Jump to content

Transsurrection in TN, MT, TX, IA: All the documented events that aren't happening.


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:


Sure, that’s what we have child endangerment and decency laws for. 
 

Thank you for pointing out that these book bans are unnecessary.


nobody is enforcing them. I find it funny that when these parents start reading from the books that they can’t broadcast them on local television but they’re according to you appropriate for children. Make it make sense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Hey look. @ChiGoose with constant hand waving strawmen, ignoring receipts and telling everyone else that they are the idiots living in a bubble.

 

Such a refreshing change of pace from our former republican turned commie.

Lol. I thought you blocked me. Pathetic. 
 

 

4 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


nobody is enforcing them. I find it funny that when these parents start reading from the books that they can’t broadcast them on local television but they’re according to you appropriate for children. Make it make sense 


So it’s ok for the government to have laws criminalizing books so long as they pinky swear not to enforce them?

 

This is modern conservatism?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

And then they'll call YOU a fascist when you provide dozens of receipts showing that it is, IN FACT, happening. 

 

Think about that for a moment....

 

We are dealing with pure commie evil.


Evil?  You freaks are beyond repair

 

image.thumb.jpeg.cac8a5ec3d9082739264ce088b03adb4.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.9dbb7112b0f2b5955b872c08bf722ecb.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.8d339b1d505da35f906b75ae1a6f048e.jpeg

 

Look at these faces and you simpletons are manipulated over LGTBQ?

 

Do you think kids just pick and choose what sexuality they WANT to be?

 

When the F did you decide to be straight?
 

You supporting guns over people is FN evil you pathetic simps.

 

You do realize that’s all your are - a SIMP.

 

When this is what your party is running on while kids are slaughtered at school - you are a SIMP.

 

The fact that you think this is NORMAL - makes you a pathetic simp.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BillStime said:

It’s so nice to see the cult care about what kids are taught at school….
 

What’s sad is their care only goes so far as they don’t mind kids getting slaughtered at school.

 

Chris Rufo thanks these idiots for their endless support.

 

I bet those 9 year old kids in Nashville were looking forward to Easter today… instead; their families are crushed and devastated thanks to insecure MAGA gun nuts.

 

Yeah - but keep biching about LGTBQ you pathetic simps.

 

When you start to support gun control I’ll start to care about your FEELINGS about LGTBQ.

 

Idiots 

 

fn idiots 

 

Why can’t you do both?

 

Why are your values contingent on what other people think? 
 

Answer- Because they are not values…

 

Values are something you have despite what other people think…

 

Furthermore, most people do support a certain level of gun control…the issue is that not everyone’s idea of gun control is the same…

 

So basically, you are saying that once  everyone thinks the exact same way you do about guns, then maybe you will start to care about perverts and pedo’s pushing porn and irreversible, life altering drugs and surgeries on kids…Great- thanks for playing…😉

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just the next stop on the liberal perversion train. 

 

The pronoun pushing transgender movement has been mainstream for a while, check. 

 

Let's make sure that gender reassignment in children/minors is common, check.

 

Next stop, legalizing sex with minors.  If children can choose their gender, they should be able to choose when and with whom they can have sex, correct?

 

I'm not sure what comes after that, perhaps legalization of bestiality? 

 

This might sound far-fetched but who would have thought we would have reached a point where we need to debate having drag shows and sexually explicit material in elementary schools?  

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Why can’t you do both?

 

Why are your values contingent on what other people think? 
 

Answer- Because they are not values…

 

Values are something you have despite what other people think…

 

Furthermore, most people do support a certain level of gun control…the issue is that not everyone’s idea of gun control is the same…

 

So basically, you are saying that once  everyone thinks the exact same way you do about guns, then maybe you will start to care about perverts and pedo’s pushing porn and irreversible, life altering drugs and surgeries on kids…Great- thanks for playing…😉

 

Another pathetic simp endorsing the SLAUGHTER of kids at school.

 

gtfoh

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Another pathetic simp endorsing the SLAUGHTER of kids at school.

 

gtfoh

 

Sure, create another lie because you have nothing else of substance to offer…

 

Anymore gems like this? 😉

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Another pathetic simp endorsing the SLAUGHTER of kids at school.

 

gtfoh

 


there is a bill out there supporting securing school. We’ve sent hundreds of billions no questions asked to Ukraine we can afford to secure our schools. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Precision said:

This is just the next stop on the liberal perversion train. 

 

The pronoun pushing transgender movement has been mainstream for a while, check. 

 

Let's make sure that gender reassignment in children/minors is common, check.

 

Next stop, legalizing sex with minors.  If children can choose their gender, they should be able to choose when and with whom they can have sex, correct?

 

I'm not sure what comes after that, perhaps legalization of bestiality? 

 

This might sound far-fetched but who would have thought we would have reached a point where we need to debate having drag shows and sexually explicit material in elementary schools?  


This is the kind of brains worms stupidity that right wing activists and GOP leaders take advantage of. 
 

This post is obviously the insane drooling of a truly broken person. GOP leaders have nothing but contempt for their voters and push this nonsense because they think the rubes will buy it and come to the polls. 
 

If children were really being sexualized, the perpetrators would already be charged under existing law. 
 

If drag shows for kids were actually sexual, the performers would be charged under existing child endangerment laws. 
 

But it’s all lies. Drag shows for kids are as sexual as Chuck E Cheese. If a performer does cross the line, they can be charged under existing law. It basically never happens because, once again, these shows aren’t sexual (unless seeing a man in a dress gives you a tingly feeling down there. But that’s really on you).

 

You’re all being played for fools and you seem so willing to lap it up. Bunch of “conservatives” asking for big daddy government to come in and tell them what to do. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Precision said:

 

 

Live shot of DR

 

giphy.gif

 

Meanwhile:

 

5 minutes ago, Precision said:

Next stop, legalizing sex with minors.

 

Well, look at this you pathetic simp:

 

Republicans Make a Case for Child Marriage

 

6 minutes ago, Precision said:

This might sound far-fetched but who would have thought we would have reached a point where we need to debate having drag shows and sexually explicit material in elementary schools?  

 

 

FAR FETCHED?  You're BICHING about something not happening and KIDS ARE GETTING SLAUGHTERED AT SCHOOL?

 

You FREAKS are not serious.

 

3 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


there is a bill out there supporting securing school. We’ve sent hundreds of billions no questions asked to Ukraine we can afford to secure our schools. 

 

Secure schools?

 

Secure buses?

 

Secure school parking lots?

 

Secure athletic fields?

 

OR BAN GUNS

 

Or go cry about things not happening at school you pathetic simp

 

 

 

6 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Sure, create another lie

 

Lie?  You lie to yourself every day what's the fn difference.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


This is the kind of brains worms stupidity that right wing activists and GOP leaders take advantage of. 
 

This post is obviously the insane drooling of a truly broken person. GOP leaders have nothing but contempt for their voters and push this nonsense because they think the rubes will buy it and come to the polls. 
 

If children were really being sexualized, the perpetrators would already be charged under existing law. 
 

If drag shows for kids were actually sexual, the performers would be charged under existing child endangerment laws. 
 

But it’s all lies. Drag shows for kids are as sexual as Chuck E Cheese. If a performer does cross the line, they can be charged under existing law. It basically never happens because, once again, these shows aren’t sexual (unless seeing a man in a dress gives you a tingly feeling down there. But that’s really on you).

 

You’re all being played for fools and you seem so willing to lap it up. Bunch of “conservatives” asking for big daddy government to come in and tell them what to do. 

 

You're such a dumb liberal pervert.  Getting you to respond like you did was like fishing for a sucker.  I'm sitting here on the big screen with my wife laughing at you right now, it was so easy.  I 'm like "hey wife you want to see a loser respond right away.....watch".   Ha ha ha ha!

 

Hey, I have to ask do you even have a job?  A little insight, anyone with a real job doesn't post all day every day.

Edited by Precision
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Precision said:

 

This might sound far-fetched but who would have thought we would have reached a point where we need to debate having drag shows and sexually explicit material in elementary schools?  

 

The commies would have thought so, because it's their plan.

 

 

Imagine ten years ago a question in an election debate to candidates around should books describing graphic sexual activities be available on public school library shelves for 3rd and 4th graders to read.

 

10 years ago that's the biggest softball question of all time. Of course no, next question.

 

Today if you asked that question the moderator asking it would be attacked as a transphobe by the commie candidate.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


This is the kind of brains worms stupidity that right wing activists and GOP leaders take advantage of. 
 

This post is obviously the insane drooling of a truly broken person. GOP leaders have nothing but contempt for their voters and push this nonsense because they think the rubes will buy it and come to the polls. 
 

If children were really being sexualized, the perpetrators would already be charged under existing law. 
 

If drag shows for kids were actually sexual, the performers would be charged under existing child endangerment laws. 
 

But it’s all lies. Drag shows for kids are as sexual as Chuck E Cheese. If a performer does cross the line, they can be charged under existing law. It basically never happens because, once again, these shows aren’t sexual (unless seeing a man in a dress gives you a tingly feeling down there. But that’s really on you).

 

You’re all being played for fools and you seem so willing to lap it up. Bunch of “conservatives” asking for big daddy government to come in and tell them what to do. 


why even have the drag shows in schools in the first place? Just leave them out. Simple fix. They can have them all they want outside of schools. Nobody had a problem with them before outside the schools 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


why even have the drag shows in schools in the first place? Just leave them out. Simple fix. They can have them all they want outside of schools. Nobody had a problem with them before outside the schools 


Why have guns at school?

 

Why force ten year olds to have babies? 
 

Why do you support under age marriage? 
 

 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

The commies would have thought so, because it's their plan.

 

 

Imagine ten years ago a question in an election debate to candidates around should books describing graphic sexual activities be available on public school library shelves for 3rd and 4th graders to read.

 

10 years ago that's the biggest softball question of all time. Of course no, next question.

 

Today if you asked that question the moderator asking it would be attacked as a transphobe by the commie candidate.


Imagine 10 years ago if someone asked should the government censor books under penalty of being charged with a crime.
 

10 years ago, that’s the biggest softball question of all time. Of course no, next question. 
 

Today, if you asked that question, the moderator would be attacked as a pedo by the right (which ironically used to oppose such kinds of government interference).

 

13 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


why even have the drag shows in schools in the first place? Just leave them out. Simple fix. They can have them all they want outside of schools. Nobody had a problem with them before outside the schools 

 

Why have children’s entertainers? Simple fix. No more child entertainers. 
 

And the idea that the issue is only with them in schools is laughable in face of the actions being taken agains drag performers in places that aren’t schools. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

The commies would have thought so, because it's their plan.

 

 

Imagine ten years ago a question in an election debate to candidates around should books describing graphic sexual activities be available on public school library shelves for 3rd and 4th graders to read.

 

10 years ago that's the biggest softball question of all time. Of course no, next question.

 

Today if you asked that question the moderator asking it would be attacked as a transphobe by the commie candidate.

What it boils down to is there is an extremely small minority of people with unacceptably low moral and ethical standards of behavior attempting to impose these low standards of behavior on the other 99.99% of the population.  And they're being backed and bankrolled by "liberal" donors that see an opportunity to gain more power by championing their views which sow the seeds of conflict among the 99.99%.  Divide and conquer. 

If you think it's okay to expose 5 year old kids to sexual subjects and scenes then social norms define you as a pervert, period.

 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Live shot of DR

 

giphy.gif

 

Meanwhile:

 

 

Well, look at this you pathetic simp:

 

Republicans Make a Case for Child Marriage

 

 

 

FAR FETCHED?  You're BICHING about something not happening and KIDS ARE GETTING SLAUGHTERED AT SCHOOL?

