All Activity

What's wrong? I thought Tim Walz was the pinnacle of masculinity?

The point is the crime rate of illegals should be zero. Not sure what you're trying to argue. Do u have the same compassion for people who get dwis and shop lifters? No.

Apparantly Gunther Eagleman looks like mirror universe Tim Walz

that's about as clear as a foggy day in the Appalachian Mountains in the morning.

At first I thought this was about Adrian Peterson. I was like cot dang this guy is having a rough post retirement life.

If you think that's challenging, the Oklahoma City Thunder (roster of 15) have Jalen Williams and Jaylin Williams.

There is a very meaningful distinction (economically and possibly morally) between shoplifting and watching streamed stuff without paying the going rate. Goods at Walmart (or anywhere) are economically scarce -- for you to have them someone else must in principle not have them. Information is not economically scarce, if I know (or watch something) no one else will lose that knowledge because of my streaming (or playing a song, reading a pay wall article, etc). Now, of your morality is strictly inline with the legal code, then it's definitely illegal, so by that code it's wrong. Things like my TV and even Napster when it first came out are much more gray. There were cases and arguments and so on where sharing on Napster was not illegal, or at least not punishable at some point, for example. You also have a nearly perfectly segregated market -- prices in Europe or Canada are a small fraction of what they are here in America. You will see a similar thing with soccer but I'm reverse -- way cheaper here for say Italian league seasons pass vs in Italy or Europe in general. A further complicating factor is that the NFL is not a free enterprise but a regulated trust. They have a special status existing as an exception to anti trust laws, so some people feel the law should not be how it is, and the current practices in streaming and black outs (in the past at least) are not legal in a correct interpretation of the law. From a libertarian/pure free market point of view it's no clearer. Information ownership requires government intervention to enforce IP laws. If your morality is at least in part based on a libertarian view of fairness (and in fact many Americans poll strongly along these lines) then you will see these IP laws, or at least the case of the NFLs current implementation of it, as wrong. For physical goods (and some services) there is a rule that "the lowest price is the law" where it is in at least some cases illegal to charge one person more for something than you would charge another. Limited offers, sales, and so on often get around this, but it is still a thing. It's complicated, but here is a little thought experiment -- if it's wrong to watch streamed content on a bootleg stream, is it wrong to watch the same content at your friend's house? What if he's a paying official stream customer? How about using his login when he's not using it? How about watching it through the window of a bar? Would it be wrong to cover a song you heard on the radio and record it? Would it be wrong to sing a Taylor Swift song with your daughter and record it (many do this on tik tok and such)?

Last minicamp practice is today. Update from Matt Parrino on Hairston:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/06/11/magazine/pope-leo-xiv-ancestry-family-tree.html Descended from ... well, basically every type of person. Slaveholders. Black slaves. Spaniards. Bastard child of a extramarital affair. French Canadians. What it means to be American.

Great musical legacy all the way back to Woodstock. Sad about the substance abuse. Thanks for the music, Sly. RIP

I expect they will commit crimes at same rate as the national average, yet they don't, it's much lower. The article applies to illegals and it also talks about the legal foreign born citizens. As I have said, the US needs to find a path. What Biden did was wrong, but we will be deploying our military on US citizens as a result of this topic. It has become probably the number one marching order of the right. Once complete, by all means, tell me how your life will be better? The #1 agenda of a political party should offer an improvement on normal peoples everyday life shouldn't it? Is that what we are seeing?

It's called: Chicago.

So last year was the year of wrist injury. First Boas and now this...is this the year of the calf injury?

Forgot that he injured his back. Honestly, back injuries were pretty quick recoveries for me when I was his age…. Now though…. Just give me the old yeller treatment and put me out of my misery. Though to be fair, at this point of my life I have to wrap up my joints like Kareem in 88’ just to mow the lawn.

More celebration Friday, June 13 6:45 p.m. – Army Day with the Washington Nationals Nationals vs. Marlins game featuring appearances by the Army Parachute Team, Drill Team and Army Chorus. .

Trump Speaks at Fort Bragg, and the Press Loses Its Mind David Manney This is what it always comes back to with these people: Trump says something bold, the media howls “dictator,” and the rest of us are left scratching our heads, wondering how we got from a speech to a constitutional crisis. Take Fort Bragg. President Trump stood in front of American soldiers and delivered a hard-hitting, no-apologies speech. He talked about law and order. He criticized liberal-run cities. He called out the dysfunction we all see every day. But because he did it in front of our military, MSNBC melted into a puddle of Cold War-era paranoia. “Civil war,” they cried. “Militarizing politics.” You’d think he rode in on a tank. Trump didn’t threaten anyone. He didn’t give orders. What he provided was an honest assessment of the mess that Democratic leaders have created and how their failures hit hardest on working Americans and service members alike. He called out crime, border chaos, and the soft, focus-group language that passes for leadership in D.C. He reminded the troops they serve a country worth fighting for, not just one worth apologizing for. That used to be standard fare. Now it’s fascism, apparently. Funny how the goalposts move. Meanwhile, Joe Biden Defied the Court and Laughs About It Remember the student loan saga? The Supreme Court ruled against Biden’s sweeping forgiveness plan, saying it flat-out violated the law. Six justices said no. End of story. Except it wasn’t. Biden didn’t pause or pivot quietly. He took a victory lap. “The Supreme Court blocked it. But that didn’t stop me,” he said with a smile. That wasn’t a slip. That was the sales pitch. He defied a legal decision on camera and got applauded for it by the very people now clutching their pearls over Trump giving a speech. Let that sink in. {snip} So, let’s not pretend MSNBC is worried about democracy. They’re afraid their team might lose power. That’s what this is about. The Numbers Don’t Lie Let’s count it up. Trump: Tariffs and immigration enforcement, blocked by courts. Faced multiple legal losses. Never told the public, “They can’t stop me.” Biden: Student loan bailout blocked. He bragged he’d do it anyway. Title IX rule changes flagged by judges kept going. Vaccine mandates were ruled unlawful, but enforcement dragged on. Both have clashed with courts. Only one turned it into a punchline. This Isn’t About the Speech. It’s About the Setting What really set MSNBC off wasn’t what Trump said. It was where he said it. Fort Bragg. Military backdrop. Patriotic crowd. That’s what made their alarms start blaring. Because when Trump speaks in that kind of setting, he connects. He reminds people, especially those in uniform, that someone still notices them. Still sees their sacrifice. Still believes in the country they serve. And that terrifies the ruling class. They want the military to serve as a neutral backdrop for a photo opportunity. Not a crowd that cheers when a president points out the rot at the top. The Left Doesn’t Want Unity. They Want Submission Biden can bend the Constitution like taffy and get praised for “trying.” Trump talks tough and gets accused of marching us toward martial law. This is narrative warfare. Always has been. They’re not scared of Trump using troops. They’re afraid of troops agreeing with him. They don’t fear tanks. They fear applause. And so they write these tortured screeds about how “democracy is in danger” when what’s actually in danger is their grip on the narrative. MORE at the link: https://pjmedia.com/david-manney/2025/06/11/trump-speaks-at-fort-bragg-and-the-press-loses-its-mind-n4940703

since this pivoted to Shakir; i am not sure Shakir could handle being a 100+ reception guy. i think he has 3 maybe 4 more years at this level as a maximum. the less we feed him the ball the better he will be and we can only do that by giving other targets to Josh

I know you don't call them what they are because you've swallowed your masters' narrative whole. I describe them using words that describe their presence here accurately. They broke the law entering the country, and they are thus here illegally. Now if we're talking actual immigrants, or those who entered this country according to the law, then I fully support those people being here. For me and most of the country the number of acceptable crimes committed by illegal aliens in the USA is zero. Since you want to make ridiculous comparisons to known risks people take every day that have nothing to do with THE LAW I'll ask you this: What's the number of acceptable murders, rapes, robberies etc. committed by illegal aliens in the USA for you? Or does it only matter when it hits close to home? Since this paper is about crime among immigrants I'm only left to assume that they are talking about the legal kind. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if lawful immigrants, who have been vetted and have gone through the legal immigration process, commit less crime. Now do illegal rate among the unvetted who entered the country by the millions over the last four years.

Brady did a pretty solid job pressuring the boundary with Cook and Johnson, particularly against Detroit. That’s too much scheme and effort to be perpetually sustained though. Hopefully that Palmer, Coleman and Moore can make enough boundary plays early in the year to create space inside.

Yeah, that’s right, its stupid, 🤣

In fact I was just yesterday in the bushes over Lahaina Town. Good time.

It's right there in the injury report. He injured his back against the Rams in December. Missed two games, played the week after, limited snaps week 18 when we were resting folks. I dunno about you, but when I've injured my back, 4 weeks out is when it starts to improve from screaming at me constantly no matter what I do, to allowing me to sit politely in certain positions and stand politely, and only screaming at me when I go from one to the other. By 6 weeks out I can walk OK if I'm smooth and careful and the screaming my back does has improved to a sharp yelp or 3. Football players are a different breed, but I don't think you need a magnifying glass to connect the dots there.

How are people gonna jump to unconfirmed conclusions when you go and present facts and context, what a killjoy…, 🤣

So has the Thigh Doctor weighed in yet and put this speculation to bed?