BillStime Posted March 4 Author Share Posted March 4 👆 🤡 When you constantly need to remind everyone about the purpose of Moms for Hiter... lmao 29 minutes ago, B-Man said: Quick reminder for the board of what Moms for Liberty is truly addressing. 3 hours ago, B-Man said: back to what they are standing for. 15 hours ago, B-Man said: What Moms for Liberty is REALLY all about: 16 hours ago, B-Man said: What Moms for Liberty is really about. On 2/9/2024 at 4:22 PM, B-Man said: More about what Moms for Liberty are really addressing On 2/9/2024 at 11:29 AM, B-Man said: Quick reminder: On 2/6/2024 at 3:18 PM, B-Man said: What it is all about. On 12/1/2023 at 5:48 PM, B-Man said: Here is a link for those of you interested. You won't really be surprised about how they have been mischaracterized here. https://portal.momsforliberty.org/about/ On 9/24/2023 at 10:15 AM, B-Man said: Reminder Thread title is incorrect. The result of the O.P's bigotry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDHillFan Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 4 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: Moms For Liberty is the classic astro-turf group, created by a bunch of Republican activists masquerading as regular old "concerned moms." That is why Bridget Ziegler's role and personal life is - and will always be - relevant. It exposed the organization for what it really is. Phony. A lot of you fell for it hook, line, and sinker. The cure for being embarrassed doesn't start with biting again. 130k members seems like a lot for an astroturf group. Maybe not. Aside from the hypocrisy/threesome concerns that have you exercised, is there something about this group’s aims that bother you? Are you buying in on the title of this thread? Are these bags/milfs: white supremacists? ANTI LGTBQ? (I thought it was always LGBTQ. Maybe the op has a reason for putting T before B. Seems likely) Extremist? A hate group? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 1 minute ago, JDHillFan said: 130k members seems like a lot for an astroturf group. Maybe not. Aside from the hypocrisy/threesome concerns that have you exercised, is there something about this group’s aims that bother you? Are you buying in on the title of this thread? Are these bags/milfs: white supremacists? ANTI LGTBQ? (I thought it was always LGBTQ. Maybe the op has a reason for putting T before B. Seems likely) Extremist? A hate group? tread lightly when getting in-between a momma bear and her cubs! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 38 minutes ago, BillStime said: When you constantly need to remind everyone about the purpose of Moms for Hiter... I assume that you meant "Hitler" I also assume that you were typing with one hand It's fairly clear to anyone who was reading my posts that I used those qualifiers as a way of redirecting the thread back to the point and away from your long list of drivel But you fitting it to your fantasies is certainly consistent for you. . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 4 Author Share Posted March 4 Just now, B-Man said: I assume that you meant "Hitler" I also assume that you were typing with one hand It's fairly clear to anyone who was reading my posts that I used those qualifiers as a way of redirecting the thread back to the point and away from your long list of drivel But you fitting it to your fantasies is certainly consistent for you. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 Back to the thread: The correct answer for the "They're trying to tell us what my kids can read" crowd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Back to the thread: The correct answer for the "They're trying to tell us what my kids can read" crowd No, but if you’re giving young children gay pornography to read, I think the police might have a say about that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 27 minutes ago, Westside said: No, but if you’re giving young children gay pornography to read, I think the police might have a say about that. I had access (not through, umm, official channels) only to straight pr0n. Which, I assume, is why I am straight. Which brings me to my question: underlying all the storm and fury about exposing kids to "gay pr0n" isn't there a fear that your kids are going to be turned gay? Assuming you are straight, do you really believe that you could be gay today if you found a stash of gay pr0n in your brother's closet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 Just now, The Frankish Reich said: I had access (not through, umm, official channels) only to straight pr0n. Which, I assume, is why I am straight. Which brings me to my question: underlying all the storm and fury about exposing kids to "gay pr0n" isn't there a fear that your kids are going to be turned gay? Assuming you are straight, do you really believe that you could be gay today if you found a stash of gay pr0n in your brother's closet? Neither gay nor straight porn should be in school libraries. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 Just now, Doc said: Neither gay nor straight porn should be in school libraries. Period. Then why does everyone recite the mantra "gay porn" like @Westside just did? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenhigh Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 4 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: I had access (not through, umm, official channels) only to straight pr0n. Which, I assume, is why I am straight. Which brings me to my question: underlying all the storm and fury about exposing kids to "gay pr0n" isn't there a fear that your kids are going to be turned gay? Assuming you are straight, do you really believe that you could be gay today if you found a stash of gay pr0n in your brother's closet? Why don't you do some deep research on. the topic for a few months and then get back to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 1 minute ago, Tenhigh said: Why don't you do some deep research on. the topic for a few months and then get back to us. Every man hates what he has to deny. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenhigh Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 Just now, The Frankish Reich said: Every man hates what he has to deny. Then you are accepting the challenge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 Just now, Tenhigh said: Then you are accepting the challenge? Challenge to do what? I am saying that there is an underlying belief here, and that without that belief many of these comments make zero sense. 3 hours ago, B-Man said: 10% of home schoolers: incredibly devoted parents who have the intellectual ability and discipline to provide a top-notch education to their children. 90% of home schoolers: the opposite. That's why some standards are necessary, but the home school lawyer-zealots fight ANY standard tooth and nail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenhigh Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 Just now, The Frankish Reich said: Challenge to do what? I am saying that there is an underlying belief here, and that without that belief many of these comments make zero sense. I challenged you to do first hand research on gay pron and report your findings, ya dufus. Or are you a bigot who hates LGBTQ? I am kidding, obviously. To your point, I am curious what the rate of what qualifies as pron to MFL in the school libraries falls along the straight/gay lines. If I had to bet it's disproportionately weighted toward gay. But maybe not? Who can even answer that question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 1 minute ago, Tenhigh said: I am curious what the rate of what qualifies as pron to MFL in the school libraries falls along the straight/gay lines. If I had to bet it's disproportionately weighted toward gay. I think you're right. I think that a lot of gay/trans material gets a pass because it is considered under the rubric of making kids feel like they're not alone, even if it crosses the line into what is definitely age-inappropriate. I have no problem with parents (moms, if you will) getting involved and trying to influence what school libraries have on the shelves, or at least making sure that those materials are age appropriate. But as for this specific group - Moms for Liberty - yes, I believe at least at the start it was a classic astro-turf (not grassroots) group, and that it's primary purpose is to publicize liberal overreach (and as such, to try to swing those all-important suburban moms toward Republicans) rather than to improve true education for kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenhigh Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 12 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: I think you're right. I think that a lot of gay/trans material gets a pass because it is considered under the rubric of making kids feel like they're not alone, even if it crosses the line into what is definitely age-inappropriate. I have no problem with parents (moms, if you will) getting involved and trying to influence what school libraries have on the shelves, or at least making sure that those materials are age appropriate. But as for this specific group - Moms for Liberty - yes, I believe at least at the start it was a classic astro-turf (not grassroots) group, and that it's primary purpose is to publicize liberal overreach (and as such, to try to swing those all-important suburban moms toward Republicans) rather than to improve true education for kids. That's where all of these grass roots groups end up anyway, so what's the difference? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 31 minutes ago, Tenhigh said: That's where all of these grass roots groups end up anyway, so what's the difference? It's kind of like Black Lives Matter. What nonracist can disagree with the sentiment behind the name? But then there's the reality of the grifters and political hacks who co-opted the name for their self-serving purposes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Here we go again. Frito-Lay this time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 5 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Here we go again. Frito-Lay this time? Call it out as disgusting and this woke virtue signaling fad goes away. Unless you enjoy explaining to 9 year olds what this means. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 2 hours ago, Big Blitz said: So since literally nobody in the USA knows who this is, I had to look it up. Some trans performer in Spain, retained to do some PR for Spanish Doritos, owned by Frito-Lay, in turn owned by Pepsi. Please continue to Streisand Effect this bizarre personality, and let me know the list of which products I cannot buy or consume. I assume it will go beyond Spanish Doritos? This one gonna hit Bills fans hard. (Why does Spain even have Doritos? Buy those wickedly good Jamon flavored potato chips instead!