Búfalo Blanco Posted August 27 Posted August 27 Been rooting for this dude for 2 years now... Amazing and well deserved. 2 1 Quote
quincy Posted September 2 Posted September 2 I loved seeing a number 80 playing for the Buffalo Bills on offense but alas not by Shavers this year. Not seen this posted elsewhere. Still eager to see what he can do when given the opportunity. Bills' promising WR Tyrell Shavers changes jersey number to match two recent Buffalo stars Bills Rising WR Will Have a New Look For Week 1 Quote
MJS Posted September 2 Posted September 2 23 minutes ago, quincy said: I loved seeing a number 80 playing for the Buffalo Bills on offense but alas not by Shavers this year. Not seen this posted elsewhere. Still eager to see what he can do when given the opportunity. Bills' promising WR Tyrell Shavers changes jersey number to match two recent Buffalo stars Bills Rising WR Will Have a New Look For Week 1 Darn. He looked so good in 80. 1 1 Quote
BlueRed Posted September 2 Posted September 2 48 minutes ago, quincy said: I loved seeing a number 80 playing for the Buffalo Bills on offense but alas not by Shavers this year. Not seen this posted elsewhere. Still eager to see what he can do when given the opportunity. Bills' promising WR Tyrell Shavers changes jersey number to match two recent Buffalo stars Bills Rising WR Will Have a New Look For Week 1 Thanks for the warning - It always takes me a few games to get used to players that switch up their numbers. Hopefully he plays just as well in number 14! Quote
Captain_Quint Posted September 2 Posted September 2 1 hour ago, BlueRed said: Thanks for the warning - It always takes me a few games to get used to players that switch up their numbers. Hopefully he plays just as well in number 14! In the preseason, I was shocked at the backslide that was happening to Terrell Bernard. Out of position, couldn't tackle, playing with the 3rd string, etc. Then I realized that #43 is now rookie Dorian Strong. 3 Quote
Búfalo Blanco Posted yesterday at 09:43 PM Posted yesterday at 09:43 PM Keep this dude on the field, Brady.. He’s working out just fine. 4 1 Quote
Steptide Posted yesterday at 09:44 PM Posted yesterday at 09:44 PM Really hoping they make shavers a bigger part of the offense. He's a big target and obviously can make plays, as we all saw today. Keep throwing it to him 1 1 Quote
Buffalo716 Posted yesterday at 09:45 PM Posted yesterday at 09:45 PM He was a guy with a lot of potential that needed time to grow Time most teams don't have to put into a undrafted fa.. but he's been a core special teamer which has given him time on the roster He was recruited by Alabama.. he has some receiving talent even though he doesn't have the repetition... he at least has great effort which is something that you cannot coach 1 1 Quote
Behindenemylines Posted yesterday at 10:16 PM Posted yesterday at 10:16 PM But did he buy a winter coat at Macy’s? 3 Quote
rusty shackleford Posted yesterday at 10:46 PM Posted yesterday at 10:46 PM Davis and Shavers are the exact type of receivers you want rounding out your WR room at #4 and #5 after your star #1, dependable #2, and a solid shifty slot. Our problem is we’re missing the 1 and 2. 2 2 1 Quote
Turbo44 Posted yesterday at 11:22 PM Posted yesterday at 11:22 PM Sometimes unheralded recievers come out of nowhere and become stars. Shavers has a chance and maybe this game is the coming out party for him. he had very little production in college BUT he’s huge (6’4”), runs a 4.4 and is a very good blocker. Isn’t this everything we are looking for in a wr? He plays a lot of plays too td catch wasn’t an easy catch and I noticed he was open for a wide open td on that first down pass to Knox where he was tackled. I think he also had a key block on tai’s td 1 Quote
Buffalo716 Posted yesterday at 11:23 PM Posted yesterday at 11:23 PM (edited) 37 minutes ago, rusty shackleford said: Davis and Shavers are the exact type of receivers you want rounding out your WR room at #4 and #5 after your star #1, dependable #2, and a solid shifty slot. Our problem is we’re missing the 1 and 2. Dude if you have a great number one dependable two and three option you definitely don't have a 350 million quarterback or a good offensive line The Bengles have all the weapons but Joe burrow can't survive that's why you need to hit in the draft Those three guys would command a good chunk of salary cap Edited yesterday at 11:24 PM by Buffalo716 Quote
Turbo44 Posted yesterday at 11:25 PM Posted yesterday at 11:25 PM (edited) 41 minutes ago, rusty shackleford said: Davis and Shavers are the exact type of receivers you want rounding out your WR room at #4 and #5 after your star #1, dependable #2, and a solid shifty slot. Our problem is we’re missing the 1 and 2. Yeah waddle would have been a really nice #1 , under control for next year too. But instead of trading say #31 for a proven #1 (or at least a top tier #2) Beane refuses to trade it. So he can draft another Elam/coleman a$$hat 4 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said: Dude if you have a great number one dependable two and three option you definitely don't have a 350 million quarterback or a good offensive line The Bengles have all the weapons but Joe burrow can't survive that's why you need to hit in the draft Those three guys would command a good chunk of salary cap Nope - this absolutely was possible #1 waddle #2 shakir #3 palmer #4 davis #5 shavers mix in a top 10 TE (when healthy) and a top 5 RB and this is a great offense Edited yesterday at 11:28 PM by Turbo44 Quote
Buffalo716 Posted yesterday at 11:29 PM Posted yesterday at 11:29 PM 3 minutes ago, Turbo44 said: Yeah waddle would have been a really nice #1 , under control for next year too. But instead of trading say #31 for a proven #1 (or at least a top tier #2) Beane refuses to trade it. So he can draft another Elam/coleman a$$hat Nope - this absolutely was possible #1 waddle #2 shakir #3 palmer #4 davis #5 shavers mix in a top 10 TE (when healthy) and a top 5 RB and this is a great offense Yeah but it takes two to tango and the dolphins aren't trading us waddle to their 60-year rival 1 Quote
Saint Doug Posted yesterday at 11:30 PM Posted yesterday at 11:30 PM 3 minutes ago, Turbo44 said: Yeah waddle would have been a really nice #1 , under control for next year too. But instead of trading say #31 for a proven #1 (or at least a top tier #2) Beane refuses to trade it. So he can draft another Elam/coleman a$$hat Nope - this absolutely was possible #1 waddle #2 shakir #3 palmer #4 davis #5 shavers mix in a top 10 TE (when healthy) and a top 5 RB and this is a great offense Wait, how do we know Beane was unwilling to send Miami a 1st for Waddle? I thought they had offered the best package and Miami didn’t want to help Buffalo out. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.