Orlando Tim Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 12 hours ago, B-Man said: Where we are............ I Find it interesting the prosecutor finds "emotional distress" from people having to hide for a few hours but no ability to prosecute to benefit the people who had their homes and businesses burned to the ground all over the country. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 2 hours ago, BillStime said: Gym shouldn’t be in Congress let alone the 1/6 select committee. Why? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 10 minutes ago, Doc said: Why? Ask the boys that were molested under his watch. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 1 hour ago, Buffalo Timmy said: I Find it interesting the prosecutor finds "emotional distress" from people having to hide for a few hours but no ability to prosecute to benefit the people who had their homes and businesses burned to the ground all over the country. Twitter has shadow banned Michael Tracey. I never see his tweets anymore. Saw them for all of 2020. Barely seen since January if at all. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
716er Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 Jordan and Banks rejected by Pelosi. What a shame 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 1 hour ago, 716er said: Jordan and Banks rejected by Pelosi. What a shame Hilarous - hearing these guys bich cuz their nomination was rejected. The GQP could have voted for a bi partisan committee and they voted against it. Tough schittt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 22 minutes ago, BillStime said: Hilarous - hearing these guys bich cuz their nomination was rejected. The GQP could have voted for a bi partisan committee and they voted against it. Tough schittt Who’s that liberal on the intelligence committee who was sleeping with a Chinese spy for a few years? Where was your outrage then? You’re a fraud. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 34 minutes ago, BillStime said: Hilarous - hearing these guys bich cuz their nomination was rejected. The GQP could have voted for a bi partisan committee and they voted against it. Tough schittt Asking for the rest of us: Once you get your beloved One Party Rule will you promise to STFU? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 31 minutes ago, Bidens_basement said: Who’s that liberal on the intelligence committee who was sleeping with a Chinese spy for a few years? Where was your outrage then? You’re a fraud. I smell fear 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nineforty Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 Don't forget, it is already a bipartisan committee. Liz Cheney is on it. Seems like every outlet, regardless of leaning is getting this wrong. (and spare me any rebuttal that involves 'RINO' in the sentence). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 29 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Asking for the rest of us: Once you get your beloved One Party Rule will you promise to STFU? Laughable coming from someone who puts party over country/constitution. Oh, and: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 Just now, BillStime said: Laughable coming from someone who puts party over country/constitution. Oh, and: Party over country? Yawn 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 1 minute ago, BillStime said: Laughable coming from someone who puts party over country/constitution. Oh, and: Oh the hypocrisy drips thickly off this one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 7 minutes ago, Nineforty said: Don't forget, it is already a bipartisan committee. Liz Cheney is on it. Seems like every outlet, regardless of leaning is getting this wrong. (and spare me any rebuttal that involves 'RINO' in the sentence). 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 1 minute ago, BillStime said: Hypocrisy runs deep Into your life it will creep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nineforty Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 41 minutes ago, Bidens_basement said: Who’s that liberal on the intelligence committee who was sleeping with a Chinese spy for a few years? Where was your outrage then? You’re a fraud. This is called what-about-ism. You sir are engaging in it. Hostile and friendly nations have spies in our country trying to reach members of both parties at all times. Anyone shown to have acted against the interests of this country should be punished/jailed. Anyone who unknowingly gets wrapped up as Swalwell did (when he was not an intelligence committee member, btw) should be voted out by their constituents, at a minimum. I would be okay with losing Committee assignments as well. But I still think anyone who has a whiff of corruption should be gone/voted out. So I'm sure we agree there on some level. https://www.axios.com/china-spy-california-politicians-9d2dfb99-f839-4e00-8bd8-59dec0daf589.html honeypots have plenty of targets. about 3,776,294,273 of them. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
716er Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 McCarthy should be the first witness called 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 This Select Committee would be far more productive if they could finally tell us whether it was a forward lateral. (I still say it was!) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 (edited) 13 minutes ago, 716er said: McCarthy should be the first witness called What questions would you ask? 2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: This Select Committee would be far more productive if they could finally tell us whether it was a forward lateral. (I still say it was!) Ahhhh the never say die Bill's fan. It wasn't. Edited July 21, 2021 by Chef Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 lmao 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts