Jump to content

Critical Race Theory


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

 Our slavery was a race based system 

That's true....but it was not created to perpetuate some deep seated racism. As someone else here already said, it based on the economics of needing cheap labor.  Which is the same reason why the Jewish people were forced to build bricks for Pharaoh.  It's been the same with different people(s) all throughout history.  With the advent of the Industrial Revolution, and the significant lessening of the need for a large, manual labor force....things have changed. It's pretty simple really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SoCal Deek said:

That's true....but it was not created to perpetuate some deep seated racism. As someone else here already said, it based on the economics of needing cheap labor.   

Not true. Racism was used to divide the working class. Bacon's rebellion saw white and black people working together and so the laws were changed so that blacks became permanent slaves. 

 

This idea that economics can explain away racism is just silly. They could of just paid them like they paid the whites, but they used racism to not to have to pay them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Not true. Racism was used to divide the working class. Bacon's rebellion saw white and black people working together and so the laws were changed so that blacks became permanent slaves. 

 

This idea that economics can explain away racism is just silly. They could of just paid them like they paid the whites, but they used racism to not to have to pay them. 


Economics doesn’t explain away racism you dolt.  It explains why people are taken advantage of.  You know how you love your cheap labor coming across our southern border.  Funny how you’re AOK with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Not true. Racism was used to divide the working class. Bacon's rebellion saw white and black people working together and so the laws were changed so that blacks became permanent slaves. 

 

This idea that economics can explain away racism is just silly. They could of just paid them like they paid the whites, but they used racism to not to have to pay them. 

You bring up a good historical reference and come to the complete wrong conclusion. The ruling elites did not care about separating Blacks and Whites until it threatened their financial interests, then they used race to cement their own financial well being. Also why pay someone when you can make excuses about race to get it for free? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

You bring up a good historical reference and come to the complete wrong conclusion. The ruling elites did not care about separating Blacks and Whites until it threatened their financial interests, then they used race to cement their own financial well being. Also why pay someone when you can make excuses about race to get it for free? 

Holding slaves was not without cost to the slave owner. They provided clothing, housing, food, etc. That doesn’t make it good, but the labor wasn’t free. 

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Not true. Racism was used to divide the working class. Bacon's rebellion saw white and black people working together and so the laws were changed so that blacks became permanent slaves. 

 

This idea that economics can explain away racism is just silly. They could of just paid them like they paid the whites, but they used racism to not to have to pay them. 

There’s clearly some truth to that but I think this entire debate is akin to the chicken and the egg. I’ve yet to read a single opinion on here defending either slavery or racism…so I remain confused as to what you want anyone to say.

Edited by SoCal Deek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

Holding slaves was not without cost to the slave owner. They provided clothing, housing, food, etc. That doesn’t make it good, but the labor wasn’t free. 

There’s clearly some truth to that but I think this entire debate is akin to the chicken and the egg. I’ve yet to read a single opinion on here defending either slavery or racism…so I remain confused as to what you want anyone to say.

The south started the Civil War because they could not get their way with slavery policy. That's what we are talking about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The south started the Civil War because they could not get their way with slavery policy. That's what we are talking about. 

Did anyone say something else? Where you’re getting pushback is that I believe many on here think you’re pushing the notion that the south was desperate to institutionalize “racism”. While similar, it’s not the same. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Did anyone say something else? Where you’re getting pushback is that I believe many on here think you’re pushing the notion that the south was desperate to institutionalize “racism”. While similar, it’s not the same. 

Racism was a key cause of the worst war in American history 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Let’s say it was….now skip ahead in your textbook and you’ll see that the non racist side WON!!! 

After terrible losses and then it went to Jim Crow, based up Critical Race attitudes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

After terrible losses and then it went to Jim Crow, based up Critical Race attitudes. 

You’re living in a time warp. Would you suggest that nobody in the US travel to Germany? Should Germany not be a member of NATO? That nation’s racially motivated extermination plan resulted in the murder of millions of innocent people…and all of that happened in just the last century. Do we ask Germany to take a knee at the Olympic Games? At the World Cup? Where is ANY of this going? There are no slave owners alive today and a good portion of the United States wasn’t even part of the country during the Civil War. And…a good portion of the part that was actually fought and DIED to confront and defeat it. Enough already!!!!

Edited by SoCal Deek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Hey @Tiberius - told ya.

 

They always bail.  They are only conditioned so far to take a debate.

 

Meanwhile - can you believe what the democrats did again? 
 

Banning all these books?

 


Cc: @Doc

 

 

do you have the cliff notes on #41?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BillStime said:


Hey @Tiberius - told ya.

 

They always bail.  They are only conditioned so far to take a debate.

 

Meanwhile - can you believe what the democrats did again? 
 

Banning all these books?

 


Cc: @Doc

 

 


Ha. Of all people to give people ***** regarding lack of debate.  You wouldn’t know how to debate if it hit you in the face. 
 

Carry on lack of awareness boy. 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


Ha. Of all people to give people ***** regarding lack of debate.  You wouldn’t know how to debate if it hit you in the face. 
 

