GoBills808 Posted August 18 Posted August 18 2 hours ago, julian said: Ok I'll spell it out then We are pretty much guaranteed a division title and a home first round matchup against a low seed. Our Super Bowl path is and has been fairly straightforward and our off-season moves can be thusly informed The Bengals' path is more complex. To earn a division title for them means battling one top tier AFC contender all season in a difficult division. Falling short of that, a wildcard puts them on the road vs another top AFC team, then at least one more en route to the AFCCG. They need to construct their team for multiple paths and assemble personnel to accommodate Is that clear enough or should I write it in crayon for you 1 Quote
H2o Posted August 18 Posted August 18 (edited) I'd be in on Hendrickson if we could get him. Can you imagine THAT defensive line? Groot, Bosa, Hendrickson, Oliver, Sanders, Jones, and Walker. We'd have 60 sacks. Edited August 18 by H2o Quote
Brand J Posted August 18 Posted August 18 4 minutes ago, H2o said: I'd be in on Hendrickson is we could get him. Can you imagine THAT defensive line? Groot, Bosa, Hendrickson, Oliver, Sanders, Jones, and Walker. We'd have 60 sacks. No with our secondary. 1 1 2 1 Quote
zow2 Posted August 18 Posted August 18 (edited) I’d rather have a ball hawking hard hitting Safety, but i’d start making calls about Hendrickson or Micah Parsons. I’m worried about the defense here but it’s probably more from PTSD Edited August 18 by zow2 1 Quote
julian Posted August 18 Posted August 18 1 hour ago, GoBills808 said: Ok I'll spell it out then We are pretty much guaranteed a division title and a home first round matchup against a low seed. Our Super Bowl path is and has been fairly straightforward and our off-season moves can be thusly informed The Bengals' path is more complex. To earn a division title for them means battling one top tier AFC contender all season in a difficult division. Falling short of that, a wildcard puts them on the road vs another top AFC team, then at least one more en route to the AFCCG. They need to construct their team for multiple paths and assemble personnel to accommodate Is that clear enough or should I write it in crayon for you The fact you take issue with me calling the Bengals a garbage organization is kinda bizarre, this isn’t some crazy take lol. Mike Brown is a bottom 3 owner, this is well documented lol. I don’t care that they have a tough division, so what ? You have a top 4 QB and you struggle to make the playoffs. Maybe stop treating your players like it’s 1975 and change the culture. You obviously have some affinity for the Bengals, that’s fine… we just disagree. 2 Quote
GoBills808 Posted August 18 Posted August 18 3 minutes ago, julian said: The fact you take issue with me calling the Bengals a garbage organization is kinda bizarre, this isn’t some crazy take lol. Mike Brown is a bottom 3 owner, this is well documented lol. I don’t care that they have a tough division, so what ? You have a top 4 QB and you struggle to make the playoffs. Maybe stop treating your players like it’s 1975 and change the culture. You obviously have some affinity for the Bengals, that’s fine… we just disagree. Again- you jumped into a conversation w your own tangent. I wasn't talking about how the Bengals treat their players and I don't care. I can't stand the Bengals ffs Quote
julian Posted August 18 Posted August 18 8 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: Again- you jumped into a conversation w your own tangent. I wasn't talking about how the Bengals treat their players and I don't care. I can't stand the Bengals ffs I didn’t jump into any conversation lol, I never quoted you or any poster, I made a statement and another poster and I had a simple back and forth and it was you who jumped into our conversation lol. I had to go back and double check because you’ve now said it twice about jumping into your conversation or any conversation lol. Sunday night bender maybe lol, anyway it’s not that serious dude let’s part ways here lol. Quote
GoBills808 Posted August 18 Posted August 18 Just now, julian said: I didn’t jump into any conversation lol, I never quoted you or any poster, I made a statement and another poster and I had a simple back and forth and it was you who jumped into our conversation lol. I had to go back and double check because you’ve now said it twice about jumping into your conversation or any conversation lol. Sunday night bender maybe lol, anyway it’s not that serious dude let’s part ways here lol. It definitely was your conversation 😂😂 I just went back and read it too And I'm not even drinking Quote
