Jump to content

What’s the Coverage? Who’s to blame? Waddle TD


EmotionallyUnstable

Recommended Posts

I don't know the specifics of DB coverage as well as some others, but this thread verifies what my eyes were telling me all game. The safeties felt out of position the whole game.

 

This game may end up being a useful coaching tool to clean up those calls and coverages for the game against Cincy who will deploy three capable WR most of the game.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Richard Noggin said:

Great thread. I'll bet there is outside analysis (Cover-1?) on this particular play that could add a perspective, but not sure I have the focus at this hour to find it.

There is 0 identifiable coverage 

 

it’s obviously miscommunication but probably a combination coverage 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

There is 0 identifiable coverage 

 

it’s obviously miscommunication but probably a combination coverage 

Agreed. It kind of HAS to be related to the pre-snap communication between Edmunds and Poyer, yes? Or if not, then it's just a blatant blown assignment by a guy who tends not to blow assignments. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Richard Noggin said:

Agreed. It kind of HAS to be related to the pre-snap communication between Edmunds and Poyer, yes? Or if not, then it's just a blatant blown assignment by a guy who tends not to blow assignments. 

Like most calls, In our complicated coverage scheme… There are checks that get dictated by the offenses formation or personnel 

 

And they adjust based on the look given

 

It’s Not just The trips right that Would definitely signal a check to me… Trips right plus waddle inside 100% check to adjust 

 

but with all the factors it’s impossible to know what they checked too because it’s definitely a combination of things … and I think the roles were lost in communication 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This exact same play was the reason we lost the 1st game to Miami.  Deep cross wide open Waddle.

 

I was at the Florida game and remember saying theres no way Poyer/Hyde wouldve blown that coverage, then the exact same play hits us again at home w Poyer on the field.  He also took a crappy angle on the Dalvin Cook long TD which he never does.

 

Funny he gets pro bowl in a season with some major errors, and in the past hes played very long stretches of flawless ball and doesnt get the nod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


 

I am not going to assign blame - I think the Dolphins just had a perfect route combo against a defense and made the play.

 

My guess is if you talked to the players - Poyer would blame himself for coming to far down and not getting back and Hamlin would blame his positioning and his angle, but sometimes the offense wins.

 

It looked like a trick combo coverage - they show a standard 2 high shell, but on the snap rotate to a 1 high safety, but it looks like the intention was for Hamlin to maintain his deep half over the trips side.

 

I think the Bills developed the defense for a formation like that expecting the Dolphins to run a shorter crossing route with Waddle or Hill right into Poyer and Hamlin over the top in case the other Hill or Waddle went deep,

 

In this case, the Dolphins ran Waddle on the deep over and Hill deep at Hamlin and with Poyer rotating up it left the huge gap that Hamlin could not cover.

 

I believe Tremaine (or Tremont if you want to use the name Mark uses) - recognized the spacing and communicated with Poyer and Poyer got over anxious and overplayed his hand and it left the massive hole.  
 

To me it looked like the Bills created a defensive scheme to counter something the Dolphins have done and the Dolphins countered with different patterns and it burned the Bills - no blame - just something that happens from time to time.

 

 

Edited by Rochesterfan
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Motorin' said:

 

Every time I've seen the replay of the Tyreek TD where Hamlin was too late, I  couldn't help but think Micah would have picked that rainbow off just like he did against McCorkle in the playoffs. 

same thought here- Micah makes them pay

2 hours ago, babulator said:

The only thing for certain is Tremaine saw the lapse and tried to communicate it.

 

Just thought I'd throw that out there +1 Maine 

i was screaming TIME OUT TIME OUT TIME OUT when i saw Tremaine gesturing but the Ref didn't hear me 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is defintely zone not man coverage. To me its either Cover 3 with a Robber safety dropping in the hole and Hamlin has to rotate or its Cover 6 and Poyer messes up. If its Cover 6, the Cover 4 is to the field and the Cover 2 is to the boundary which means that Poyer screwed it up. 

 

I believe its Cover 6 because Jackson on the left turns and starts slide stepping reading the QB and his eyes. Hamlin backpedals in a straight fashion and doesn't look like he rotates in the slightest. Milano has the flat on the other side while you see Tre White getting to the deep quarter. I think Poyer got sucked up when he has the deep quarter.

Edited by gonzo1105
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Da webster guy said:

This exact same play was the reason we lost the 1st game to Miami.  Deep cross wide open Waddle.

 

I was at the Florida game and remember saying theres no way Poyer/Hyde wouldve blown that coverage, then the exact same play hits us again at home w Poyer on the field.  He also took a crappy angle on the Dalvin Cook long TD which he never does.

 

Funny he gets pro bowl in a season with some major errors, and in the past hes played very long stretches of flawless ball and doesnt get the nod.

Poyer didn’t play in the Minnesota game. Do we forget Cam Lewis so easily?

11 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yea communication breakdown rather than someone blowing an assignment I think. I agree they were in a cover 1 look some seemed based on the checks to come out of that and others stayed. 

 

It is an example of why Micah and Jordan as a pair are greater than the sum of their parts because in 5 years together they have probably had fewer communication breakdowns than we have had in a single season with that pairing broken up. 

I think it is more a case of Miami’s ability to run at will finally brought Poyer up to check that, and Miami had the perfect answer. If the Bills had been more effective at stopping the run, these things don’t happen. Good play call by McDaniel, who is a smart offensive mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Da webster guy said:

This exact same play was the reason we lost the 1st game to Miami.  Deep cross wide open Waddle.

 

I was at the Florida game and remember saying theres no way Poyer/Hyde wouldve blown that coverage, then the exact same play hits us again at home w Poyer on the field.  He also took a crappy angle on the Dalvin Cook long TD which he never does.

 

Funny he gets pro bowl in a season with some major errors, and in the past hes played very long stretches of flawless ball and doesnt get the nod.

 

Poyer didn't play against minnesota, and edmunds was out at that point in the game.  Hamlin made his run fit, i think benford missed the tackle? and dodson had a terrible pursuit angle.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

So I know this is hard to fathom, but sometimes really good players make plays it whenever they play on other teams
 

for some it’s like they don’t even bother to watch other games. All they do is watch the bills and have their mind wrapped around the way that they should be perfect.

 

I think some people, especially people like myself, who have been in the game a long time as a player(HS,College), a coach(HS), and a Recruiter(College), like to look at things more analytically than the typical fan. 

 

I am not knocking you or anyone else that just watches the game and enjoys it without looking at coverages and what happened wrong etc its just its different when you have been in the game for a long time. 

 

I go to games and I'm not drunk, I don't scream my head off when the Bills are on defense, I'm intently watching what we are doing as a team and what the other team is doing as a team moreso than anything. Of course I cheer if they make a big play or score and hi five but I feel like the average Bills fan thinks i'm weird in the stands with my arms crossed just watching. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gonzo1105 said:

 

I think some people, especially people like myself, who have been in the game a long time as a player(HS,College), a coach(HS), and a Recruiter(College), like to look at things more analytically than the typical fan. 

 

I am not knocking you or anyone else that just watches the game and enjoys it without looking at coverages and what happened wrong etc its just its different when you have been in the game for a long time. 

 

I go to games and I'm not drunk, I don't scream my head off when the Bills are on defense, I'm intently watching what we are doing as a team and what the other team is doing as a team moreso than anything. Of course I cheer if they make a big play or score and hi five but I feel like the average Bills fan thinks i'm weird in the stands with my arms crossed just watching. 

My point is, you can take a breakdown in defensive coverage that happens in a bills game and you could turn around and you could watch other teams and they will have the exact same breakdowns more of them even given the defensive ranking of the bills
 

I’m not saying don’t criticize if somebody ***** up they ***** up, but I just wish people would understand that it’s not a bills thing when waddle and he’ll have been terrorizing the fences all year

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gonzo1105 said:

It is defintely zone not man coverage. To me its either Cover 3 with a Robber safety dropping in the hole and Hamlin has to rotate or its Cover 6 and Poyer messes up. If its Cover 6, the Cover 4 is to the field and the Cover 2 is to the boundary which means that Poyer screwed it up. 

 

I believe its Cover 6 because Jackson on the left turns and starts slide stepping reading the QB and his eyes. Hamlin backpedals in a straight fashion and doesn't look like he rotates in the slightest. Milano has the flat on the other side while you see Tre White getting to the deep quarter. I think Poyer got sucked up when he has the deep quarter.

That would be the worst cover six by an all pro ever… He has Half field responsibilities in that

 

It’s almost impossible for a player that caliber to lose track of his Assignment that bad… I’m supposed to have Half field responsibility but I’m gonna sink in and play robber and ignore the call?

 

Also in cover six in the nickel.. On the cover 2 side … You would expect the corner to have the flat… and Milano hook to Seam or curl

 

McDermotts defense is so complex… Rarely is it a straight up look… There are checks and principles to every offensive formation and personnel Including when trips line up

 

When trips lineup… And they’re typically in a cover three look… Whether it’s disguised or not… That would instantly call for a check to a matching principal so they don’t get beat vertically 

 

that could be the miscommunication 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Buffalo716
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

That would be the worst cover six by an all pro ever… He has Half field responsibilities in that

 

It’s almost impossible for a player that caliber to lose track of his Assignment that bad… I’m supposed to have Half field responsibility but I’m gonna sink in and play robber and ignore the call?

 

Also in cover six in the nickel.. On the cover 2 side … You would expect the corner to have the flat… and Milano hook to Seam or curl

 

McDermotts defense is so complex… Rarely is it a straight up look… There are checks and principles to every offensive formation and personnel Including when trips line up

 

When trips lineup… And they’re typically in a cover three look… Whether it’s disguised or not… That would instantly call for a check to a matching principal so they don’t get beat vertically 

 

that could be the miscommunication 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So after rewatching it it still look like cover 6 Jackson goes to the flat, Milano does go hook to seam(I got him and Johnson mixed up), Poyer drops in the hole, Hamlin straight backpedals trying to get depth, White is in the Deep Quarter and Johnson chucks and goes to the flat. Seems like some variation of Cover 6 with a Robber Safety. Now maybe its a Cover 6 disguise with a 3 Robber look, I think that is very plausible as well. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:

 

So after rewatching it it still look like cover 6 Jackson goes to the flat, Milano does go hook to seam(I got him and Johnson mixed up), Poyer drops in the hole, Hamlin straight backpedals trying to get depth, White is in the Deep Quarter and Johnson chucks and goes to the flat. Seems like some variation of Cover 6 with a Robber Safety. Now maybe its a Cover 6 disguise with a 3 Robber look, I think that is very plausible as well. 

It could be a cover 6 with a Robber concept expecting a quick hitter up the middle 

 

That does leave the entire deep left half open tho … trips definitely made the secondary make a check at the LoS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...