Jump to content

Packers vs Eagles confirmed week 1 in Brazil.


Gregg

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TheWeatherMan said:

I think it’s perfectly natural for a fan base to be discontent on losing 1 of 7/8 home games.  Loyalty works both ways...


Now imagine the future, where you'll pay $5K and up for a seat license.. for the right to buy a ticket to a game... oops nope... we're moving the game to another country... insanity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BBFL said:

What a joke that a teams fans lose the home opener to the season. Absolute let down. 

I mean, then it's not really a "home" opener. The home opener would be the 2nd home game on their schedule. Both teams basically road teams in Brazil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they going to take up the good field and put down a crap field for the NFL players, again? Will there be any “jet lag experiments”? 

 

I don’t resent the Billionaires for their wealth, but when they compromise the game in the interest of more money, I have a problem.  

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

I mean, then it's not really a "home" opener. The home opener would be the 2nd home game on their schedule. Both teams basically road teams in Brazil.

 

But technically it’s a home game for one team, right? Like the Bills were the home team when we played in London last year in front of the fan base the NFL and the Jags had been cultivating since 2013. Home games take place in your own stadium in front of your own fans. Period. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

But technically it’s a home game for one team, right? Like the Bills were the home team when we played in London last year in front of the fan base the NFL and the Jags had been cultivating since 2013. Home games take place in your own stadium in front of your own fans. Period. 

With the 17 games schedule teams are "losing" 1 home game that already had 9, for the most part. It's really not a huge issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BuffaloBillyG said:

With the 17 games schedule teams are "losing" 1 home game that already had 9, for the most part. It's really not a huge issue. 

 

I realize it’s bigger to me than most people, but it still bothers me. A team that doesn’t play overseas does not lose that home game, and one game can decide if you make the playoffs and where you have to play. That’s why teams fight tooth and nail to get a good seed in the playoffs, HOME FIELD.

 

It is admittedly less of an issue with more games, but it is still inherently unfair IMO. Not that anyone cares. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

With the 17 games schedule teams are "losing" 1 home game that already had 9, for the most part. It's really not a huge issue. 

 

This year the NFC gets 9 home games and 8 road games. On the flip of "home" argument is the "road" team gets to play one less real road game. So, they get 9 home games with 7 road games and a neutral site game which is what this is for both teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Augie said:

Are they going to take up the good field and put down a crap field for the NFL players, again? Will there be any “jet lag experiments”? 

 

I don’t resent the Billionaires for their wealth, but when they compromise the game in the interest of more money, I have a problem.  


I believe Brazil is in the same time zone that we are so that shouldn’t be an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

With the 17 games schedule teams are "losing" 1 home game that already had 9, for the most part. It's really not a huge issue. 

 

You don't have to put losing in quotes, one team is losing a home game no matter how you spin it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BBFL said:

What a joke that a teams fans lose the home opener to the season. Absolute let down. 

No one seems to be complaining about the extra money being brought in by it - 48.8% of which goes to the players. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good luck to them.

Whatever money the NFL earns from these offshore games, the players should get half.  

It's a real speed bump to the season.  That game in London, for the Bills, nearly caused their season to cartwheel into a catastrophe.  

If the entire team had been inflicted with the flu it couldn't have caused more problems.  The recent games snowed out by blizzards have been less of an issue.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...