BillStime Posted July 31, 2023 Author Share Posted July 31, 2023 12 hours ago, B-Man said: But you don't understand, THERE ARE TAPES ! and it’s the greatest security risk in US history !! But Lock Her Up, right Bonnie? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted July 31, 2023 Share Posted July 31, 2023 1 minute ago, BillStime said: But Lock Her Up, right Bonnie? He'll come back with a cartoon, or some gibberish about fake news, or some conspiracy theory in which aliens eating peanut butter were allowed into the state department by Hillary while she was confessing to the murder of Vince Foster. But none of that will happen until he gets done arguing that Jesus was not a brown migrant, and in fact took a white-skinned, blue-eyed, perhaps blond-haired form and supported the prosperity Gospel. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted July 31, 2023 Share Posted July 31, 2023 16 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. I didn't mention obesity, drunkenness, or racism. Although, now that you mention it, I probably should have reminded everyone that many MAGA are slobs soused in liquor. Thank you for the reminder! C3: "Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?" Bills Fan NC: "He's on a roll." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted July 31, 2023 Share Posted July 31, 2023 1 hour ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. I didn't mention obesity, drunkenness, or racism. Although, now that you mention it, I probably should have reminded everyone that many MAGA are slobs soused in liquor. Thank you for the reminder! Also, you didn't mention anything about "Lock Her Up!" Your concern with respect to the rabidity relative to which one partisan group seems intent upon incarcerating a member or members of a partisan group with opposing views seems misplaced. Unless, of course, you believe that Hillary Clinton should have been incarcerated without due process. Section….You can’t possibly not recognize the movie reference. Or can you? Maybe my age is showing. 😉 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 31, 2023 Share Posted July 31, 2023 Wow...a lot of quoting of hoaxster @SectionC3. The dude has gone full @BillStime. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDHillFan Posted July 31, 2023 Share Posted July 31, 2023 1 hour ago, SectionC3 said: He'll come back with a cartoon, or some gibberish about fake news, or some conspiracy theory in which aliens eating peanut butter were allowed into the state department by Hillary while she was confessing to the murder of Vince Foster. But none of that will happen until he gets done arguing that Jesus was not a brown migrant, and in fact took a white-skinned, blue-eyed, perhaps blond-haired form and supported the prosperity Gospel. I would compliment you on being clever, edgy, and witty but that would be a hoax. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted July 31, 2023 Share Posted July 31, 2023 6 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Wow...a lot of quoting of hoaxster @SectionC3. The dude has gone full @BillStime. But Section doesn’t even know that the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor! 😉 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 31, 2023 Share Posted July 31, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, SectionC3 said: Also, you didn't mention anything about "Lock Her Up!" Your concern with respect to the rabidity relative to which one partisan group seems intent upon incarcerating a member or members of a partisan group with opposing views seems misplaced. Unless, of course, you believe that Hillary Clinton should have been incarcerated without due process. Generally, few object to applying due process to Hillary. However, there's an understanding that she's exempt from due process since the Washington insiders cult, where party affiliation is not a requirement for membership, protects her from consequences. Legal and other types of consequences. Consequences from what you might ask? Well, disregarding Department of State rules for e-mail and document handling, which exposed confidential and secret government documents to hackers through the use of an unauthorized, and hence illegal e-mail server set up, destroying evidence covered under a court order to preserve evidence, evidence in the form of electronic records and physical devices. None of which were charged or pursued. The thought behind her use of the home server is doing so protected her correspondence from freedom of information inquires which might cover DOS servers and records. How much worse were Trump's transgressions considering the unique rules of Presidential authority? In his case its unclear to unknowable that foreign enemies got hold of anything while we know Hillary's servers were hacked and its almost certain Chinese and Russian intelligence got hold of classified information because of her negligence, willful negligence I would emphasize. Add to it the shady dealings of the Clinton Foundation, which suddenly saw a flood of donations from foreign actors drop to a trickle when Bill and Hillary were both out of official government positions and you've got the model for the payoff operation the Biden's are running. The difference being the Clinton's were a lot smarter about it along with not having a drug addicted child fronting for the family business. So call it a "hoax". That's your thing. All that proves is you're blind to reality. Edited July 31, 2023 by All_Pro_Bills 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted July 31, 2023 Share Posted July 31, 2023 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: Section….You can’t possibly not recognize the movie reference. Or can you? Maybe my age is showing. 😉 I honestly have no idea what you were talking about. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted July 31, 2023 Share Posted July 31, 2023 5 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: I honestly have no idea what you were talking about. No worries. Google it. 👍 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted August 1, 2023 Author Share Posted August 1, 2023 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted August 1, 2023 Share Posted August 1, 2023 51 minutes ago, BillStime said: Yes, everyone knows that storing them in your garage is a far better system! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 1, 2023 Share Posted August 1, 2023 10 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: Yes, everyone knows that storing them in your garage is a far better system! But, but, but, he didn't know they were there. He's blind. And senile. And dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 12 hours ago, BillStime said: There's absolutely zero evidence any document in Trump's possession was disclosed to anyone which resulted in a national security exposure. But various clowns here still claim he sold secrets. Idiots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted August 2, 2023 Author Share Posted August 2, 2023 41 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: There's absolutely zero evidence any document in Trump's possession was disclosed to anyone which resulted in a national security exposure. But various clowns here still claim he sold secrets. Idiots. Do you want to rethink this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 20 hours ago, BillStime said: No one seems to be mentioning it, but there is literally a copier right in the room 7 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: There's absolutely zero evidence any document in Trump's possession was disclosed to anyone which resulted in a national security exposure. But various clowns here still claim he sold secrets. Idiots. You’re absolutely missing the point on this I don’t believe in conspiracy theories, so I’m not gonna sit here and say that Donald Trump sold secrets However The sheer fact that he had those documents in an unsecured area, and then refused to give them back, is more than enough to convict him You’ve got to understand he’s already been given special treatment. If anybody else would have done this, they would already be in jail without bond. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted August 31, 2023 Share Posted August 31, 2023 On 6/28/2023 at 10:42 AM, John from Riverside said: Does it bother you at all that Trump is obviously guilty of what they are accusing him of and you’re trying to use technicalities to defend him? That tape audio could not have been any more damning Bump for JFR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted September 1, 2023 Share Posted September 1, 2023 6 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Bump for JFR. OK you’re getting kind of creepy I’m only into women sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted September 1, 2023 Share Posted September 1, 2023 Lack of evidence doesn't equate to a crime. In fact. That's the due process the courts have to prove didn't exist 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted September 6, 2023 Author Share Posted September 6, 2023 Of course Conald was warned but the man child decided FAFO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts