All Activity

I'm surprised on the incorrect age assessment. It's just that at times, you present in a fashion similar to some middle aged helicopter parent reaching out to the coach because they noticed little Kayter (beloved only child of Kay and partner Peter) may have suffered over-rotation in right field in sequential innings vis a vis Karl Marx theory of baseball equity and adjudication. As to the rest...sometimes 'be careful on the rocks' really just means what it means. If you prefer I can offer "DANCE AROUND THEM BOULDERS LIKE A DRUNKEN MONKEY--SAFETY EQUIPMENT IS FOR ZIONISTS" . 🕊️

Yes. Hope they sent your punk azz to a Turkish prison!

I suppose you guys are referring to me. But, I'll just reiterate what I said earlier. He has things he does well, and I'll add that McDaniel put together an offensive scheme that plays well to his strengths-- quick release, accuracy, and timing especially. But, he also has some glaring deficiencies. If he gets flushed from the pocket, and has to scramble, he has a hard time keeping his eyes downfield. He has trouble extending a broken play. And yes, he has trouble staying on the field. These things are important. I'm not alone here. A quick search has him ranked in the bottom half of starting QBs. That's not a hot take.

Most exciting thing to happen at Metlife in 10 years.

Business is boomin!

Haven't heard of it - will give it a listen though based on your recommendation!

Twice. Once because a DirecTV guy accidentally backed into a car in LA. The 4 guys got out of the car and beat the **** guy. I called 911 and told them they have to get here, gangstas are beating up this guy and I think they could kill him. 4 bald headed, tatted up guys beating up a Korean cable guy. They didn't call him, they drove off and the cable guy got up and went into his van. LAPD never showed up. Another time because a guy was absolutely hammered drunk on the highway. He was swerving all over into multiple lanes at 75+ mph. He wasn't changing lanes, he was just drifting badly, then realized it, pulled hard to get back on track but it was multiple lanes each time. I don't know the result of that.

I think Moore is going to be a pleasant surprise.

Once the offense goes through a rough streak, hell will break loose. Hill will probably walk off the field or something.

You're welcome...

Ya I don't get it either. My only guess is a lot of people just watch him play against the Bills and he tends to struggle those games lol. Because I really don't get how you can watch a large sample size from Tua and come away thinking the guy sucks .

The definition, high inflation, low to negative growth, high unemployment is not met based on the current conditions.

So, we’ll put you down as not since high school.

When I moved into my current home, i continued to get mail from the previous owner and a few others that may have been previous owners as well. I would write "return to sender" with additional comments like "individual no longer resident." They would pick up the mail and then redeliver them a day or two later. I even put one of those new resident cards in the mailbox, but the mail continued. It was a lot. So I decided to save it all and after a few weeks, took a good sized box with all the mail to the post office. They collected it and thanked me for bringing it in. Two days later there was a post office tote with all the mail sitting in front of my door. I took the tote back which solved the current problem, but the mail continued. Now I just throw it away.

Tua is a good QB, and arguably very good based on the numbers (especially QBR, passer rating, and wins-losses). His sack percentage isn't bad either. The hatred of his game here is a bit laughable:

Beane interview this morning had a way different tenor than I was expecting based on Tom Pellissero’s reporting. Not that it was bad blood or anything, but Beane sounded like a guy unmoved off his position and put this negotiation in the timeframe of “if it doesn’t get done before the season, it doesn’t get done”…. Which I’m not sure how compatible that is with Cook’s sudden vibe shift.

Fine have fun in Miami.

Very inspirational... At least he isnt praising the 9/11 hijackers I guess?...

Stagflation

Fair-For the record I am not trying to argue that Tua is a great QB. My overall argument is Miami isn't as much as a joke as a lot of us think. Because if their starting QB is healthy , they easily have 10 wins last year IMO and make the playoffs

Playing with kid Gloves made Brady’s job immeasurably easier

Exactly. Does Cook really care which billionaire is cutting him a check? I sure wouldn't...

Montana also played in a much harder era of football where the rules were not being rolled out yet to benefit the passing game. Defenders could be a lot more physical not just with the QB's but with the WR's too. And BB was a defensive genius, that also allowed him to understand the opponents defense's better than anyone as well and that impacted a LOT what they did on offense. So don't discount BB's offensive impact either. Brady also had arguably the greatest TE of all time on his team too. This has no relevancy to who was better - it just shows who had the better or worse QB replace them. Brady should be acknowledged as the GOAT - Longevity and top level success in his 40's put Tom in the drivers seat for the GOAT title. But at the time Joe retired, he had as many SB wins (and no losses) as Tom did except Tom had multiple SB losses as well. There is a difference in being the GOAT (which is a career resume title) and being the "best" QB to ever play (which is a talent/ability title). Joe had his body break down and betray him preventing him from the same longevity as Tom, so he cant compete on the career long resume aspect of the GOAT conversation, which is where Tom clearly pulls away in the convo. But who was really the best QB in their prime on the field? That is a legit question and debate. Retirement age - Who is the GOAT if Brady had retired the same age as Joe? I would say Joe is probably the more popular pick as he had just as many SB rings and was undefeated in the SB with Brady having 2 losses. And at that time, Joe was still the more widely considered GOAT. Brady pulled away with all the incredible success he continued to have past that age and into his 40's. What would happen if Tom and Joe swapped places? Does Tom's resume get better or worse? I would say most likely worse both in longevity (due to the physicality) and production (due to the tougher rules). Does Joe's resume get better or worse playing in the modern era with rules to protect QB's and open up the passing game? I would say most likely better both in longevity (his body likely lasts longer than his did) and production (due to softer and easier passing rules So - no disagreement that Brady has earned GOAT recognition and title because of his high level play for as long as he was able to do it - but that doesn't necessarily mean he was still the "best" QB of the two in their respective primes on a football field on any given Sunday. That I think is very much a legitimate debate between the two.