteran and saved a bunch because of this. really appreciate you passing this on!

So, your plan is to find a coach who got fired for failing. Got it. Brady may or may not be over his skis as OC, so let’s make him the HC. You are making me feel better about my current position.

Let the process play out. It's a civil suit. For an ALLEGED event 4 years before he was in the NFL. It shouldn't be a football issue except for some trash talk banter.

https://x.com/againstgrmrs/status/1940455431589257699?t=9k6rWM63mqNGY6f-dmOnbQ&s=19 Gee, another one that can't be embedded yet it's just fine to be doing this behavior LIVE in front of CHILDREN.

Corruption. So prevalent now that hardly anyone notices. Mr. Trump is suing for $20 billion, claiming that CBS deceptively edited a 2024 campaign interview with Kamala Harris. The version that aired, his lawyers recently argued, “led to widespread confusion and mental anguish of consumers,” including Mr. Trump. CBS has released the full tape, and it shows that these claims are concocted. Yet the President has leverage over Paramount, because its merger with Skydance Media requires approval from the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC. Mr. Trump has reportedly turned down a $15 million settlement offer, and the Journal reported Wednesday that a mediator has proposed that the two sides settle the lawsuit for $20 million. The business logic for settling Mr. Trump’s grievance is easy to grasp: What’s $20 million in grease money, if it might save an $8 billion merger? Unless, that is, a big payout to the President could be viewed as a bribe. It’s obvious that Mr. Trump is relying on the threat of regulatory disapproval as leverage in the lawsuit. Does this really fit the federal bribery statute? What level of legal frivolousness is required before settling a civil suit becomes pretextual? https://www.wsj.com/opinion/paramount-donald-trump-lawsuit-cbs-fcc-first-amendment-23c10b02?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=ASWzDAgf43_7HI3WPOUFzOoFFnkHLlGoyR-Zstcmf5vLWRfstyqWTSkI7q00o4yjtD0%3D&gaa_ts=68657009&gaa_sig=PsZe2KxQMmKnhDX6V6Rljhwc-qRpfSqnP5aH2_9QHmxhkilDH8qjycxHHjA_cjxmLPEAgolLAHqWw6i73dOy3g%3D%3D

If Hairston comes down with 20+ charges of sexual assault, then I will throw stones. These situations aren't comparable.

sigh even the stodgy yet excitable Frankish has declared no harm, no foul on this one. Don’t let that stop you.

I don't know if you're aware of this or not, but the Bills have played a 1st place schedule the last 5 seasons. Division wins aren't the overall factor when it comes to division titles....it's overall wins. You keep bringing up Jones, Newton, Wilson etc.... We do face a lot of franchise QB's every season. In fact, McDermott has faced Mahomes in the regular season more than he's faced all the above QB's. Winning 5 straight division titles isn't hard. Sean Payton couldn't do it with Brees, Dungy couldn't do it with Manning, Bill Walsh didn't do it with Montana.....

Exactly. Lots of stones thrown around here at KC, CLE. But now since it's a Bills player, there's nothing to see.

If he was a punter, the local Buffalo would be calling for his head. What changed?

The “joke” is Haitians eat dogs. Lovely racist stereotype you write off as a “wisecrack” because you’re incapable of criticizing your fellow MAGAs here

From people I heard from Hairston was actually very open and front footed about it with teams pre-draft. That doesn't mean he didn't do anything wrong but I think teams felt like they did at least have his full side of the story.

We may be reading different Books. Corinthians: Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

He was on his school visit in March. I believe he was 17 and had graduated high school early. At least that is what I remember from the victims story. When she tried to bring charges against him she didn’t even know he was a football player and not even a student yet. The school squashed it and then she saw him on the football team in the fall and felt betrayed by the university.