Jump to content

Colin Kaepernick was Right


Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Education. 

 

Aaaaaaaaand GO!

 

Integration of suburban and urban students. 

 

Stop over-policing of schools. 

 

Equity in funding (pretty well done here in NYS, in my opinion) 

 

Better representation of SOC in gifted and talented programs 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Integration of suburban and urban students. 

 

Stop over-policing of schools. 

 

Equity in funding (pretty well done here in NYS, in my opinion) 

 

Better representation of SOC in gifted and talented programs 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Integration of suburban and urban students. 

     So you're for busing and forced integration?  So who gets bused where?  Suburban to Urban or Urban to Suburban and how do you determine who goes where?

     What will be accomplished by this?

 

Stop over-policing of schools.

     Over-policing in what way?   

 

Equity in funding (pretty well done here in NYS, in my opinion) 

    Where will this funding come from?  Once it comes in then what?

 

Better representation of SOC in gifted and talented programs 

     I was just typing "pardon my ignorance, but what is SOC"  and then it hit me. Students of color.  :rolleyes:  There is one race that is very well represented in Gifted and Talented programs.  They have been for decades.  In your mind, why is that?  

 

My responses are above. 

Edited by Chef Jim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/27/2020 at 7:09 AM, SectionC3 said:

 

Hoax.  We have dead people in Kenosha because a vigilante with a rifle unnecessarily put himself in a bad spot.  

 

And, let’s not get distracted here.  You apparently believe in equality of outcome.  That, sir, is socialist.  Or maybe even communist.  You’d think the intellectual standard bearer of the alt-wrong would know this.  But you don’t.  Or maybe it’s that you’re a secret communist.  That, frankly, seems more likely.  

 

Stop wasting taxpayer dollars and get back to work!

 

So now we're holding people accountable for 'unnecessarily putting yourself in a bad spot'?   Oh!  Guess we can stop with all the faux outrage over criminals getting shot while resisting arrest, huh?

Edited by KD in CA
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

So now we're holding people accounting for 'unnecessarily putting yourself in a bad spot'?   Oh!  Guess we can stop with all the faux outrage over criminals getting shot while resisting arrest, huh?


If a girl at a frat party kills a guy trying to rape her, it’s her fault for putting herself in a bad situation?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, dubs said:

Good idea for brand new thread, definitely couldn’t have put this half-baked gibberish into one of dozens of other threads talking about race. classic c-section. 
 


 

 

 

...thought you get 500 bucks for starting a new thread?......the lawyerly 3rd chair doesn't pay squat.....and how do you post for hours daily?...what about your client(s)??.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

So now we're holding people accounting for 'unnecessarily putting yourself in a bad spot'?   Oh!  Guess we can stop with all the faux outrage over criminals getting shot while resisting arrest, huh?

 

Notice the renaissance of the "She was asking for it by wearing a short skirt" defense lately?   By an apparent attorney, no less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

So now we're holding people accounting for 'unnecessarily putting yourself in a bad spot'?   Oh!  Guess we can stop with all the faux outrage over criminals getting shot while resisting arrest, huh?

 

This should be interesting...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Notice the renaissance of the "She was asking for it by wearing a short skirt" defense lately?   By an apparent attorney, no less.

 

We were having a discussing with my dad several years ago about this.  His "lady friend" at the time was quietly sipping her cocktail as we discussed it.  Then my dad dropped the "she was asking for it...." and his friend said "oh ***** you!!"  It was awesome.  Should have married her dad. I would have loved having her as a step-mom.  LOL 

Just now, Big Blitz said:

Can someone explain to me why the cops were dealing with this man and why he got shot?  What were the circumstances here?

 

Thank you.  

 

 

 

(Yes, I know what happened I'm trying to prove a point that everything is stupid).

 

PPP does a fantastic job of pointing out every day that "everything is stupid."  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GG said:

 

Notice the renaissance of the "She was asking for it by wearing a short skirt" defense lately?   By an apparent attorney, no less.

 

She was just asking for her hair to be sniffed.....she was probably a Breck girl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/27/2020 at 2:10 PM, KD in CA said:

 

So now we're holding people accounting for 'unnecessarily putting yourself in a bad spot'?   Oh!  Guess we can stop with all the faux outrage over criminals getting shot while resisting arrest, huh?

 

Drop that Mic.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

@SectionC3

 

???

 

Oh, forgot about that.  Where's the money coming from?  Same place as every other like initiative.  State and federal budget.  You'll probably say, "But you're not specific!"  OK.  So I'll start with taking all of the monies dedicated to the Trump Wall, which apparently can be destroyed with a rubber mallet, and directing them toward this purpose.  

 

Other points:  no cops with visible guns within schools.  Not necessary.  Adds to feeling militarization of schools.  And intimidates SOC, who already have enough problems trusting police. 

 

And on the trust point?  Community policing.  No-brainer. Buffalo is going back to it (in baby steps).  Should be the same everywhere.  Can't have the paramilitary types from Wales policing people in Buffalo.  Problems are inevitable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Oh, forgot about that.  Where's the money coming from?  Same place as every other like initiative.  State and federal budget.  You'll probably say, "But you're not specific!"  OK.  So I'll start with taking all of the monies dedicated to the Trump Wall, which apparently can be destroyed with a rubber mallet, and directing them toward this purpose.  

 

Other points:  no cops with visible guns within schools.  Not necessary.  Adds to feeling militarization of schools.  And intimidates SOC, who already have enough problems trusting police. 

 

And on the trust point?  Community policing.  No-brainer. Buffalo is going back to it (in baby steps).  Should be the same everywhere.  Can't have the paramilitary types from Wales policing people in Buffalo.  Problems are inevitable. 

 

Let's do the math.  A quick search shows that $3.8b has been allocated to the wall.   There are 50,000,000 students in the us.  That allocates a whopping $76 per student.  Awesome!

 

No cops with guns.  Not necessary.  I agree.  So  cops with guns ONLY intimidates students of color.  Please link to the research that shows that.  You mention that SOC have more problems than SWOC have.  What are those problems and where do those problems arise from?   

 

Your last point.  Not sure what you're referring to in our conversation.  

 

You didn't address my response to you regarding forced integration. Please explain how this will work and what will be the benefits.  I'm not saying there are no benefits of this I just would like to hear from you.  

 

You also didn't address my final point about why some SOC have done extremely well on gifted and talented programs while others have not?   Why have some done very well while others have not?  What are the differences between those that excel and those that don't?  

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...over the hill, figured out and ineffective Kaep is the epitome of "the BLM Matters Gimme Crowd"......annual salary NFL salary cap per club is $198 mil......based on a 53 man roster, that's annual salary of $3.735 mil per player of which are reported to be 80% black.....so where is the racially charged disparity?...of the $6.336 BILLION, 80% or $5.068 BILLION goes to black players....didn't HE opt out of $12 mil from Niners and turn down similar, subsequent offers?......what is his beef then?.......beyond my pay grade to figure out I guess.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

 

 

Other points:  no cops with visible guns within schools.  Not necessary.  Adds to feeling militarization of schools.  And intimidates SOC, who already have enough problems trusting police. 

 

 

Our school district and our town which is very large has armed police in each of several middle schools and each of 5 high schools.  Possibly the elementary schools too.  I don't know.   I'm thankful that police are present.  It's a deterrent and in the event of an attack like we've seen in other parts of the country, it can save lives.  Having police in schools should provide positive interactions with the students which can build trust.  You want to eliminate that opportunity.  Fortunately, this is still a state or city or district choice and should remain so. 

Edited by keepthefaith
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

 

You also didn't address my final point about why some SOC have done extremely well on gifted and talented programs while others have not?   Why have some done very well while others have not?  What are the differences between those that excel and those that don't?  

 

 

God given talent which is not racial, effort, interest in learning, home/parenting environment, influence from teachers/peers, personal priorities and goals. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/28/2020 at 2:15 PM, Chef Jim said:

 

Let's do the math.  A quick search shows that $3.8b has been allocated to the wall.   There are 50,000,000 students in the us.  That allocates a whopping $76 per student.  Awesome!

 

No cops with guns.  Not necessary.  I agree.  So  cops with guns ONLY intimidates students of color.  Please link to the research that shows that.  You mention that SOC have more problems than SWOC have.  What are those problems and where do those problems arise from?   

 

Your last point.  Not sure what you're referring to in our conversation.  

 

You didn't address my response to you regarding forced integration. Please explain how this will work and what will be the benefits.  I'm not saying there are no benefits of this I just would like to hear from you.  

 

You also didn't address my final point about why some SOC have done extremely well on gifted and talented programs while others have not?   Why have some done very well while others have not?  What are the differences between those that excel and those that don't?  

 

 

 

 

 

Here's your Rule #2 @SectionC3

 

Or is this rule #1? 

 

I don't know the details of the rules.  Regardless you bailed on our debate. 

Edited by Chef Jim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Here's your Rule #2 @SectionC3

 

Or is this rule #1? 

 

I don't know the details of the rules.  Regardless you bailed on our debate. 

 

Hoax.  Rule #2 wasn’t created until last Friday, which, of course, was after that “debate.”   Here’s my Rule #2 explanation for that point:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Hoax.  Rule #2 wasn’t created until last Friday, which, of course, was after that “debate.”   Here’s my Rule #2 explanation for that point:

 

 

Seriously?  This is what you're going with?   

 

Pathetic.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Seriously?  This is what you're going with?   

 

Pathetic.  

You alleged a Rule #2 violation, sir.  That was a hoax.  I explained as much  above.  Before you invoke the rules, it would be good to perhaps read them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

You alleged a Rule #2 violation, sir.  That was a hoax.  I explained as much  above.  Before you invoke the rules, it would be good to perhaps read them. 

 

I'm a rebel.  I don't play by the rules.  Rules are for people who can't think for themselves.  And whose Rules are these?  

 

Hey speaking of thinking.  Care to address my questions to you from above.  I was looking for a debate that your Bidened out on.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

I'm a rebel.  I don't play by the rules.  Rules are for people who can't think for themselves.  And whose Rules are these?  

 

Hey speaking of thinking.  Care to address my questions to you from above.  I was looking for a debate that your Bidened out on.  

Get the whole conversation for me and I will be happy to revisit it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

It's all right here Sue. 

 

...how come he's ALWAYS here posting versus serving his 242 page client list?......wonder if his "legal briefs" refers to what he's wearing today versus "legal boxers"??...just askin'......defense rests...........

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...LMAO.......you're pretty lofty....I was thinking Craigslist ads.......FERTILIZER/FARM & GARDEN works...................

Rule #1.

1 hour ago, Chef Jim said:


Look. The thread is four pages.  You can do it man.  
 

Maybe if you stopped being so ***** boring with your “hoax” posts you’d have time. 

I think I invoked rule #2 earlier.  Please comply. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...