Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

We've got a QB with WR's that can't open.

 

Rashid Shaheed is a WR who can get open, but a QB that can't hit him.

 

 

I tried to watch some of that game yesterday, team was atrocious turnover factory.  Shaheed gave up an INT that felt more like a fumble in the way it happened. Olave may have fumbled too (???), dont quote me.  It was 4 TO's in a half, felt like the whole team had one .  It was a flurry of TO's so I zoned out.  Unsure if thats uncommon for Shaheed.  Im still on board, maybe someone knowqs better than me

Posted
36 minutes ago, Bangarang said:

i honestly don't even think a burner at WR would move the needle much for this offense. Brady can't even get Curtis Samuel involved. He may not be an elite WR but he at least has a record of being a solid player. I don't think pushing the ball down field is something Brady wants to do unless we absolutely have to. 

Crediting any blame to Brady for Samuel is bonkers.  At least Percy Harvin consistently had the same issue. Samuel is f**** hurt with a different issue every week. Its crazy. I'll say it, hes soft as baby s***

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, BillsShredder83 said:

I tried to watch some of that game yesterday, team was atrocious turnover factory.  Shaheed gave up an INT that felt more like a fumble in the way it happened. Olave may have fumbled too (???), dont quote me.  It was 4 TO's in a half, felt like the whole team had one .  It was a flurry of TO's so I zoned out.  Unsure if thats uncommon for Shaheed.  Im still on board, maybe someone knowqs better than me


Shaheed and Rattler had the only fumbles from what I saw. After checking the box score, yes. It was just the 2. 
 

That team reminds me of Houston in some ways. Not as great a defense but solid nonetheless. 3 turnovers, one returned for 6 and the Bucs were only up 7-3 @ the half. 
 

Offense needs to figure it out in the QB department and get them a new RT. Center is an issue but that McCoy guy returns from injury.  They have plenty pieces to be successful, hence why I think they’ll be reluctant to trade Olave. Shaheed is probably the guy they move. Wild be if I was running the GM role. 

Posted
45 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

 

if we can't do any better, I'd take him for a 3rd maybe they have a DT or S to help us too?

Yeah, I'm definitely in the "just do SOMETHING" camp at WR at the moment. I really don't care about the cost. Just somebody or a couple some bodies that can create separation. Doesn't even have to be a big name...raid practice squads, look at the FA market, overpay for somebody. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, BillsShredder83 said:

I tried to watch some of that game yesterday, team was atrocious turnover factory.  Shaheed gave up an INT that felt more like a fumble in the way it happened. Olave may have fumbled too (???), dont quote me.  It was 4 TO's in a half, felt like the whole team had one .  It was a flurry of TO's so I zoned out.  Unsure if thats uncommon for Shaheed.  Im still on board, maybe someone knowqs better than me

Shaheed has had 215 touches in his career (receptions, rushes, kick returns) and has had 4 fumbles. Seems normal, more or less. Maybe slightly on the high end in terms of percentage, but it's in the range of normal. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...