GG Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 5 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: Even viewing this through a principled prism it looks like a bad decision for a 17 year old IMO. That's why the best takeaway was that the kids are out there running wild, and the adults need to step in to restore order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 6 hours ago, Golden Goat said: Did you seriously just call a handicapped gentleman a "a cripple?" Or is that only offensive when someone else does it? Care to answer the question o mental cripple? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 Falling apart.......... 58 minutes ago, BillStime said: would you be defending this terrorist if he were black? 7 minutes ago, Kemp said: Care to answer the question o mental cripple? Lefty media and pols have fallen into a Kyle Rittenhouse trap by Thomas Lifson Original Article 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 5 hours ago, aristocrat said: because he is still under arrest for violating the protective order for the sexual assault he committed 1. Accused of, not committed. Know the difference? 2. Could he escape if unshackled? 3. Did he deserve 7 in the back? 1 minute ago, B-Man said: Falling apart.......... Lefty media and pols have fallen into a Kyle Rittenhouse trap by Thomas Lifson Original Article That's 2 non-answers and counting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilzfancy Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 2 minutes ago, Kemp said: 1. Accused of, not committed. Know the difference? 2. Could he escape if unshackled? 3. Did he deserve 7 in the back? No, 1 in the nuts would have worked.....you mock a caregiver but want to protect a sexual assault scumbag, good to know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 1 minute ago, bilzfancy said: No, 1 in the nuts would have worked.....you mock a caregiver but want to protect a sexual assault scumbag, good to know Still preaching stupid I see. Should people accused of sexual assault be shot? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 THEY NEVER OBJECT TO VIOLENCE WHEN IT’S THEIR PEOPLE DOING IT: Seen on Facebook: “Liberals are now upset about ‘armed vigilantism’ but still not upset about riots and looting.” I’ve been warning for a while that the breakdown of law and order won’t go as they hope. Ultimately, the police are there to protect criminals from the populace, not the other way around. Get rid of the police, and armed vigilantism is what you’ll get. And what you’ll deserve. UPDATE: Some people are figuring it out, as this article in The Atlantic illustrates: The Violence Could Get Much Worse: Unless police and political leaders begin to crack down on the armed vigilantes monitoring protests, more bloodshed could soon follow the killings in Kenosha. SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY: Kenosha police find helmets, gas masks, more in out-of-state vehicles; arrest 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilzfancy Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 15 minutes ago, Kemp said: Still preaching stupid I see. Should people accused of sexual assault be shot? when they resist arrest and threaten police with a knife, yes, in the nuts so he can no longer have kids, that he would abuse,..... why haven't you apologized for mocking a caregiver yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 SHOT: How Chaos in Kenosha Is Already Swaying Some Voters in Wisconsin: As residents see fires and looting, some worry that local Democratic leaders are failing to keep control of the situation. Chaser: Remember When a Democratic Polling Firm Fired the Guy Who Thought Violent Protests Could Backfire Politically? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 All these right wing lies and excuses and even glorification of the boy soldier sent out to kill by right wing propaganda reminded me of Holocaust denial and I remember that the Trump Junta had actually engaged in this. The first enemy of Nazis is the truth https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/the-trump-administrations-softcore-holocaust-denial/514974/ Holocaust denial is alive and well in the highest offices of the United States. It is being spread by those in President Trump’s innermost circle. It may have all started as a mistake by a new administration that is loath to admit it’s wrong. Conversely, it may be a conscious attempt by people with anti-Semitic sympathies to rewrite history. Either way it is deeply disturbing. The de-Judaization of the Holocaust, as exemplified by the White House statement, is what I term softcore Holocaust denial.... What we saw from the White House was classic softcore denial. The Holocaust was de-Judaized. It is possible that it all began with a mistake. Someone simply did not realize what they were doing. It is also possible that someone did this deliberately. The White House’s chief strategist, Steve Bannon, boasted that while at Breitbart he created a platform for alt-right. Richard Spencer, the self-proclaimed leader of the alt-right, has invited overt Holocaust deniers to alt-right conferences, and his followers have engaged in outright denial. During the campaign, he was reportedly responsible for speeches and ads that many observers concluded trafficked in anti-Semitic tropes. After Hicks’s defense of the statement, Chief of Staff Reince Priebus doubled down, insisting that they made no mistake. On Meet the Press Chuck Todd gave Priebus repeated chances to retract or rephrase the statement. Priebus refused and dug in deeper, declaring “everyone’s suffering in the Holocaust, including obviously, all of the Jewish people… [was] extraordinarily sad.” In the penultimate sentence of the president’s statement on Holocaust Remembrance Day, the White House promised to ensure that “the forces of evil never again defeat the powers of good.” But the statement was issued on the same day as the order banning refugees. It is hard not to conclude that this is precisely what happened at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue on Holocaust Remembrance Day. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 More projection ny Tibs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 6 minutes ago, bilzfancy said: when they resist arrest and threaten police with a knife, yes, in the nuts so he can no longer have kids, that he would abuse,..... why haven't you apologized for mocking a caregiver yet? Wow! There you have it. Police should be allowed to pump 7 in a man's back if they claim fear. And you can't figure out why blacks in America are rioting. If blacks were in charge and white men were being executed you would have the same opinion? You are so full of sheet. The alternative is far less flattering. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilzfancy Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 1 minute ago, Wacka said: More projection ny Tibs. Yep. Who is more anti-Semitic then democrats, just look to the "squad" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 35 minutes ago, Kemp said: 3. Did he deserve 7 in the back? Fire until the threat is neutralized. I wasn't there and from the video can't see what the officer saw, but as long as he was trying to retrieve the weapon I would fire. Maybe he should have obey the lawful command of the officer? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilzfancy Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 1 minute ago, Kemp said: Wow! There you have it. Police should be allowed to pump 7 in a man's back if they claim fear. And you can't figure out why blacks in America are rioting. If blacks were in charge and white men were being executed you would have the same opinion? You are so full of sheet. The alternative is far less flattering. I posted 1 shot, in the nuts, good to know you support sexual abusers, yet you mock a caregiver, tells me all I need to know about you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 (edited) 37 minutes ago, Kemp said: Should people accused of sexual assault be shot? When they ignore a lawful order from an officer and reach for a weapon, yes. Edited August 28, 2020 by Gary M 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 16 minutes ago, bilzfancy said: when they resist arrest and threaten police with a knife, yes, in the nuts so he can no longer have kids, that he would abuse,..... why haven't you apologized for mocking a caregiver yet? Who threatened police with a knife? What knife? That punk kid drugged up on right wing propaganda was waving a murder gun and people and the police didn’t shoot him. They just let him walk around with it threatening people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiotAct Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 8 minutes ago, Wacka said: More projection ny Tibs. when in doubt, call the other side Nazis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts