Jump to content

Democracy’s Fiery Ordeal: The War in Ukraine 🇺🇦


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

VLADIMIR Putin's Black Sea fleet headquarters was blitzed by a fiery Ukrainian Storm Shadow missile attack today.

Footage shows black smoke billowing from the burning and partially collapsed building in the Russian-held Crimean city of Sevastopol after Kyiv's latest assault on the peninsula.

 

https://www.the-sun.com/news/9153595/explosions-putin-black-sea-crimea/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

VLADIMIR Putin's Black Sea fleet headquarters was blitzed by a fiery Ukrainian Storm Shadow missile attack today.

Footage shows black smoke billowing from the burning and partially collapsed building in the Russian-held Crimean city of Sevastopol after Kyiv's latest assault on the peninsula.

 

https://www.the-sun.com/news/9153595/explosions-putin-black-sea-crimea/

Brit Storm Shadow missile

 

Then we can give them some long-range missiles as well.

 

and just hope Putin doesn't rain down supersonics on Kiev, again.

 

"If you know others and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know others but know yourself, you win one and lose one; if you do not know others and do not know yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle"

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biden quietly smashing up Putin's fascist military. No bluster, no lies, no conspiracy garbage, just results 

 Bye bye 

 

President Joe Biden has told his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, that the United States will provide a small number of long-range missiles to aid the war with Russia, three U.S. officials and a congressional official familiar with the discussions told NBC News on Friday.

The officials, who were not authorized to speak publicly, did not say when the missiles would be delivered or when a public announcement would be made.

For months, Ukraine has asked for the Army Tactical Missile System, known as ATACMS, which would give Kyiv the ability to strike targets from as far away as about 180 miles, hitting supply lines, railways, and command and control locations behind the Russian front lines.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russia-ukraine-war-atacms-biden-zelenskyy-long-range-missile-rcna116876

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

Biden quietly smashing up Putin's fascist military. No bluster, no lies, no conspiracy garbage, just results 

 Bye bye 

 

President Joe Biden has told his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, that the United States will provide a small number of long-range missiles to aid the war with Russia, three U.S. officials and a congressional official familiar with the discussions told NBC News on Friday.

The officials, who were not authorized to speak publicly, did not say when the missiles would be delivered or when a public announcement would be made.

For months, Ukraine has asked for the Army Tactical Missile System, known as ATACMS, which would give Kyiv the ability to strike targets from as far away as about 180 miles, hitting supply lines, railways, and command and control locations behind the Russian front lines.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russia-ukraine-war-atacms-biden-zelenskyy-long-range-missile-rcna116876

Heck yeah. escalation is awesome.

 

for your stocks. not so much the people of Ukraine

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


 

Rand Paul Issues Stark Warning To Biden, Senate, & House About Ukraine Funding'

 

Rand Paul: "I rise to put the leadership of the house, the senate, and the POTUS on notice. I will not consent to any expedited passage of any spending bill that provides any more American aid to Ukraine. It's as if no one has noticed that we have no extra money to send to Ukraine. Our deficit this year will exceed 1.5 trillion dollars borrowing money from China to send it to Ukraine, makes no sense."

 

"Ukraine is one of the most CORRUPT countries on the planet..." Watch

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, B-Man said:


 

Rand Paul Issues Stark Warning To Biden, Senate, & House About Ukraine Funding'

 

Rand Paul: "I rise to put the leadership of the house, the senate, and the POTUS on notice. I will not consent to any expedited passage of any spending bill that provides any more American aid to Ukraine. It's as if no one has noticed that we have no extra money to send to Ukraine. Our deficit this year will exceed 1.5 trillion dollars borrowing money from China to send it to Ukraine, makes no sense."

 

"Ukraine is one of the most CORRUPT countries on the planet..." Watch

 

 


why isn’t anyone asking why we haven’t forced Russia and Ukraine to the table to end this? 
 

It’s clear we are funding this proxy war, marching thousands of another countries people to die by throwing money at them. 
 

if you zoom out and look at it, it’s so ***** twisted

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


why isn’t anyone asking why we haven’t forced Russia and Ukraine to the table to end this? 
 

It’s clear we are funding this proxy war, marching thousands of another countries people to die by throwing money at them. 
 

if you zoom out and look at it, it’s so ***** twisted

The few times there was any third party talk of negotiations.  The media ignores it. 