Thrivefourfive Posted August 18 Posted August 18 7 minutes ago, julian said: I didn’t jump into any conversation lol, I never quoted you or any poster, I made a statement and another poster and I had a simple back and forth and it was you who jumped into our conversation lol. I had to go back and double check because you’ve now said it twice about jumping into your conversation or any conversation lol. Sunday night bender maybe lol, anyway it’s not that serious dude let’s part ways here lol. I respect you for indenting 1 Quote
julian Posted August 18 Posted August 18 7 minutes ago, Thrivefourfive said: I respect you for indenting Thank you, it’s a dying art 14 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: It definitely was your conversation 😂😂 I just went back and read it too And I'm not even drinking Finally lol. good night good sir. 1 Quote
BullBuchanan Posted August 18 Posted August 18 12 hours ago, dave mcbride said: The Bills have no cap space - the very least in the league. Why do people still think this matters in 2025? We could make the cap space to sign anyone we wanted, if we wanted. 2 Quote
dave mcbride Posted August 18 Posted August 18 6 hours ago, BullBuchanan said: Why do people still think this matters in 2025? We could make the cap space to sign anyone we wanted, if we wanted. This is simply not true. He wants a LOT of money. Rather than saying the cap doesn’t matter, show me a path to getting there, bearing in mind the restructures they’ve already done to get under the cap. Quote
JP51 Posted August 18 Posted August 18 after last night I am like do whatever you need to get him... lol before I was like no way... too much money, too many assets... but jeez... we need to do something... FTLOG lol Quote
RFL Posted August 18 Posted August 18 If traded he goes to NFC….there is NO way they trade to an AFC contender 1 Quote
SoTier Posted August 18 Posted August 18 10 hours ago, GoBills808 said: Ok I'll spell it out then We are pretty much guaranteed a division title and a home first round matchup against a low seed. Our Super Bowl path is and has been fairly straightforward and our off-season moves can be thusly informed The Bengals' path is more complex. To earn a division title for them means battling one top tier AFC contender all season in a difficult division. Falling short of that, a wildcard puts them on the road vs another top AFC team, then at least one more en route to the AFCCG. They need to construct their team for multiple paths and assemble personnel to accommodate Is that clear enough or should I write it in crayon for you The Bengals don't have to win their division to make the playoffs and have a chance to win the Super Bowl. Their problem is that they can't even make the playoffs with a last place schedule, the best QB/WR combo in the NFL, and a 3-3 divisional record because their OL doesn't protect Burrow well enough, their running game is mediocre, and their defense stinks. Their "solution" is to double down on their receiving corps and kick their best defender to the curb. 1 Quote
Gregg Posted August 18 Posted August 18 https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/report-colts-among-teams-to-have-shown-interest-in-trading-for-bengals-trey-hendrickson/ar-AA1KGy8I?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=b6abc6cd6a6c4b4e82f6b33e6a7947c8&ei=15 1 1 Quote
Fleezoid Posted August 18 Posted August 18 So, apparently the Bengals will likely want an "impact" player or 2 in a trade. Well, now I know why the Bills aren't in the conversation....they have no impact player they could give up. Quote
Dick_Cheney Posted August 18 Posted August 18 8 minutes ago, Fleezoid said: So, apparently the Bengals will likely want an "impact" player or 2 in a trade. Well, now I know why the Bills aren't in the conversation....they have no impact player they could give up. We could always give them a player who would have a negative impact! 1 Quote
BullBuchanan Posted August 18 Posted August 18 5 hours ago, dave mcbride said: This is simply not true. He wants a LOT of money. Rather than saying the cap doesn’t matter, show me a path to getting there, bearing in mind the restructures they’ve already done to get under the cap. It actually IS true. The money doesn't matter. Have you seen the Eagles books? Here's an explanation: Quote
SoTier Posted August 18 Posted August 18 2 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said: It actually IS true. The money doesn't matter. Have you seen the Eagles books? Here's an explanation: The cap issue is irrelevant. I can't believe that even Mike Brown would be so stupid as to approve of a trade of Hendrickson to a top contender in the AFC. If they pull off a trade, it's likely to be to the NFC or an AFC bottom feeder. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.