The Unreleased J6 Capitol Surveillance Tapes: As Expected Tapes CONFIRM Sham J6 Committee LIED.

[BillsFanNC]

I've gotta tell ya...all these tapes now seeing the light of day that directly contradict the narrative from the sham committee is completely shocking.

 

 

Remember when the The King would chide us about "testimony under oath"

 

 

@ChiGoose

 

 

 

[Big Blitz]

59 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

I've gotta tell ya...all these tapes now seeing the light of day that directly contradict the narrative from the sham committee is completely shocking.

 

 

Remember when the The King would chide us about "testimony under oath"

 

 

@ChiGoose

 

 

 

 

 

Amazing.  

[BillsFanNC]

 

[Irv]

When does the Demented Biden impeachment trial start?

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillStime]

45 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

If only Trump didn’t tell the mob to head to the Capitol he wouldn’t have had to send that Tweet 3+ hours after the Capitol was breached and 29 minutes after Miss American Taliban sacrificed her life for nothing - absolutely nothing.

 

Trump used all of you.

 

 

[B-Man]

 

SO, HE PERJURED HIMSELF? WHERE IS MY SHOCKED FACE?   

 

J6 Celebrity Cop Appears Uninjured in New Video Despite Testimony He Was Going to “Die” on January 6.

 

Capitol Police officer Aquilino Gonell has repeatedly testified under oath and in federal court that he suffered near-death injuries on January 6. New security video contradicts his claims.

 

https://www.declassified.live/p/j6-celebrity-cop-appears-uninjured

 

 

* although, even though there is video, you can 'dismiss' it because . . . . . . . . . Julie Kelly 😆

 

 

.

[BillsFanNC]

Should be interesting.

 

To everyone without their heads buried in the sand that is.

 

 

 

[John from Riverside]

On 7/8/2023 at 3:25 PM, BillsFanNC said:

^^^^

 

I'm sure this "content" is fully deserving of another one....

 

***** you @BillStime

Why are you so triggered all the time you seem constantly upset

On 7/26/2023 at 7:11 PM, BillStime said:

If only Trump didn’t tell the mob to head to the Capitol he wouldn’t have had to send that Tweet 3+ hours after the Capitol was breached and 29 minutes after Miss American Taliban sacrificed her life for nothing - absolutely nothing.

 

Trump used all of you.

 

 

That was a total cover your ass tweet
 

The real question is if he backed the January 6 policeman, why was the national guard not sent out immediately?

 

Trying to make it look like the military is incompetent and can’t spin up support for the capital on a moments notice just makes him look stupid. We can get anywhere anytime and all it would’ve taken is a smole Group armed and we could’ve dispersed that thing before it got out of hand.

5 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Should be interesting.

 

To everyone without their heads buried in the sand that is.

 

 

 

Who?

[BillsFanNC]

^^^

For example..

 

[John from Riverside]

On 7/25/2023 at 12:51 AM, BillsFanNC said:

 

You seem to like this quack Julie Kelly a lot

[ChiGoose]

8 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

You seem to like this quack Julie Kelly a lot

I don’t understand why anyone listens to her if they want to be informed about legal matters. As far as I can tell, she has no training, background, or experience.

 

I guess it just because she tells them what they want to hear. Feelings always over facts for them. 

[Pokebball]

8 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

I don’t understand why anyone listens to her if they want to be informed about legal matters. As far as I can tell, she has no training, background, or experience.

 

I guess it just because she tells them what they want to hear. Feelings always over facts for them. 

She isn't any quackier than many on this board.

[ChiGoose]

2 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

She isn't any quackier than many on this board.

You’re not wrong. Maybe that’s why they like her. She’s a kindred spirit in quackery 

[Pokebball]

8 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

You’re not wrong. Maybe that’s why they like her. She’s a kindred spirit in quackery 

Did you assume I excluded present company?

[ChiGoose]

2 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

Did you assume I excluded present company?

I don’t know who you were specifically referencing but your point that the board has a lot of quacks is correct and explains why so many of them follow this quack. 

[Pokebball]

4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

I don’t know who you were specifically referencing but your point that the board has a lot of quacks is correct and explains why so many of them follow this quack. 

You don't seem to grasp anywhere near a solid opinion of what quackery is

[ChiGoose]

8 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

You don't seem to grasp anywhere near a solid opinion of what quackery is

If you’re going to make a specific allegation, then do so. I’m not here for games. 
 

But I would say getting legal ”insight” from someone with no experience or background in law is quackery. 

[SoCal Deek]

9 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

If you’re going to make a specific allegation, then do so. I’m not here for games. 
 

But I would say getting legal ”insight” from someone with no experience or background in law is quackery. 

The King doesn’t play games. So shall it be written, so shall it be so. 

[John from Riverside]

3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

The King doesn’t play games. So shall it be written, so shall it be so. 

See it’s post like this that offer. Nothing but an insult that are really not needed.
 

Goose asked for a specific alligation you provided none

[SoCal Deek]

1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:

See it’s post like this that offer. Nothing but an insult that are really not needed.
 

Goose asked for a specific alligation you provided none

You guys have truly lost any sense of humor….if you ever even had one. GET OVER YOURSELVES!  

[Pokebball]

12 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

If you’re going to make a specific allegation, then do so. I’m not here for games. 
 

But I would say getting legal ”insight” from someone with no experience or background in law is quackery. 

Attorneys disagree with each other all the time. That's what they do. This is why we have them. Some legal positions are, what shall I call it, based on "novel legal theory"? That's why higher courts toss cases out.

 

If I were to make an allegation, it would be that some internet legal warriors believe they have a better grasp of the law than do others.

4 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

See it’s post like this that offer. Nothing but an insult that are really not needed.
 

Goose asked for a specific alligation you provided none

We're taking the level of legal debate to a place that probably exceeds a sports message board. I'll always make fun of that. Always

[ChiGoose]

12 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

Attorneys disagree with each other all the time. That's what they do. This is why we have them. Some legal positions are, what shall I call it, based on "novel legal theory"? That's why higher courts toss cases out.

Of course, you know that’s not what’s happening here. Trump’s lawyers told him he was wrong, even the ones who ended up advancing this BS told him it wouldn’t work because it was wrong. 
 

Why do you think the lawyers who pushed this stuff are getting disbarred? You don’t get disbarred for pushing a novel legal theory. 

21 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

The King doesn’t play games. So shall it be written, so shall it be so. 

And those who call him The King are just admitting they can’t read. So I commend you on your dedication to announcing your illiteracy. 

[SoCal Deek]

14 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

Attorneys disagree with each other all the time. That's what they do. This is why we have them. Some legal positions are, what shall I call it, based on "novel legal theory"? That's why higher courts toss cases out.

 

If I were to make an allegation, it would be that some internet legal warriors believe they have a better grasp of the law than do others.

We're taking the level of legal debate to a place that probably exceeds a sports message board. I'll always make fun of that. Always

Hogwash! Goose is always confident that his/her legal opinions are the only ones that count. I’m guessing that attitude makes him/her a very good  counsel for his/her clients. And…it’s also why he/she’s been awarded the title King of the Message Board. (And the fact that he/she doesn’t post any Trump memes.) 

[Pokebball]

5 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

Of course, you know that’s not what’s happening here. Trump’s lawyers told him he was wrong, even the ones who ended up advancing this BS told him it wouldn’t work because it was wrong. 
 

Why do you think the lawyers who pushed this stuff are getting disbarred? You don’t get disbarred for pushing a novel legal theory. 

And those who call him The King are just admitting they can’t read. So I commend you on your dedication to announcing your illiteracy. 

Legal experts have specifically stated that this recent indictment is based on "novel legal theory". That's why I put it in quotes. Heavens!

[BillsFanNC]

 The King @ChiGoose in rare form tonight!

 

Anyway...

 

 

Cue more attacking the messenger by useful idiots....

[John from Riverside]

13 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 The King @ChiGoose in rare form tonight!

 

Anyway...

 

 

Cue more attacking the messenger by useful idiots....

Do you even read the articles that you post?
 

He’s not calling January 6 the cover-up

[ChiGoose]

2 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Do you even read

You can stop there because the answer is no. 
 

He has demonstrated time after time that he’s an idiot who can’t read. 

[BillsFanNC]

10 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 The King @ChiGoose in rare form tonight!

 

Anyway...

 

 

Cue more attacking the messenger by useful idiots....

 

Next thing they'll tell you is that the chief of the Capitol Police isn't an expert on policing the Capitol because The National Pulse is the source of the interview and Tucker Carlson did the interviewing. 

 

Delusional useful idiots living under a green sky.

 

 

In the hour-long interview, Sund laments the behaviors of then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as well as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, who he says had intelligence to suggest problems on Capitol Hill, which they failed to communicate with Sund and his cops on the ground.

 

“If I was allowed to do my job as the chief we wouldn’t be here, this didn’t have to happen,” Sund begins, around 19 minutes into the conversation, during which he describes himself as “pissed off” about being “lambasted in public” over the events.

 

“Everything appears to be a cover up,” says the decorated police chief, explaining that most things to do with his department were political, specifically because he reported to politicians including then Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.

 

“Like I said, I’m not a conspiracy theorist,” Sund explains, “…but when you look at the information and intelligence they had, the military had, it’s all watered down. I’m not getting intelligence, I’m denied any support from National Guard in advance. I’m denied National Guard while we’re under attack, for 71 minutes…”

 

“It sounds like they were hiding the intelligence,” Carlson quizzed, to which Sund stunningly responds: “Could there possibly be actually… they kind of wanted something to happen? It’s not a far stretch to begin to think that. It’s sad when you start putting everything together and thinking about the way this played out… what was their end goal?”

[John from Riverside]

1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Next thing they'll tell you is that the chief of the Capitol Police isn't an expert on policing the Capitol because The National Pulse is the source of the interview and Tucker Carlson did the interviewing. 

 

Delusional useful idiots living under a green sky.

 

 

In the hour-long interview, Sund laments the behaviors of then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as well as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, who he says had intelligence to suggest problems on Capitol Hill, which they failed to communicate with Sund and his cops on the ground.

 

“If I was allowed to do my job as the chief we wouldn’t be here, this didn’t have to happen,” Sund begins, around 19 minutes into the conversation, during which he describes himself as “pissed off” about being “lambasted in public” over the events.

 

“Everything appears to be a cover up,” says the decorated police chief, explaining that most things to do with his department were political, specifically because he reported to politicians including then Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.

 

“Like I said, I’m not a conspiracy theorist,” Sund explains, “…but when you look at the information and intelligence they had, the military had, it’s all watered down. I’m not getting intelligence, I’m denied any support from National Guard in advance. I’m denied National Guard while we’re under attack, for 71 minutes…”

 

“It sounds like they were hiding the intelligence,” Carlson quizzed, to which Sund stunningly responds: “Could there possibly be actually… they kind of wanted something to happen? It’s not a far stretch to begin to think that. It’s sad when you start putting everything together and thinking about the way this played out… what was their end goal?”

Then, maybe the president should’ve called them in what do you think?

[BillsFanNC]

19 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Then, maybe the president should’ve called them in what do you think?

 

How did I know this would be what you'd say.

 

 

This has been gone over many times.

 

The POTUS doesn't have unilateral authority to call up the national guard.

 

He can request the National Guard, but in DC it must be approved by either the house or senate sergeant at arms or the mayor of DC to deploy them.

 

Trump did indeed request the NG for J6, and was denied by both the mayor and the sergeants at arms. 

 

Thanks for playing, but your masters don't program you with these types of inconvenient details.

Edited August 3, 2023 by BillsFanNC

[BillsFanNC]

I love how @ChiGoose is lamenting how others would read and listen to a reporter with no formal legal training..

 

 

Sorry dude...you lost the 'expert' angle during covid where anyone and their brother could be an expert on infectious disease, molecular/immuno diagnostics, epidemiology, vaccines, etc. 

 

You diluted the meaning to the point it no longer has any meaning. Anyone can be an expert now. Just like everything can be racist.

 

Well as long as you have the right political opinion you can be an expert minus whatever academic credentials you wish.

 

This is the bed you and the rest of your band of useful idiots made.

 

Lie in it and enjoy yourself some Julie Kelly.

Edited August 3, 2023 by BillsFanNC

[ChiGoose]

19 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

I love how @ChiGoose is lamenting how others would read and listen to a reporter with no formal legal training..

 

 

Sorry dude...you lost the 'expert' angle during covid where anyone and their brother could be an expert on infectious disease, molecular/immuno diagnostics, epidemiology, vaccines, etc. 