 

The goal should always be peace.  The war mongers want more carnage though. 

 

While they drink coffee and eat a warm breakfast this morning. 

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

 

I'm left wondering how Gary states Russians didn't care about Crimea before 2014 knowing that Crimea was part of Russia until Soviet Premier Kruschev, an ethnic Ukranian, issued a decree transfering it to Ukraine?

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


why isn’t anyone asking why we haven’t forced Russia and Ukraine to the table to end this? 
 

It’s clear we are funding this proxy war, marching thousands of another countries people to die by throwing money at them. 
 

if you zoom out and look at it, it’s so ***** twisted

 

37 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

The few times there was any third party talk of negotiations.  The media ignores it. 

 

The goal should always be peace.  The war mongers want more carnage though. 

 

While they drink coffee and eat a warm breakfast this morning. 

 

 

 

 

 

The Economist says we must prepare for a forever war in Ukraine

 

The latest edition of The Economist outlines what the next phase of the Ukraine war will look like. So here’s what you need to know about the future of the conflict — straight from the mouth of the Western agenda-setters themselves.

 

The Economist starts out by finally acknowledging that the counteroffensive — which it has been hyping for months — has been a catastrophic failure: “Ukraine has liberated less than 0.25% of the territory that Russia occupied in June. The 1,000km front line has barely shifted”.

 

This is what 40,000 Ukrainians died for (official estimate, so probably more). And what’s worse, this was entirely predictable ― and indeed had been predicted. Absolutely unconscionable.

 

However, The Economist immediately goes on to say that: “Asking for a ceasefire or peace talks is pointless. Vladimir Putin shows no sign of wanting to negotiate and, even if he did, could not be trusted to stick to a deal. ... [A]ny ceasefire would simply be a pause to re-arm and get ready to attack again. If Ukrainians stop fighting, they could lose their country”.

 

That’s interesting because it is Russia that, in the months and weeks leading up to the invasion, repeatedly looked for a diplomatic solution to avoid war, only to be systematically dismissed by the West (“Putin’s continuing commitment to a peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian crisis was ... evident”, writes historian Geoffrey Roberts in a study for the Journal of Military and Strategic Studies: jmss.org/article/view/7...) and it is Russia that, in the weeks following the invasion, engaged in several diplomatic initiatives that were systematically sabotaged by the West. As for using the ceasefire as a ploy to re-arm, well that’s exactly what Ukraine and the West have admitted to have used the Minsk agreements to do (unherd.com/thepost/were…) — so this seems like a classic case of projection at best.

 

That said, it is true that reaching an agreement now is harder because Washington’s derailment of peace talks early in the war have allowed Russia to gain a tactical advantage which now makes a negotiated settlement much more difficult to achieve. On top of the fact that Russia has many more reasons for not trusting the West than vice versa. But that’s no excuse for the West to not even consider sitting down at the negotiating table, of course.

 

So if there is no realistic basis to believe that Ukraine has the capacity to attain its stated strategic objective of reclaiming all (or any, at this point) Russian-controlled territories, as even The Economist admits, but peace (or even a ceasefire) is not an option — then what options are left?

 

 

https://twitter.com/battleforeurope/status/1705206986290147533

 

 

F6oR61IWQAAKvB8?format=webp&name=900x900

 

 

Is this the world we want to live in?

 

 

 

.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been a lot of chatter about this in last 24 hrs

 

 

40 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

I'm left wondering how Gary states Russians didn't care about Crimea before 2014 knowing that Crimea was part of Russia until Soviet Premier Kruschev, an ethnic Ukranian, issued a decree transfering it to Ukraine?

You mean before Russia illegally annexed it ( temporarily) in 2014? 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Been a lot of chatter about this in last 24 hrs

 

 

You mean before Russia illegally annexed it ( temporarily) in 2014? 

Objectively in times of war I don't think anyone is ever too concerned about the legal status of the conflict and reality is they're not going to be expelled by what's left of the Ukranian military absent direct NATO/US involvement in combat operations.  And that's not likely. 

That's just how it looks and all the wishful thinking and cheerleading is not going to supply what is needed to remove the occupiers which is effective combat soldiers.  

 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...