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 It's alright. Moms for Liberty taped the WHOLE interview and have provided what CBS selectively edited out. Only the lemmings are fooled '60 Minutes' Airs Hit Piece on Moms for Liberty and 'Books Bans' That Reeks of Bias By Jennifer Oliver O'Connell A 60 Minutes segment featuring Moms for Liberty co-founders Tiffany Justice and Tina Descovich aired on Sunday, to much controversy. Titled "97 Books," correspondent Scott Pelley outlined the “growing trend of right-wing book bans.” No bias there, whatsoever. Pelley grilled the co-founders of the organization about their campaign to remove books from school libraries that they deemed offensive, and why they insist on using the term "groomer" to describe people who insist children should have access to these books. The interview went as expected: Pelley produced the legacy media hit job with closed-ended questions and narrative massaging cuts and lead-ins. https://redstate.com/jenniferoo/2024/03/04/cbs-60-minutes-brought-a-knife-to-a-gunfight-with-moms-for-liberty-and-regrets-doing-so-n2170911 I encourage you to read the entire article for the truth, I know that it is too long for PPP's poorer posters. . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 On 3/4/2024 at 7:15 PM, The Frankish Reich said: Here we go again. Frito-Lay this time? Annnnnnnd gone……congrats for sticking up for this - immediately went to de facto “must not agree with anything conservatives say” mode. Pathetic. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 6 Author Share Posted March 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 1 hour ago, Big Blitz said: Annnnnnnd gone……congrats for sticking up for this - immediately went to de facto “must not agree with anything conservatives say” mode. Pathetic. Is it safe to eat Doritos again? And meanwhile, you continue to force us to look at that. Like those old Peter Pan images that used to show up all the time ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 6 Author Share Posted March 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 We need more of this And moms for Liberty endorses him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 6 Author Share Posted March 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 Nate is right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 On 3/6/2024 at 5:38 AM, Tommy Callahan said: We need more of this And moms for Liberty endorses him. In which we pause for a few seconds to consider this: Moms For Liberty endorses a candidate nostalgic for the days when women were not allowed to vote. And still they say they play on natural turf, not astroturf ... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDHillFan Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said: In which we pause for a few seconds to consider this: Moms For Liberty endorses a candidate nostalgic for the days when women were not allowed to vote. https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/03/06/mark-robinson-women-vote/ I know you are all about shooting straight and having context matter. Except when it comes to that whole harassment of Jews being ignored in favor of a white guys in Buffalo parable. Anyway, let the noted righty fact checkers at snopes educate you a smidge. That way you won’t have to repeat this over and over. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Just now, JDHillFan said: https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/03/06/mark-robinson-women-vote/ I know you are all about shooting straight and having context matter. Except when it comes to that whole harassment of Jews being ignored in favor of a white guys in Buffalo parable. Anyway, let the noted righty fact checkers at snopes educate you a smidge. That way you won’t have to repeat this over and over. I read the initial Red State "rebuttal." Yes, there was additional "context" but even that context leaves me wondering what the hell he was trying to say. A reporter asked, fairly, something like this: MAGA suggests, by its very name, that America was better/greater at some past time. When was that time? A little prodding and we get to the pre-19th Amendment suffrage days. And he says, "Yes!" I want to go back to those days (and then explains) because in those days Republicans fought for social change. What? You want to go back to a time when there was a horrible deprivation of freedom because that spurred a political party to take a stand against such horrible deprivation of freedom? If people are confused, it is because it is an incoherent thought. Do we want to go back to the days of slavery because, well, there would have been no Republican Party without an abolitionist movement? Stupid comment regardless of the point he thought he was making, and he's still got lots of explaining to do. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDHillFan Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 4 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Stupid comment regardless Equally stupid to pretend what you did initially but I guess it was important to make it more scary as it was intended as a slap to those awful soccer moms speaking out. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 (edited) It's kind of basic to a lot of folks. hard work equates to positive results. Bad actions equate to negative results. Where people drive the economy. Not state stimulus and spending bills Functioning economic policies Just to name a few. But you run with the discredited sex card the alt left tried to attack him with. Edited March 7 by Tommy Callahan 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts