Mat68 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 The signing of Samuel makes the top of the draft wide open. An argument could be had that they might be better getting top interior Dlineman or top five edge at 28. The difference between the 5th and 12 wr is not that wide. Im curious how Beane plays it and what guys he values. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nosejob Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 18 minutes ago, Mat68 said: The signing of Samuel makes the top of the draft wide open. An argument could be had that they might be better getting top interior Dlineman or top five edge at 28. The difference between the 5th and 12 wr is not that wide. Im curious how Beane plays it and what guys he values. In terms of numbers, they can only dress 53 so the 1st 5 picks at least gotta hit, doubt they'll take more than 8. There's no sense of loading up on Oline(minus maybe C), TE, RB,LB etc. just to see them poached off the P.S. Start from the 7th rd. and start pushing everything up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat68 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 14 minutes ago, nosejob said: In terms of numbers, they can only dress 53 so the 1st 5 picks at least gotta hit, doubt they'll take more than 8. There's no sense of loading up on Oline(minus maybe C), TE, RB,LB etc. just to see them poached off the P.S. Start from the 7th rd. and start pushing everything up. Center/Guard is a need. Lost 2 guys that dressed. I think you can get a guy with some juice at RB that would push Johnson. Im not overly impressed with the depth anywhere. Drafting a TE or linebacker and having to cut Morris or Spector helps improve the roster. Later in the draft you go wider odds of hitting. If you need 5 guys you best use 9 -11 picks and find those 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special K Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 (edited) These may be 2 of the guys McBeane could not pass on in the first if either of them fell to 28. 28. Johnny Newton DT Illinois 60. Xavier Legette WR South Carolina or 28. Jared Verse Edge FSU 60. Xavier Legette WR S Carolina Edited March 16 by Special K 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Who Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Passed on Mitchell to take the fella I suppose McD would really want if available at #28. Still came out pretty well. BUF 28. Cooper DeJeanS Iowa 64. Xavier LegetteWR South Carolina 128. Tanor BortoliniOC Wisconsin 132. Jordan JeffersonDT LSU 134. Isaiah DavisRB South Dakota State 144. Javon BakerWR UCF 160. Keith Randolph Jr.DT Illinois 163. Jaylon CarliesS Missouri 189. Marist LiufauLB Notre Dame 200. Dylan McMahonOG NC State 204. Myles ColeEDGE Texas Tech 248. Carter BradleyQB South Alabama 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScorpionZero Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 (edited) 15 hours ago, Richard Noggin said: To be completely honest, I almost automatically skip past these front-loaded, trade-heavy lists of assets exchanged and picks. No offense to you. The format is less accessible than comparable screenshots. It's a shame because how evidently you enjoy exploring a multitude of draft possibilities, often bucking needs-based fan consensus. But then I have to ask: which effing simulator has Latu available at 28?! That's...interesting. Safety is nicely restocked here, and the EDGE pipeline is filled. Solid #2 RB added. LG now a competition between Edwards and strong prospect in McCormick. But the two biggest needs, WR and DT, according to most fans, are not prioritized. Tez Walker looked LOST at the Senior Bowl (despite his impressive traits), and Eboigbe is more of a 3-4 DE prospect than a 4-3 DT. Not a great fit. Smith could represent value, I guess, given his surprise med e v a l at the combine. Here's a similarly UNsatisfying draft haul that could be beneficial in the longer term. Most of these guys should be NFL contributors sooner rather than later. I'm guessing most posters will be mad about WR and DT. It's MDD, mock draft database. I agree the trade back hauls are ridiculous. As for picks, usually half way through drafting it just becomes tedious, sometimes I just draft highest rated player regardless of position which was the case with Eboigbe. Otherwise it's just me getting to know the players, reading write ups or watching film, I'll watch highlights but I'm generally more interested in the film against a particular team, as your able to see the player from play to play rather than when they make a play. No need to say no offense, we're just having fun with this and I Rather enjoy criticism, as it makes me a better evaluator because it checks my judgement on decisions. Edited March 16 by ScorpionZero Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBFL Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 If he goes defense, specifically edge rusher, Missouri’s Robinson would be legit. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Who Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Just now, BBFL said: If he goes defense, specifically edge rusher, Missouri’s Robinson would be legit. I certainly prefer him to Chop. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBFL Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Just now, Dr. Who said: I certainly prefer him to Chop. Was actually hoping he would be there @ 60… After his combine there’s no way that’s a possibility unless he has a pro day, bombs it and/or gets injured. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScorpionZero Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 28. Adonai MitchellWR Texas 60. Ruke OrhorhoroDT Clemson 128. MarShawn LloydRB USC 134. Javon SolomonEDGE Troy 144. Tyler DavisDT Clemson 160. Javon BakerWR UCF 163. Tykee SmithS Georgia 189. Nehemiah PritchettCB Auburn 200. Dominique HamptonS Washington 204. Dwight McGlothernCB Arkansas 248. Javontae Jean-BaptisteEDGE Notre Dame Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Who Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 1 minute ago, ScorpionZero said: 28. Adonai MitchellWR Texas 60. Ruke OrhorhoroDT Clemson 128. MarShawn LloydRB USC 134. Javon SolomonEDGE Troy 144. Tyler DavisDT Clemson 160. Javon BakerWR UCF 163. Tykee SmithS Georgia 189. Nehemiah PritchettCB Auburn 200. Dominique HamptonS Washington 204. Dwight McGlothernCB Arkansas 248. Javontae Jean-BaptisteEDGE Notre Dame I like this one pretty well, but I'm not crazy about Lloyd at 128. Orhorhoro is an interesting fella. It's a bit of a bet on a wild card, but I'm okay with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo44 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 (edited) Thomas wr 22 (Trade up) sweat DL 52 (trade up) Beaux limmer OC 123 trade up Oladapo S 169 trade up eichenburg LB 204 gabriel Murphy edge 248 Reasonable trades and 11 picks turned into 6, but there’s no way we have room in our roster for 11 picks. In this draft we get our top wr, a top dl, one of the best centers, a very good safety and a good LB. Full disclosure, I have no idea about Murphy Edited March 16 by Turbo44 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuvian Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 I see the Cards, Chargers and Bears (from 9, not 1) trading down and the Titans and Giants move up and into the QB market Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScorpionZero Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 Ok before you skip past because of trades I made these myself, not the computer generated ones. I only made realistic ones. If you don't think so, correct me. First of all I traded back because of value, without AD being there I didn't see anyone worth 28 at this point, and for the record I see AD as a WR1 in time. I went back to 33 and 65 to pick up 101 as I think late third to fifth is the meat of the draft, when 33 came Nubin was available at 41 so I played the value card and found a trade picking up 38 and 106. Value seemed right at that point and began drafting, always looking at need/BPA. Let me know. Trade Recap Buffalo Receives: 2024: Round 2, Pick 33 2024: Round 3, Pick 65 2024: Round 4, Pick 101 Carolina Receives: 2024: Round 1, Pick 28 2024: Round 2, Pick 60 Buffalo Receives: 2024: Round 2, Pick 38 2024: Round 4, Pick 106 Tennessee Receives: 2024: Round 2, Pick 33 My Selections 38 Tyler Nubin who can argue with this S | Minnesota TRADE 65 Adisa Isaac BPA/need designated pass rusher EDGE | Penn State TRADE 101 Devontez Walker deep threat/different type of receiver. WR | North Carolina TRADE 106 Cole Bishop outstanding value, pairs up nicely with Nubin. S | Utah TRADE 128 Ben Sinnott all around tight end, save cap space next season letting Knox go. Improved running game in 12/13 personnel. Also reminds me of Wychek/Clark TE | Kansas State 134 Javon Baker different type of receiver, talented had upside. WR | UCF 144 DeWayne Carter fits in rotation DL | Duke 160 Javon Solomon Small School, talented, possible steal. EDGE | Troy 163 Nehemiah Pritchett size, skill in zone defense CB | Auburn 196 Isaac Guerendo 6' 220lbs with 4.33 long speed, can't do worse. RB | Louisville 200 Dwight McGlothern another corner made for zone. CB | Arkansas 204 Hunter Nourzad well coached, G/C prospect. IOL | Penn State 248 Fabien Lovett size/experience based traits. DL | Florida State Tell me what you think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo44 Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 1 hour ago, ScorpionZero said: Ok before you skip past because of trades I made these myself, not the computer generated ones. I only made realistic ones. If you don't think so, correct me. First of all I traded back because of value, without AD being there I didn't see anyone worth 28 at this point, and for the record I see AD as a WR1 in time. I went back to 33 and 65 to pick up 101 as I think late third to fifth is the meat of the draft, when 33 came Nubin was available at 41 so I played the value card and found a trade picking up 38 and 106. Value seemed right at that point and began drafting, always looking at need/BPA. Let me know. Trade Recap Buffalo Receives: 2024: Round 2, Pick 33 2024: Round 3, Pick 65 2024: Round 4, Pick 101 Carolina Receives: 2024: Round 1, Pick 28 2024: Round 2, Pick 60 Buffalo Receives: 2024: Round 2, Pick 38 2024: Round 4, Pick 106 Tennessee Receives: 2024: Round 2, Pick 33 My Selections 38 Tyler Nubin who can argue with this S | Minnesota TRADE 65 Adisa Isaac BPA/need designated pass rusher EDGE | Penn State TRADE 101 Devontez Walker deep threat/different type of receiver. WR | North Carolina TRADE 106 Cole Bishop outstanding value, pairs up nicely with Nubin. S | Utah TRADE 128 Ben Sinnott all around tight end, save cap space next season letting Knox go. Improved running game in 12/13 personnel. Also reminds me of Wychek/Clark TE | Kansas State 134 Javon Baker different type of receiver, talented had upside. WR | UCF 144 DeWayne Carter fits in rotation DL | Duke 160 Javon Solomon Small School, talented, possible steal. EDGE | Troy 163 Nehemiah Pritchett size, skill in zone defense CB | Auburn 196 Isaac Guerendo 6' 220lbs with 4.33 long speed, can't do worse. RB | Louisville 200 Dwight McGlothern another corner made for zone. CB | Arkansas 204 Hunter Nourzad well coached, G/C prospect. IOL | Penn State 248 Fabien Lovett size/experience based traits. DL | Florida State Tell me what you think. I think all the trades looks reasonable but I don’t like the strategy. Buffalo needs quality not quantity, so I see them trading up at least once, maybe twice in rd’s 1-4 and end up drafting 7-8 players. No need to use 11 of picks cuz only roster space probably for 5-6 draftees. I’d be interested in your draft trading up two to three times, as that’s what beane has historically done Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScorpionZero Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 8 minutes ago, Turbo44 said: I think all the trades looks reasonable but I don’t like the strategy. Buffalo needs quality not quantity, so I see them trading up at least once, maybe twice in rd’s 1-4 and end up drafting 7-8 players. No need to use 11 of picks cuz only roster space probably for 5-6 draftees. I’d be interested in your draft trading up two to three times, as that’s what beane has historically done Understood Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Who Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 (edited) 11 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said: Okay, there's no way Jordan Jefferson is there at #248. The model is way messed up to let that happen. I don't really like Kinchens. I'd rather take Bullard or Cole Bishop there, though #60 is too rich. But nice job, and I'll forgive it, because you somehow ended up with Thomas. If that happens, I'm going to imbibe a celebratory Guinness. If they take D in the first, I'm going to have a consolatory Guinness. I'm prepared, either way . . . Edited March 17 by Dr. Who Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 Just now, Dr. Who said: Okay, there's no way Jordan Jefferson is there at #248. The model is way messed up to let that happen. I don't really like Kinchens. I'd rather take Bullard or Cole there, though #60 is too rich. But nice job, and I'll forgive it, because you somehow ended up with Thomas. If that happens, I'm going to imbibe a celebratory Guinness. If they take D in the first, I'm going to have a consolatory Guinness. I'm prepared, either way . . . Yeah, pretty much all of the Simulators rankings are f-cked. Honestly, they're kind of a waste of time. I've yet to find one where I think it's pretty spot on. And there's always a handful of players on the board at spots where I'm like "no way". Like Jefferson. I'd already taken Jackson and Hall, but then I'm looking over my options at 248 and thought "wait, what?". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScorpionZero Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 Buffalo Receives: 2024: Round 1, Pick 15 Indianapolis Receives: 2024: Round 1, Pick 28 2024: Round 2, Pick 60 Buffalo Receives: 2024: Round 3, Pick 80 2024: Round 4, Pick 115 Cincinnati Receives: 2024: Round 4, Pick 128 2024: Round 5, Pick 160 2024: Round 6, Pick 196 2024: Round 7, Pick 248 My Selections 15 Brian Thomas Jr. WR | LSU TRADE 80 Blake Corum RB | Michigan TRADE 115 Ben Sinnott TE | Kansas State TRADE 134 Dadrion Taylor-Demerson S | Texas Tech 144 Mekhi Wingo DL | LSU 163 Nehemiah Pritchett CB | Auburn 200 Zion Tupuola-Fetui EDGE | Washington 204 Dwight McGlothern CB | Arkansas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Noggin Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 Having fun exploring what happens if the Bills DON'T obsess about WR early and instead go BPA. This draft would upset so many Bills fans, but wow what an immediate transformation of the d-line and secondary: 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Who Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Richard Noggin said: Having fun exploring what happens if the Bills DON'T obsess about WR early and instead go BPA. This draft would upset so many Bills fans, but wow what an immediate transformation of the d-line and secondary: Newton is good. He's going to split time with Ed Oliver. Take the same draft and replace Newton with Mitchell, and it's excellent, and has more transformative capacity. Also, I keep seeing Lloyd around that pick. I'd rather grab Braelon Allen, but he's probably gone before then. I'd prefer Isaiah Davis or Dylan Laube at #134 if that was an option. Edited March 17 by Dr. Who 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuvian Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 I don't know where OT Joe Alt is going to go but when he plays against us I'll be there with a CTRL, ALT, DELETE sign 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScorpionZero Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScorpionZero Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 With Thomas and AD gone dropped back twice picking up quality not quantity. Balanced draft. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScorpionZero Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 Trade Recap Buffalo Receives: 2024: Round 1, Pick 15 Indianapolis Receives: 2024: Round 1, Pick 28 2024: Round 2, Pick 60 Buffalo Receives: 2024: Round 4, Pick 107 New York Receives: 2024: Round 4, Pick 134 2024: Round 5, Pick 163 2024: Round 6, Pick 204 2024: Round 7, Pick 248 My Selections 15 Brian Thomas Jr. WR | LSU TRADE 107 Cole Bishop S | Utah TRADE 128 DeWayne Carter DL | Duke 144 Nehemiah Pritchett CB | Auburn 160 Mason McCormick IOL | South Dakota State 189 Jalyx Hunt EDGE | Houston Baptist 200 Isaac Guerendo RB | Louisville 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBFL Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 (edited) 35 minutes ago, ScorpionZero said: With Thomas and AD gone dropped back twice picking up quality not quantity. Balanced draft. Think if any, the first 2 are switched if you come away with them. Don’t want to keep believing or stating so but that Darius Robinson kid could be something. #60 as his landing spot is highly improbable, even #43… Edited March 17 by BBFL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Who Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 PFN updated their board for St. Patty's Day. This is my favorite so far. Traded back a bit to pick up a third. Don't care if folks don't like the double dip, etc. etc., it would be a great draft. BUF 30. Adonai MitchellWR Texas 60. Ladd McConkeyWR Georgia 93. Javon BullardS Georgia 128. DeWayne CarterDT Duke 134. Tanor BortoliniOC Wisconsin 144. Jordan JeffersonDT LSU 160. Cedric JohnsonEDGE Ole Miss 163. Jaylon CarliesS Missouri 189. Isaac GuerendoRB Louisville 200. Dylan McMahonOG NC State 204. Nehemiah PritchettCB Auburn 248. Anim DankwahOT Howard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBFL Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 Also, for shts and giggles, ran one as Chicago… Buffalo gave up 28, 1st and 2nd in 2025 to get to 9. Drafted Odunze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScorpionZero Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 (edited) Latu was ranked 26th so I had to take him. Edited March 17 by ScorpionZero 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 (edited) Not exactly a mock draft, but I've been playing around with scenarios to get us a 3rd round pick back, using the DraftTek trade value chart. Here's two I've come up with: Scenario #1: Trade back from #28 to #36 with Washington. This makes sense for Washington because they also have pick #40, so I could see them wanting to get back into the 1st round rather than making two 2nd round picks in a row. In exchange we would get #100 from them (the last pick of the 3rd round), and a favorable late round swap - our #189 for their #139. Total trade value is 215 points given up for us, 216 points for them. Perfect. In this scenario our picks would look like this: R2 #4 R2 #28 - R3 #36 - R4 #28 R4 #34 - R5 #4 R5 #9 R5 #25 R5 #28 - R6 #24 R6 #28 - R7 #28 Knowing Beane, he would use a couple of those 5th rounders to trade up higher in R3 or R4, or perhaps one of the 4th rounders to move up higher in R2. This is my preferred scenario. I think at least one of the 1st round caliber WRs will still be on the board at #36 because of how strong the class is. But perhaps Beane really loves a WR on the board at #28 and doesn't want to risk losing them, which I could forgive. In that case... Scenario #2: Trade back from #60 to #66 with Arizona. Once again this makes sense for Arizona because they still have two other picks in the 3rd round. They would end up with two 1sts, two 2nds, and two 3rds with this trade. Good haul for a rebuilding team. In exchange we get their #104 for our #128. Total trade value is 107 points given up for us, 109 points given up for them. Again, pretty much perfect. This scenario would also feature a trade up back into the 3rd round with a different team, using #104 that we got from Arizona. I look at Tampa Bay as a good option because they have minimal day three picks, zero in the 5th round actually. We get #92 in exchange for #104 and #163. This is an equal trade value of 43 points for both sides. In this scenario our picks would look like this: R1 #28 - R3 #2 R3 #28 - R4 #34 - R5 #9 R5 #25 - R6 #13 R6 #24 R6 #28 - R7 #28 Also while doing this exercise I discovered that I have way too much free time. Edited March 17 by HappyDays 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Who Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 10 minutes ago, HappyDays said: Not exactly a mock draft, but I've been playing around with scenarios to get us a 3rd round pick back, using the DraftTek trade value chart. Here's two I've come up with: Scenario #1: Trade back from #28 to #36 with Washington. This makes sense for Washington because they also have pick #40, so I could see them wanting to get back into the 1st round rather than making two 2nd round picks in a row. In exchange we would get #100 from them (the last pick of the 3rd round), and a favorable late round swap - our #189 for their #139. Total trade value is 215 points given up for us, 216 points for them. Perfect. In this scenario our picks would look like this: R2 #4 R2 #28 - R3 #36 - R4 #28 R4 #34 - R5 #4 R5 #9 R5 #25 R5 #28 - R6 #24 R6 #28 - R7 #28 Knowing Beane, he would use a couple of those 5th rounders to trade up higher in R3 or R4, or perhaps one of the 4th rounders to move up higher in R2. This is my preferred scenario. I think at least one of the 1st round caliber WRs will still be on the board at #36 because of how strong the class is. But perhaps Beane really loves a WR on the board at #28 and doesn't want to risk losing them, which I could forgive. In that case... Scenario #2: Trade back from #60 to #66 with Arizona. Once again this makes sense for Arizona because they still have two other picks in the 3rd round. They would end up with two 1sts, two 2nds, and two 3rds with this trade. Good haul for a rebuilding team. In exchange we get their #104 for our #128. Total trade value is 107 points given up for us, 109 points given up for them. Again, pretty much perfect. This scenario would also feature a trade up back into the 3rd round with a different team, using #104 that we got from Arizona. I look at Tampa Bay as a good option because they have minimal day three picks, zero in the 5th round actually. We get #92 in exchange for #104 and #163. This is an equal trade value of 43 points for both sides. In this scenario our picks would look like this: R1 #28 - R3 #2 R3 #28 - R4 #34 - R5 #9 R5 #25 - R6 #13 R6 #24 R6 #28 - R7 #28 Also while doing this exercise I discovered that I have way too much free time. What do you make of the news that the Bills have a private work out with Troy Franklin? I had dropped him a round after his terrible Combine and coming in lighter and shorter than expected. Apparently he was ill right before or at the Combine, and is back to 180 lbs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBFL Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 (edited) 25 minutes ago, HappyDays said: Not exactly a mock draft, but I've been playing around with scenarios to get us a 3rd round pick back, using the DraftTek trade value chart. Here's two I've come up with: Scenario #1: Trade back from #28 to #36 with Washington. This makes sense for Washington because they also have pick #40, so I could see them wanting to get back into the 1st round rather than making two 2nd round picks in a row. In exchange we would get #100 from them (the last pick of the 3rd round), and a favorable late round swap - our #189 for their #139. Total trade value is 215 points given up for us, 216 points for them. Perfect. In this scenario our picks would look like this: R2 #4 R2 #28 - R3 #36 - R4 #28 R4 #34 - R5 #4 R5 #9 R5 #25 R5 #28 - R6 #24 R6 #28 - R7 #28 Knowing Beane, he would use a couple of those 5th rounders to trade up higher in R3 or R4, or perhaps one of the 4th rounders to move up higher in R2. This is my preferred scenario. I think at least one of the 1st round caliber WRs will still be on the board at #36 because of how strong the class is. But perhaps Beane really loves a WR on the board at #28 and doesn't want to risk losing them, which I could forgive. In that case... Scenario #2: Trade back from #60 to #66 with Arizona. Once again this makes sense for Arizona because they still have two other picks in the 3rd round. They would end up with two 1sts, two 2nds, and two 3rds with this trade. Good haul for a rebuilding team. In exchange we get their #104 for our #128. Total trade value is 107 points given up for us, 109 points given up for them. Again, pretty much perfect. This scenario would also feature a trade up back into the 3rd round with a different team, using #104 that we got from Arizona. I look at Tampa Bay as a good option because they have minimal day three picks, zero in the 5th round actually. We get #92 in exchange for #104 and #163. This is an equal trade value of 43 points for both sides. In this scenario our picks would look like this: R1 #28 - R3 #2 R3 #28 - R4 #34 - R5 #9 R5 #25 - R6 #13 R6 #24 R6 #28 - R7 #28 Also while doing this exercise I discovered that I have way too much free time. That’s awesome and I’m with you on the preferred scenario. Hopefully if the trade up doesn’t happen and value is limited @ 28 they execute something similar. Edited March 17 by BBFL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBFL Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: Wouldn’t be mad at that at all… 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 11 minutes ago, Dr. Who said: What do you make of the news that the Bills have a private work out with Troy Franklin? I had dropped him a round after his terrible Combine and coming in lighter and shorter than expected. Apparently he was ill right before or at the Combine, and is back to 180 lbs. I didn't see the report until you mentioned it just now but it makes sense. I'm sure we are fully scouting and vetting every WR likely to go between picks 20 and 40. I'll admit I'm not as high on Franklin as I was when I first looked into the WR class. His size does concern me a bit, especially since our WRs have had annual issues winning against physical coverage in the playoffs. So I think I have decided I would prefer Coleman or Leggette over him. But it is a slight preference. Franklin's play speed and route running still excite me. And those are my top 3 WR choices for sure, I don't see my opinion on that changing between now and draft day. Any WR we take besides those 3 I will be somewhat less excited about, although still satisfied that we drafted a WR. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 I had to trade next years first to get Washington’s 2 seconds and a third next season. Got another third next year in a trade with Seattle. My first 3 picks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigvinny Posted March 18 Author Share Posted March 18 Fanspeak, draft diamonds big board. 28: R1 P28 WR Troy Franklin - Oregon 60: R2 P28 S Tyler Nubin - Minnesota 128: R4 P28 DL Dewayne Carter - Duke 134: R4 P34 WR Jamari Thrash - Louisville 144: R5 P9 C Kingsley Eguakun - Florida 160: R5 P25 EDGE Jalyx Hunt - Houston Christian 163: R5 P28 DL Keith Randolph - Illinois 196: R6 P20 CB Deantre Prince - Mississippi 200: R6 P24 OT Garret Greenfield - South Dakota State 204: R6 P28 EDGE Javontae Jean-Baptiste - Notre Dame 248: R7 P28 RB Frank Gore Jr. - Southern Miss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hjnick Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 6 hours ago, ScorpionZero said: Latu was ranked 26th so I had to take him. beebe will solidify that line if McGovern goes to Center. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Noggin Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 Skipped over Coleman, Mitchell, Worthy, plus Newton and DeJean at 28 in favor of a trade-back for two 2nd rounders. Just to see. And to be honest, I really like the results. 12 dudes won't make the 53, but this draft beefs up several pipelines (WR, RB, DT, S) and adds solid depth at IOL, CB, and DE. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.