SectionC3 Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 10 hours ago, Doc Brown said: I don't give a *****. Some people are born with silver spoon in hand and that's the way it's always been. I'm genuinely curious if a sitting president can pardon himself. Undetermined, but probably not, based upon the theory that no man can act as his own judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 11 hours ago, B-Man said: They've got him this next time! "They've got tapes "!!! Trending @BrianCates Fact 1: this audio recording was made in Bedminster, NJ. It was not made in Mar-A-Lago, FL Fact 2: Nowhere in the indictment does Special Counsel Jack Smith discuss classified documents at Trump's Bedminster, NJ resort Fact 3: This was never going to be Trump's word vs. whoever made the recording. Trump had multiple staff in the room at the time this meeting occurred. Does it bother you at all that Trump is obviously guilty of what they are accusing him of and you’re trying to use technicalities to defend him? That tape audio could not have been any more damning 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 26 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: That tape audio could not have been any more damning True. It is the perfect gift to a prosecutor. It is so incredibly stupid of Trump to do this - at the time he had already been notified that the National Archives was demanding return of presidential records, and yet there he is, being recorded (by a journalist who almost certainly asked him "ok if we record this"), saying that he is knowingly retaining classified records. If he weren't running for President, his best defense would be that he's now so mentally compromised that he lacked the ability to understand what he was doing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 11 hours ago, B-Man said: It’s likely included as an exception to rule 404(b) as evidence of intent and/or knowledge. If that document was to be charged for itself, it’d likely have to happen in New Jersey. I’m not sure who this Julie Kelly is that you all love citing but she seems bad at her job. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 16 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: It’s likely included as an exception to rule 404(b) as evidence of intent and/or knowledge. If that document was to be charged for itself, it’d likely have to happen in New Jersey. I’m not sure who this Julie Kelly is that you all love citing but she seems bad at her job. And yes, it would need to be charged in New Jersey. Which raises the possibility of another prosecution in the District of New Jersey, I suppose. And yes, this Julie Kelly is the dumb conspiracist's idea of a smart person. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 6 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: And yes, it would need to be charged in New Jersey. Which raises the possibility of another prosecution in the District of New Jersey, I suppose. And yes, this Julie Kelly is the dumb conspiracist's idea of a smart person. I believe there is a grand jury open in NJ but no idea if they plan to charge this particular document. It seems that they are only charging the documents Trump kept after he told the government he had given them all back. Not sure if this doc was part of the ones voluntarily turned over. If it was, they probably won’t charge it and just use it for evidence of intent and knowledge instead. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 IT WAS ALL A LIE: Jack Smith Leaked Trump Milley Audio to Fake News to Taint Jury Pool and Smear Trump – But It IS NOT Part of Bogus Indictments Against President Trump For weeks Special Counsel Jack Smith has been leaking allegations to the lemming media on alleged ‘classified’ information on a report discussed by President Trump to his associates and written by dummy Mark Milley, who surrendered Afghanistan to the Taliban and turned over $80 billion in US weapons to the terrorist group. Milley wrote a report on his invasion plans into Iran that included the deployment of a “massive number of troops” into the Islamic State. This was obviously not taken seriously by President Trump or his staff. Trump was the first US president in decades to keep the US out of any new wars. This recent leak by dirty Special Counsel Jack Smith involved Mark Milley and some nonsense he wrote about invading Iran. Quote I'm beginning to read the indictment against Trump. But even three pages in, it's clear that the leaks that preceded the indictment are far too close to what is actually being pleaded by DOJ to be a coincidence. For example, in paragraph 6a on page 3, we hear about the recording… pic.twitter.com/HP7YErumRf https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/06/it-was-all-lie-dirty-jack-smith-leaked/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=it-was-all-lie-dirty-jack-smith-leaked https://www.cbsnews.com/news/iran-memo-not-among-the-31-records-underlying-charges-in-trump-federal-indictment/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 25 minutes ago, B-Man said: IT WAS ALL A LIE: Jack Smith Leaked Trump Milley Audio to Fake News to Taint Jury Pool and Smear Trump – But It IS NOT Part of Bogus Indictments Against President Trump For weeks Special Counsel Jack Smith has been leaking allegations to the lemming media on alleged ‘classified’ information on a report discussed by President Trump to his associates and written by dummy Mark Milley, who surrendered Afghanistan to the Taliban and turned over $80 billion in US weapons to the terrorist group. Milley wrote a report on his invasion plans into Iran that included the deployment of a “massive number of troops” into the Islamic State. This was obviously not taken seriously by President Trump or his staff. Trump was the first US president in decades to keep the US out of any new wars. This recent leak by dirty Special Counsel Jack Smith involved Mark Milley and some nonsense he wrote about invading Iran. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/06/it-was-all-lie-dirty-jack-smith-leaked/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=it-was-all-lie-dirty-jack-smith-leaked https://www.cbsnews.com/news/iran-memo-not-among-the-31-records-underlying-charges-in-trump-federal-indictment/ its providing the hope and conspiracy they need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 28 minutes ago, B-Man said: IT WAS ALL A LIE: Jack Smith Leaked Trump Milley Audio to Fake News to Taint Jury Pool and Smear Trump – But It IS NOT Part of Bogus Indictments Against President Trump For weeks Special Counsel Jack Smith has been leaking allegations to the lemming media on alleged ‘classified’ information on a report discussed by President Trump to his associates and written by dummy Mark Milley, who surrendered Afghanistan to the Taliban and turned over $80 billion in US weapons to the terrorist group. Milley wrote a report on his invasion plans into Iran that included the deployment of a “massive number of troops” into the Islamic State. This was obviously not taken seriously by President Trump or his staff. Trump was the first US president in decades to keep the US out of any new wars. This recent leak by dirty Special Counsel Jack Smith involved Mark Milley and some nonsense he wrote about invading Iran. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/06/it-was-all-lie-dirty-jack-smith-leaked/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=it-was-all-lie-dirty-jack-smith-leaked https://www.cbsnews.com/news/iran-memo-not-among-the-31-records-underlying-charges-in-trump-federal-indictment/ I don’t understand your insistence on being loudly and proudly wrong when it’s already been explained to you. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 7 minutes ago, Chris farley said: its providing the hope and conspiracy they need. Why would Jack Smith do that? He knows its a violation of law to leak evidence of an ongoing investigation. And being a special counsel it crosses the line of ethics and duty required for that job. If he knows there's sufficient evidence to hang Trump out to dry why bother? If you assume the main objective is to bring Trump to justice, find him guilty, and sentence him to some punishment it makes little sense. But if you believe the main objective is to discredit Trump as much as possible by carpet bombing the new cycles with negative stories about his actions and activities in an attempt at character assassination to convince enough Trump "supporters" to abandon him and support somebody else then it makes all then sense in the world. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Why would Jack Smith do that? He knows its a violation of law to leak evidence of an ongoing investigation. And being a special counsel it crosses the line of ethics and duty required for that job. If he knows there's sufficient evidence to hang Trump out to dry why bother? If you assume the main objective is to bring Trump to justice, find him guilty, and sentence him to some punishment it makes little sense. But if you believe the main objective is to discredit Trump as much as possible by carpet bombing the new cycles with negative stories about his actions and activities in an attempt at character assassination to convince enough Trump "supporters" to abandon him and support somebody else then it makes all then sense in the world. Im going with the second option. based on the prior actions of the DOJ/DEMS. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 1 minute ago, Chris farley said: Im going with the second option. based on the prior actions of the DOJ/DEMS. As I said on another thread in the world of politics the truth and facts don't matter. All you need to do is tell a convincing enough story that people will believe. The Democrats have mastered that art to perfection. And it doesn't hurt that they have the censorship system in place to silence anyone that provides any rebuttal. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said: As I said on another thread in the world of politics the truth and facts don't matter. All you need to do is tell a convincing enough story that people will believe. The Democrats have mastered that art to perfection. And it doesn't hurt that they have the censorship system in place to silence anyone that provides any rebuttal. Right above your post are fine examples. parroting what they were told on MSNBC while promoting the next conspiracy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 11 minutes ago, Chris farley said: Right above your post are fine examples. parroting what they were told on MSNBC while promoting the next conspiracy. The level of projection here is unreal. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 1 minute ago, ChiGoose said: The level of projection here is unreal. the example replies. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted June 28, 2023 Author Share Posted June 28, 2023 The psyops continue 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 53 minutes ago, Chris farley said: the example replies. I’m sorry even basic concepts confuse you. That must be rough. PS: If you were actually talking about me, it just further proves you’re just making stuff up because you don’t understand reality. I don’t watch MSNBC. Or CNN. Or any tv news for that matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 Just now, ChiGoose said: I’m sorry even basic concepts confuse you. That must be rough. PS: If you were actually talking about me, it just further proves you’re just making stuff up because you don’t understand reality. I don’t watch MSNBC. Or CNN. Or any tv news for that matter. That’s why you’re The King! 😁 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 28, 2023 Share Posted June 28, 2023 17 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: That’s why you’re The King! 😁 Explaining reality to people whose brains have rotted out sometimes involves them attacking you. But at the end of the day, they’re still the ones spending all of their time in an online circlejerk of conspiracies because nobody wants to talk to them in the real world. Enjoy whatever joy being a troll online gets you. Sorry if your home life sucks. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts