Thoughts on Bengals Game.

[Einstein]

13 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

You're right.  The Bengals can't be come backed on.

 

Well I never said that, so… ok.

 

But yeah the Patriots didn’t lose 2 defensive starters before the end of the 1st quarter either.

 

.

Edited January 3, 2023 by Einstein

[Caesar]

16 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

You're right.  The Bengals can't be come backed on.  Evidence was last week when they were up by 22-0 at halftime, Burrow had just under 300 yards passing in the first half with 3 TD's.  The Bengals have an elite team so the Pats never had a chance in the game.

 

51 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

Yep.  The Bengals scored on all 4 drives in the 1st half against the Pats and were up 22-0.  That spoke volumes as well since the Bengals kept putting up the points on the Pats after half time too.  

 

13 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

Kinda like the same they looked like against the Pats and then did nothingin the 2nd half?  Cincy does a lot of that...they look great for a half but then don't score much the other half.  Hell, even the Bills have done that.  Nothing could really be "figured" out from what we saw to start.

It is obvious you guys did not watch the Patriots game.  Bengals went conservative but still moved the ball with ease, they did have 2 punts but also a missed FG, fumbled, TD called back, 2 interceptions both on the WRs and one in the red zone, Pats had a Hail Mary tipped TD on 3rd & 28 from midfield, Pats had ONE scoring drive the entire game.  Very doubtful the Bengals self implode like that in back to back weeks.  That said, unlike the Pats, the Bills are plenty good enough to come back without the opponent trying to give the game away.  

Edited January 3, 2023 by Caesar

[newcam2012]

27 minutes ago, LondonBill said:

I thought our one drive was pretty good and we looked to have all aspects firing. Their offence looked scary but I think we’d have adapted. Can’t read anything into it, really. I think we might have ground them down. 

Perhaps. May I ask if you think the Bengals D would have adapted and adjusted to the Bills O? Is that a possibility? Lou Anarumo is one of the better at in game adjustment D coordinators in the game. 

 

It cuts both ways here. Can't just say Bills D would have adjusted and tighten up the screws without saying the Bengals might have too. 

[Bill Grundy]

Just now, newcam2012 said:

Perhaps. May I ask if you think the Bengals D would have adapted and adjusted to the Bills O? Is that a possibility? Lou Anarumo is one of the better at in game adjustment D coordinators in the game. 

 

It cuts both ways here. Can't just say Bills D would have adjusted and tighten up the screws without saying the Bengals might have too. 

None of us can say what would have happened. I’m just an optimist maybe. But I’ve seen enough last few years to trust us. But of course it could have gone any way. Just my opinion man 

[Amaru523]

27 minutes ago, teef said:

just look who they are.  does that shock you at all?

That's why I use the names Chicken Little and Ms. Cleo. There's a lot of them on here. 

[Scott7975]

52 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:

Wish we knew what the play call and the responsibilities were on that second down. Seemed more than just the Bengals blew it up.

3rd down incompletion was a bad pass not a drop. A good pass and Cole scores probably untouched. It was a great route and good play design. Josh has to deliver a catchable ball. He did not. Every ball that touches a hand is not a catchable ball and not always a drop. 

 

Personally I think that particular play came in so late that everyone was rushed and they just couldnt execute. That one is on Dorsey IMO. I also disagree.  The ball was catchable.  A tough catch and I dont blame Cole but catchable ball that other receivers do make all the time.

[Royale with Cheese]

1 minute ago, Caesar said:

 

 

It is obvious you guys did not watch the Patriots game.  Bengals went conservative but still moved the ball with ease, they did have 2 punts but also a missed FG, TD called back, 2 interceptions both on the WRs and one in the red zone, Pats had a Hail Mary tipped TD on 3rd & 28 from midfield, Pats had ONE scoring drive the entire game.  Very doubtful the Bengals self implode like that in back to back weeks.  That said, unlike the Pats, the Bills are plenty good enough to come back without the opponent trying to give the game away.  

 

I'm trying to show you that just because someone starts off hot, doesn't mean it will continue.  Whether or not it's self inflicted, it just shows you that to determine that we would have gotten blown out based on a half quarter of action is pretty crazy.  Not saying it's you but there are people who thought the game was over.

 

Yes, we aren't the Pats.  We have a much better offense to keep up with the Bengals.  Burrow throws picks too.

 

They don't have to implode two weeks in a row, we could have gotten hot too.

[newcam2012]

23 minutes ago, Blah Blah said:

The way it looked to me was that the Bengals were going to crush the Bills. Plus they were playing dirty AFC North football. The guy who rolled Allen's ankle, the way Taron Johnson was ground into the turf, the guy who tried to jump over White and kicked him; these were extra physical plays that looked like they were intentionally trying to hurt the smaller, injury-ridden Bills. I don't think you can let a quality home team like the Bengals slice through you at the beginning of the game like you can the Bears or others. The Bengals will not come crashing down to earth with reality like the Bears did in the second half. Burrows was picking apart the Bills D and he made it look easy. 

Sadly, I agree with you. 

 

However, one thing about this team is it's ability to weather the storm and win close games. This team does know how to win.  

 

The Bengals offense would have been difficult to stop with Hamlin and Johnson being out. 

[Draconator]

 

[newcam2012]

26 minutes ago, Einstein said:

It had the feeling of a game that we were about to be blown out in.

 

Obviously things can change quickly but that’s the feeling I had when play stopped.

I didn't get that feeling because I felt like the Bills O would score. 

 

I did feel like the Bills D was going to have major difficulty stopping the Bengals O. 

[Scott7975]

50 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

Very true but at least you can admit the game wasn't an ideal start for the Bills. Especially, playing on the road against an elite team, elite QB, and a dynamic WR core. 

 

Sure no one knows the final outcome but the beginning surely wasn't encouraging. Can we agree on that? 

 

Of course I was not happy with how easy they moved the ball but thats what you get when you play an elite offense.  The Bills would have adjusted.  Cinci would not have scored every drive.  It was always up to our offense to keep pace and our defense to make a few key stops.  Thats how these games will usually go.  Look at our KC playoff game last year.  Its the same for the Bengals. Its up to their offense to keep pace and their defense to make a few key stops. Thats the type of game you get with two super bowl contenders.

Edited January 3, 2023 by Scott7975

[Royale with Cheese]

6 minutes ago, Einstein said:

 

Well I never said that, so… ok.

 

But yeah the Patriots didn’t lose 2 defensive starters before the end of the 1st quarter either.

 

.

 

You're definitely alluding to it lol.  "Context" after 8 offensive plays.

 

So that's the difference?  Pats didn't lose two starters and that's why they could come back?

 

The Pats came back with only scoring one offensive TD.  Are we not built to come back?

[Caesar]

4 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

I'm trying to show you that just because someone starts off hot, doesn't mean it will continue.  Whether or not it's self inflicted, it just shows you that to determine that we would have gotten blown out based on a half quarter of action is pretty crazy.  Not saying it's you but there are people who thought the game was over.

 

Yes, we aren't the Pats.  We have a much better offense to keep up with the Bengals.  Burrow throws picks too.

 

They don't have to implode two weeks in a row, we could have gotten hot too.

I dont disagree, as perhaps you missed my last sentence... "That said, unlike the Pats, the Bills are plenty good enough to come back without the opponent trying to give the game away."

[SCBills]

8 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

Perhaps. May I ask if you think the Bengals D would have adapted and adjusted to the Bills O? Is that a possibility? Lou Anarumo is one of the better at in game adjustment D coordinators in the game. 

 

It cuts both ways here. Can't just say Bills D would have adjusted and tighten up the screws without saying the Bengals might have too. 

 

My pushback would be that the Bills season-long data would tell you they adjust.   For better or worse.. that's the Bills Defense this year. 

[Einstein]

Just now, Royale with Cheese said:

 

You're definitely alluding to it lol.  "Context" after 8 offensive plays.

 

So that's the difference?  Pats didn't lose two starters and that's why they could come back?

 

The Pats came back with only scoring one offensive TD.  Are we not built to come back?

 

Well that’s a pretty big deal. Losing 2 of 12 defensive starters (when you’re already down 1, so really 3 defensive starters out) is a huge deal against a top tier defense.

 

Comparing that to a healthy Pats defense with one of the greeters defensive coaches in history is odd to me.

[Royale with Cheese]

1 minute ago, Caesar said:

I dont disagree, as perhaps you missed my last sentence... "That said, unlike the Pats, the Bills are plenty good enough to come back without the opponent trying to give the game away."

 

No I read that and I agree.  That's why its crazy to me to think that people thought this game was already heading to a blow out.

It might have, it might not have.  It's why you play 60 minutes.

[GoBills808]

Just now, Royale with Cheese said:

 

No I read that and I agree.  That's why its crazy to me to think that people thought this game was already heading to a blow out.

It might have, it might not have.  It's why you play 60 minutes.

It wasn't going to be a blowout lol

 

when's the last time the Bills got blown out

[Caesar]

1 minute ago, SCBills said:

 

My pushback would be that the Bills season-long data would tell you they adjust.   For better or worse.. that's the Bills Defense this year. 

I don't disagree with this comment, that said the Bengals DC is perhaps the best in the league with halftime adjustments - thus at the least there would had been some offset.

[BuffaloRebound]

The only thing I took from the first 10 minutes of the game is that the Bengals had a plan to go right at Tre White, and were so confident in that plan succeeding that they elected to receive the opening kickoff.  

[quincy]

The Bengals really wanted to show the prime time audience who they are.

 

Building up to the game you see the words by Mixon, they seemed to feel disrespected as being team #3 in the AFC mix despite being the reigning AFC Champs. 

 

It was a very physical game - Taron injury and evaluation, Josh being rolled up on and then obviously Damar's serious injury.

 

As a fan I am very glad McDermott is our coach, as a human and leader. Remember the Dolphins coaches lip service thoughts on Tua? 

 

My thoughts are that we can't fully evaluate this game with less that 10 minutes played in the first quarter - I just wish the Buffalo Bills players and staff are allowed to recover and process what happened as necessary and I am a very proud fan of the Buffalo Bills.