Carry on lack of awareness boy. 🙄


Jim‼️‼️‼️‼️- you’re always there to bail out your keepers. 
 

And Jim - I don’t shy away from debate and you know it

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:


Jim‼️‼️‼️‼️- you’re always there to bail out your keepers. 
 

And Jim - I don’t shy away from debate and you know it

 

 

Oh for crying out loud. You shy away from debate constantly.  You cry “oh rabbit hole” “you only ask questions!!!”   Dude…..that’s a ***** debate.   Maybe try it sometime. 

 

Let’s start now ok?

 

Who are my keepers and how am I bailing them out?  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Oh for crying out loud. You shy away from debate constantly.  You cry “oh rabbit hole” “you only ask questions!!!”   Dude…..that’s a ***** debate.   Maybe try it sometime. 

 

Let’s start now ok?

 

Who are my keepers and how am I bailing them out?  
 

 

 

See? You don't debate. You deflect and jump right into the weeds on irrelevant topics.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

You’re living in a time warp. Would you suggest that nobody in the US travel to Germany? Should Germany not be a member of NATO? That nation’s racially motivated extermination plan resulted in the murder of millions of innocent people…and all of that happened in just the last century. Do we ask Germany to take a knee at the Olympic Games? At the World Cup? Where is ANY of this going? There are no slave owners alive today and a good portion of the United States wasn’t even part of the country during the Civil War. And…a good portion of the part that was actually fought and DIED to confront and defeat it. Enough already!!!!

I’ve lived there, I believe the reason, and you are totally correct is they aren’t able to successfully use the jewish population there as a political asset they way politicians here use this area here.

 

I will say the one noticeable trait is overt  nationalism tends to be discouraged. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

Both can be true. 


Yes but the economics trump the racial aspect. You find a group of people that will allow you to take advantage of them, enslave them to do your work for little or no money they will be abused regardless of their race or religion.  Just look at the history of slavery 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

See? You don't debate. You deflect and jump right into the weeds on irrelevant topics.

 


Thank you for proving my point. How is asking you to clarify a point YOU made getting into to the weeds and irrelevant?  Questioning your point to understand it so it can be argued against is the whole ***** basis of debate.  It’s called Socratic Method.  
 

You’re a mental midget who reduces the IQ of anyone who comes in contact with you. So reply to this with your silly laughing emoji while I put you back on ignore. Sigh….

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Sure, use racism to economically exploit people. 

 

1 hour ago, Chef Jim said:


Yes but the economics trump the racial aspect. You find a group of people that will allow you to take advantage of them, enslave them to do your work for little or no money they will be abused regardless of their race or religion.  Just look at the history of slavery 

 
it’s actually an interesting chicken egg question… .

 

Does racism lead to economic exploitation or does intent on economic exploitation lead to racism? 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

 
it’s actually an interesting chicken egg question… .

 

Does racism lead to economic exploitation or does intent on economic exploitation lead to racism? 
 

 


It’s a great debate topic. @BillStime  sit this one pie. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Superintendent Proudly Declares His District Is Using Critical Race Theory in the Classroom

 

8c4c0fb4-8f8c-420d-a392-ec11c2134ef1-860

 

 

 

 

https://redstate.com/jeffc/2022/04/21/superintendent-proudly-declares-his-district-is-using-critical-race-theory-in-the-classroom-n553856

 

 

 

And this has Republicans in Alabama and Mississippi scared? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

And this has Republicans in Alabama and Mississippi scared? 


Quite the opposite Tibsy. 
 

It is not just house and senate Democrats that will find that out in November. 
 

The local elections across the country will demonstrate how Americans feel about having CRT forced on their children. 
 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

 
it’s actually an interesting chicken egg question… .

 

Does racism lead to economic exploitation or does intent on economic exploitation lead to racism? 
 

 

Humans have no inherent need to be racist. They do however have an inherent need to survive and sustain themselves. Are you humans tribal? Yes. Are they then by definition racist? To a point maybe, but the tribalism is the driving criteria…not racism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Humans have no inherent need to be racist. They do however have an inherent need to survive and sustain themselves. Are you humans tribal? Yes. Are they then by definition racist? To a point maybe, but the tribalism is the driving criteria…not racism.

 

I got a "B" on my English paper in college because my professor said that racism didn't exist when Othelo was written.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, BuffaninSarasota said:

an inconvenient truth


Speaking of inconveniences:

 

On 4/20/2022 at 12:56 PM, BuffaninSarasota said:

it's you and the militant left trying to transform America into your dystopian version of reality. It's your "team" that started this nonsense 18 months ago, not my side.


Tic toc tic toc tic toc 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, B-Man said:


Quite the opposite Tibsy. 
 

It is not just house and senate Democrats that will find that out in November. 
 

The local elections across the country will demonstrate how Americans feel about having CRT forced on their children. 
 

 

 


I remember how confident you, DR and the rest of the cult was feeling about the election in 2020.

 

lolz

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...