 

You diluted the meaning to the point it no longer has any meaning. Anyone can be an expert now. Just like everything can be racist.

 

Well as long as you have the right political opinion you can be an expert minus whatever academic credentials you wish.

 

This is the bed you and the rest of your band of useful idiots made.

 

Lie in it and enjoy yourself some Julie Kelly.

The rantings of a moron. 

[John from Riverside]

19 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

I love how @ChiGoose is lamenting how others would read and listen to a reporter with no formal legal training..

 

 

Sorry dude...you lost the 'expert' angle during covid where anyone and their brother could be an expert on infectious disease, molecular/immuno diagnostics, epidemiology, vaccines, etc. 

 

You diluted the meaning to the point it no longer has any meaning. Anyone can be an expert now. Just like everything can be racist.

 

Well as long as you have the right political opinion you can be an expert minus whatever academic credentials you wish.

 

This is the bed you and the rest of your band of useful idiots made.

 

Lie in it and enjoy yourself some Julie Kelly.

So education consists of getting online and reading this ***** that confirms your confirmation bias and all of a sudden you’re an expert
 

Got it

[ChiGoose]

1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:

So education consists of getting online and reading this ***** that confirms your confirmation bias and all of a sudden you’re an expert
 

Got it

Don’t argue with an idiot. He’ll bring you down to his level and beat you with experience. 
 

This guy is probably the single dumbest person I’ve ever seen on the internet. Best to just remind everyone that he’s a moron and move on. 

Edited August 3, 2023 by ChiGoose

[BillsFanNC]

10 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

So education consists of getting online and reading this ***** that confirms your confirmation bias and all of a sudden you’re an expert
 

Got it

 

YOUR rules established by leftist covidiots.

 

I'm a molecular biologist with several vaccine formulation and rapid diagnostic patents. Yet I had morons like you, who can't define what a woman is,  telling me what the real deal is with vaccines, immunity and test positives.

 

And confirmation bias ?

 

The projection from you morons should be astounding,  but it's not.

 

Tell me, how is that you still believe, in August of 2023, that Trump didn't request the NG on J6, and his approval for the NG wasn't denied multiple times?

 

 

Edited August 3, 2023 by BillsFanNC

[John from Riverside]

3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

YOUR rules established by leftist covidiots.

 

I'm a molecular biologist with several vaccine formulation and rapid diagnostic patents. Yet I had morons like you, who can't define what a woman is,  telling me what the real deal is with vaccines, immunity and test positives.

 

And confirmation bias ?

 

The projection from you morons should be astounding,  but it's not.

 

Tell me, how is that you still believe, in August of 2023, that Trump didn't request the NG on J6, and his approval for the NG wasn't denied multiple times?

 

 

Wait a minute are you going to say that Donald Trump requested to have the National Guard at the capital for January 6?
 

Is that what you’re going with this is gonna be fun

[BillsFanNC]

25 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Wait a minute are you going to say that Donald Trump requested to have the National Guard at the capital for January 6?
 

Is that what you’re going with this is gonna be fun

 

I go with reality as it exists in the world under a blue sky. I know that you do not.

 

And before you once again attack the messenger news site, the link to the pdf of the J6 timeline memo produced by the Capitol police is in the article. It confirms the Trump DOD was prepared authorize the NG request once it was formally requested, as is required by law. The sergeants at arms and mayor Bowser all rejected DOD efforts to  receive a formal request. It's all there in writing from the very organizations that rejected the NG.

 

Are we having fun yet?

 

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/trump-pentagon-first-offered-national-guard-capitol-four-days-jan-6-riots-memo

 

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

1 hour ago, John from Riverside said:

Wait a minute are you going to say that Donald Trump requested to have the National Guard at the capital for January 6?
 

Is that what you’re going with this is gonna be fun

 

 

Unbelievable.

 

This is well known.

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

Edited August 3, 2023 by B-Man

[John from Riverside]

36 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Unbelievable.

 

This well known.

 

 

 

Based on what?
 

Donald Trump did not move to have National Guard troops at the capital for January 6 that did not happen

 

You really believe that he’s sitting there, losing his ***** because he’s about ready to get kicked out of office and you think that he’s gonna go through the extra step of protecting the institution of voting

 

Come on man