Jump to content

POLICE STATE BIDEN TRIALS: Corrupt DOJ/FBI/GA DA/CO SC/ME SoS: Trump Indicted 4x.


Recommended Posts

The most relevant is that a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and solely his, as is his ability to declassify or destroy records at will.

 

Under the statutory scheme established by the PRA, the decision to segregate personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President's term and in his sole discretion," Jackson wrote in her March 2012 decision, which was never appealed.

"Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records," she added.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, nedboy7 said:

 

B-Man!  You the prototypical dunce.  Wasting your life on this site.  LOL. 

Personally, I can see how the whole mistake was made.  I think Marshall Law was a low budget, B movie in the 1970s about a crooked cop who went straight after being assaulted and left for dead by a notorious mob boss named Hugh G. Rection.  Martial law involves the usurpation of civil law in favor of military authority during times of societal unrest.  Simple mistake, and don't even get me started on Marshall Crenshaw.  Someday, some way maybe I'll understand that. 

 

That said, it was an unforced error on your part.  Now you're doubling down by mocking someone for being on a site you're quite active on, except of course when dodging questions about your deeply held political beliefs that you apply on a completely arbitrary basis.  You should take the hit, tap out, and try again.  Do the right thing. 

 

For what it's worth, I value @B-Man's  prototypical duncery, or duncessness if you will.  I think his dunceocity is off the charts!

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Shared hotel rooms. Fake militias. Booze and pot. Planted evidence. Phony bomb makers. Criminal FBI informants. Wife-beating wife-swappers.

 

No, that’s not the latest iteration of the “X Files” but the real-life drama of the FBI-concocted scheme to “kidnap” Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in 2020

Edited by DRsGhost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • BillsFanNC changed the title to Rogue Agency: FBI & DOJ Corruption: Regime Gestapo/FBI Raids 45th POTUS Private Residence

VDH - another brilliant piece:

 

 

 

...When we do hear of an insurrectionary plan—to kidnap the Michigan governor—we discover a concocted mess. Twelve FBI informants outnumbered the supposed four “conspirators.” And two of them were acquitted by a jury and the other two so far found not guilty due to a mistrial.

 

The buffoonish January 6 riot at the Capitol is often cited as proof of the insurrectionary right-wing movement. But the one-day riotous embarrassment never turned up any armed revolutionaries or plots to overthrow the government.

 

What it did do was give the Left an excuse to weaponize the nation’s capital with barbed wire and thousands of federal troops, in the greatest militarization of Washington D.C. since the Civil War.

 

In contrast, Antifa and BLM rioters were no one-day buffoons. They systematically organized a series of destructive and deadly riots across the country for over four months in summer 2020. The lethal toll of their work was over 35 dead, $2 billion in property losses, and hundreds of police officers injured. 

 

Such violent protestors torched the ironic St. John’s Episcopal church and attempted to fight their way into the White House grounds. Their violent agenda prompted the Secret Service to evacuate the president of the United States to a secure bunker. 

 

The New York Times gleefully applauded the rioting near the White House grounds with the snarky headline “Trump Shrinks Back.”  

 

 

....Time essayist Molly Ball in early 2021 gushed about a brilliant “conspiracy” of wealthy tech lords, Democratic Party activists, and Biden operators. 

 

Ball bragged how they had systematically poured hundreds of millions of dark money into changing voting laws, and absorbing the role of government registrars in key precincts.

 

What was revolutionary were new progressive precedents of impeaching a president twice, trying him as a private citizen, barring minority congressional representatives from House committee memberships, and tearing up the state of the union address on national television.

 

In contrast, decrying the weaponization of a once-professional FBI, and the scandals among its wayward Washington hierarchy is not insurrectionary. Nor is being appalled at the FBI raiding a former president’s and possible presidential candidate’s home, when historically disputes over presidential papers were the business of lawyers not armed agents.... 

 

https://amgreatness.com/2022/08/17/civil-war-porn/

 

Edited by Big Blitz
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Shared hotel rooms. Fake militias. Booze and pot. Planted evidence. Phony bomb makers. Criminal FBI informants. Wife-beating wife-swappers.

 

No, that’s not the latest iteration of the “X Files” but the real-life drama of the FBI-concocted scheme to “kidnap” Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in 2020


Did Jules instruct you to edit the title of the thread?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/reinhart-formally-rejects-doj-argument-to-keep-trump-affidavit-sealed-calls-raid-unprecedented

 

Judge Bruce Reinhart on Monday admitted the FBI's raid on former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago home was "unprecedented," and formally rejected the Justice Department's argument to keep the affidavit leading to the search under seal, citing the "intense public and historical interest."

Reinhart, in a filing Monday morning, said he rejects "the Government’s argument that the present record justifies keeping the entire Affidavit under seal." 

"The Government argues that even requiring it to redact portions of the Affidavit that could not reveal agent identities or investigative sources and methods imposes an undue burden on its resources and sets a precedent that could be disruptive and burdensome in future cases," Reinhart wrote. "I do not need to reach the question of whether, in some other case, these concerns could justify denying public access; they very well might." 

 

Good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/21/2022 at 12:26 PM, BillStime said:


Keep ‘em coming 

 

lolz

He should get a job.  He has a lot of people to repay.  And I don’t want him eating free cheese or using Medicaid on my dime.  Then again, taking from the government while complaining about the government is such a MAGA thing to do. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All whistleblowers must be protected and believed.  Remember?

 

 

FBI field offices in Miami, Salt Lake City, Buffalo and Newark face accusations that their upper management coerced agents to sign false affidavits, inflated terrorism caseloads to improve their apparent performance, engaged in illicit sexual activities, or concealed those of others, according to the Washington Times.

 

“The FBI is completely out of control and its culture and structure needs to change. Not only is the political bias completely out of control and disgustingly obvious, the FBI knows they will not be held accountable for their illegal behavior and misconduct,” said one Whistleblower in a letter to Rep. Louis Gohmert (R-Tx) of the House Judiciary Committee. This whistleblower alleged that FBI Director Christopher Wray ignored her allegations of sexual misconduct.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Maybe just maybe if Hillary didn't have an unauthorized server in her home and Hunter didn't cash in on his dad's name to enrich his family, then the FBI wouldn't have to worry about how their invesgations might impact elections.

 

Corrupt to the core.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Doc said:

 

Sure.  They were likely working together.


They sure were

 

What’s Facebook’s Deal With Donald Trump?

 

Zuckerberg once wanted to sanction Trump. Then Facebook wrote rules that accommodated him.

 

Peter Thiel Claimed Zuckerberg Agreed to Push ‘State-Sanctioned Conservatism’ Under Trump Deal

 

Zuckerberg’s secret deal with Trump administration Is it the reason Facebook avoided heavy regulation?

 

The cult doesn’t mind when the FBI, DOJ and BIG TECH (lmao) sides w Donald but as soon as Donald goes too far (cuz he always does) - those entities reverse course and the cult goes nuts.

 

idiots 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BillStime said:


They sure were

 

What’s Facebook’s Deal With Donald Trump?

 

Zuckerberg once wanted to sanction Trump. Then Facebook wrote rules that accommodated him.

 

Peter Thiel Claimed Zuckerberg Agreed to Push ‘State-Sanctioned Conservatism’ Under Trump Deal

 

Zuckerberg’s secret deal with Trump administration Is it the reason Facebook avoided heavy regulation?

 

The cult doesn’t mind when the FBI, DOJ and BIG TECH (lmao) sides w Donald but as soon as Donald goes too far (cuz he always does) - those entities reverse course and the cult goes nuts.

 

idiots 


what is the fbi covering up for joe and hunter? You want them investigated to clear this misunderstanding up right?

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aristocrat said:


what is the fbi covering up for joe and hunter? You want them investigated to clear this misunderstanding up right?


Hunter is already under investigation - what more do you want?

 

And if Joe Biden is corrupt - lock him up - who gives a F?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...