Jump to content

Bills need to get to 81 players by start of TC


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

Without the need to play preseason games, it is probably easier to have a smaller squad so I think they will go right to 80. 

yep, 90 was to have enough players to play 4 games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Dean said:

Honestly,  I'd at least consider going to 90 players on a split squad. More difficult to manage and not ideal under normal circumstances.  But these are far from normal circumstances.  Splitting the squad gives some new players with real potential to make the team a better shot and provides a bit of protection should someone bring Covid into play.

 

Now I'm not saying I would choose the split squad, but I'd sure as hell consider it.

Given how much continuity the Bills have going into this season, I would think that 80 would be the logical choice, perhaps with an emphasis on the thinner positions, like LB. There just aren't going to be as many roster spots to fill this year than there has been for quite some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, matter2003 said:

This is kind of silly on the NFL's part. What do 10 players really mean in the grand scheme of things??


Seems the reasonable guess is with the square footage of some facilities there would be a disparity between teams that could and couldn’t socially distance 90 players. But just a guess.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


Seems the reasonable guess is with the square footage of some facilities there would be a disparity between teams that could and couldn’t socially distance 90 players. But just a guess.

 

OK now that makes sense, but at the end of the day how can they really reconcile socially distancing on one hand with playing football where you are in close proximity to other players? 

 

It makes no sense to have rules requiring social distance 75% of the time that gets tossed out of the window when they practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, matter2003 said:

 

OK now that makes sense, but at the end of the day how can they really reconcile socially distancing on one hand with playing football where you are in close proximity to other players? 

 

It makes no sense to have rules requiring social distance 75% of the time that gets tossed out of the window when they practice.


if you knew a coworker may have it would you be more comfortable being fully distanced 95% of the day with a chance you could come into contact the other 5%?

 

seems easy to point out a steep reduction in risk even if not fully eliminating 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


if you knew a coworker may have it would you be more comfortable being fully distanced 95% of the day with a chance you could come into contact the other 5%?

 

seems easy to point out a steep reduction in risk even if not fully eliminating 

 

They are testing daily aren't they for the first 2 weeks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on now, where’s all the Trent, Murphy haters?? ?

 

Bring our your dead, klank, bring out your dead, klank... listen carefully and you can hear Foster saying “ I’m feeling much better...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real question is whether to split up the starters and roster makers from the non roster makers so you attempt to isolate the guys who you know will be on your team. That’s probably not ideal for practice but it’d be preferred quarantine wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming 8 cuts (I counted 88 on the official roster), here's my 8:

Cam Lewis (with apologies to UB fans)

Ray Ray McCloud

Del'Shawn Phillips

Victor Salako

Brandon Walton

Jonathon Woodard

Bryan Cox

Josh Thomas

 

I didn't want to cut a couple of those guys, but that's the way football works.  There are tough choices sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...