 

You FREAKS are not serious.

 

 

Secure schools?

 

Secure buses?

 

Secure school parking lots?

 

Secure athletic fields?

 

OR BAN GUNS

 

Or go cry about things not happening at school you pathetic simp

 

 

 

 

Lie?  You lie to yourself every day what's the fn difference.

 

 

america burn GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ChiGoose said:


Imagine 10 years ago if someone asked should the government censor books under penalty of being charged with a crime.
 

10 years ago, that’s the biggest softball question of all time. Of course no, next question. 
 

Today, if you asked that question, the moderator would be attacked as a pedo by the right (which ironically used to oppose such kinds of government interference).

 

 

Why have children’s entertainers? Simple fix. No more child entertainers. 
 

And the idea that the issue is only with them in schools is laughable in face of the actions being taken agains drag performers in places that aren’t schools. 


when did they become child entertainers? Lol. The left suddenly became obsessed with having drag shows everywhere. Went from just the usual local drag shows at gay bars or whatever where nobody bothered them. now everywhere so no wonder you have them getting push back. Leave them out of the schools and there are no issues what is the harm in that? Why do they need to be in schools?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

What it boils down to is there is an extremely small minority of people with unacceptably low moral and ethical standards of behavior attempting to impose these low standards of behavior on the other 99.99% of the population.  And they're being backed and bankrolled by "liberal" donors that see an opportunity to gain more power by championing their views which sow the seeds of conflict among the 99.99%.  Divide and conquer. 

If you think it's okay to expose 5 year old kids to sexual subjects and scenes then social norms define you as a pervert, period.

 

 

 

Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

                                                FrHuXrRWcAAgR78?format=jpg&name=large

 

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


when did they become child entertainers? Lol. The left suddenly became obsessed with having drag shows everywhere. Went from just the usual local drag shows at gay bars or whatever where nobody bothered them. now everywhere so no wonder you have them getting push back. Leave them out of the schools and there are no issues what is the harm in that? Why do they need to be in schools?


If you don’t want a drag show in your kid’s school, get involved and talk to the administrator.

 

The problem here is with the government criminalizing it instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:


If you don’t want a drag show in your kid’s school, get involved and talk to the administrator.

 

The problem here is with the government criminalizing it instead. 


because they keep putting it in schools. If the admins disagree or anyone disagrees with it you get called transphobic and get fired. You realize you cannot disagree with them in any way without getting called transphobic?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


because they keep putting it in schools. If the admins disagree or anyone disagrees with it you get called transphobic and get fired. You realize you cannot disagree with them in any way without getting called transphobic?  


Most of the stories I’ve found have been schools employees being suspended or fired for allowing drag shows, not opposing them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:


Most of the stories I’ve found have been schools employees being suspended or fired for allowing drag shows, not opposing them 


https://nypost.com/2022/06/11/over-200k-being-spent-on-drag-queen-shows-at-nyc-schools/amp/

 

over the past few days you’ve been proven wrong on everything we’ve discussed. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


https://nypost.com/2022/06/11/over-200k-being-spent-on-drag-queen-shows-at-nyc-schools/amp/

 

over the past few days you’ve been proven wrong on everything we’ve discussed. 


Claiming that people are being fired for opposing drag and citing an article that does not show people being fired for opposing drag and then claiming victory is the level of intellectual rigor I’ve come to expect from this place. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


Claiming that people are being fired for opposing drag and citing an article that does not show people being fired for opposing drag and then claiming victory is the level of intellectual rigor I’ve come to expect from this place. 


you said people were being fired at schools for having drag not me lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


because they keep putting it in schools. If the admins disagree or anyone disagrees with it you get called transphobic and get fired. You realize you cannot disagree with them in any way without getting called transphobic?  


 

13 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


you said people were being fired at schools for having drag not me lol

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


Imagine 10 years ago if someone asked should the government censor books under penalty of being charged with a crime.
 

10 years ago, that’s the biggest softball question of all time. Of course no, next question.  

Certain books have always, always not been available in grade school libraries. This isn't something new. 10 yrs ago we relied on common sense to make that determination. It's a shame that we need laws today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pokebball said:

Certain books have always, always not been available in grade school libraries. This isn't something new. 10 yrs ago we relied on common sense to make that determination. It's a shame that we need laws today.


How very big government of you. Laws telling us what books we can’t read. 
 

Surely you wouldn’t be opposed to California outlawing books that don’t conform to the most pinko commie worldview then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


How very big government of you. Laws telling us what books we can’t read. 
 

Surely you wouldn’t be opposed to California outlawing books that don’t conform to the most pinko commie worldview then?

Great response. This is the type of intellectual rigor I’ve come to expect from you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


How very big government of you. Laws telling us what books we can’t read. 
 

Surely you wouldn’t be opposed to California outlawing books that don’t conform to the most pinko commie worldview then?

The will of the people should decide. You anti democracy? How should it work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

The will of the people should decide. You anti democracy? How should it work?


People should have the freedom to read what they want. School libraries should be curated by librarians with input from the administration and parents. 

The government shouldn’t be able to criminalize books.

 

Nobody should risk being indicted for a crime over a difference on opinion on the appropriateness of a book. 


Good faith discussions with community input will still have contention and disagreement, but that’s fine and to be expected. 
 

It’s the role people are asking the government to play that is a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


People should have the freedom to read what they want. School libraries should be curated by librarians with input from the administration and parents. 

The government shouldn’t be able to criminalize books.

 

Nobody should risk being indicted for a crime over a difference on opinion on the appropriateness of a book. 


Good faith discussions with community input will still have contention and disagreement, but that’s fine and to be expected. 
 

It’s the role people are asking the government to play that is a problem.


the right said books describe kids sucking dick shouldn’t be in school 

the left said they should and kept them there 

the right went hard and decided to criminalize it. 
the left had their chance to get the books out so these are the consequences 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

How very big government of you. Laws telling us what books we can’t read. 
 

Surely you wouldn’t be opposed to California outlawing books that don’t conform to the most pinko commie worldview then?

 

Big government.  LOL!  There are different rules for children.  Always have been, always will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


People should have the freedom to read what they want. School libraries should be curated by librarians with input from the administration and parents. 

The government shouldn’t be able to criminalize books.

 

Nobody should risk being indicted for a crime over a difference on opinion on the appropriateness of a book. 


Good faith discussions with community input will still have contention and disagreement, but that’s fine and to be expected. 
 

It’s the role people are asking the government to play that is a problem.


You’ve been proven wrong on every subject discussed here. It’s amazing to watch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Big government.  LOL!  There are different rules for children.  Always have been, always will be.


Yeah, we have child endangerment laws and decency laws. If the things the right is complaining about are as bad as they are saying, they should charge people under those laws. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


People should have the freedom to read what they want. School libraries should be curated by librarians with input from the administration and parents. 

The government shouldn’t be able to criminalize books.

 

Nobody should risk being indicted for a crime over a difference on opinion on the appropriateness of a book. 


Good faith discussions with community input will still have contention and disagreement, but that’s fine and to be expected. 
 

It’s the role people are asking the government to play that is a problem.

Public schools are the government.

 

Parent's elect their representatives, both legislative and school board.

 

Good faith discussions are a part of the democratic process and people are electing their representatives based on those discussions (campaigns).

 

It sounds to me the process is occurring just as you describe, and you just don't like the result.

 

School employees have never had the final say. public input has always existed. There have always been boundaries. Over the past decade, our govt employees at schools have pushed the envelope. Citizens have reacted to that. And here you are reacting to that reaction. Democracy is working.

Edited by Pokebball
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aristocrat said:


You’ve been proven wrong on every subject discussed here. It’s amazing to watch. 


I mean, only if you can’t read. The levels of Strawman on this thread are astronomical.
 

Saying the government shouldn’t be telling us what we can read or overriding medical professionals is suddenly a radical position to take. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...