dubs Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 12 hours ago, TH3 said: Apparently Mitt answers to a different God than you Trumpians You shouldn’t put down Mormons, NPC 1
/dev/null Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 So I caught some Trump's victory lap this afternoon and was somewhat disappointed. Don't get me wrong, his Troll level was set on Epic With Turbo Boost. But Trump missed a golden opportunity to join the Democrats in the airing of grievences... Here's the DoJ file on Epstein Seth Rich "robbery" Vince Foster "suicide" Operation Fast & Furious And I've declassified the entire JFK investigation Oh and that Roswell thing, say hello to my little grey friend here 3 2
keepthefaith Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 19 minutes ago, Jaraxxus said: His chief-of-staff is on the board of Burisma. True?
keepthefaith Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Yes. person's name?
Q-baby! Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 3 hours ago, Nanker said: Traditional and proper introduction, “Members of Congress, I have the high privilege and distinct honor of presenting to you the President of the United States.” Speaker Pelosi sent an instant, clear message that civility was out the door with her introduction, “Members of Congress, the President of the United States.” Thus... no handshake. F U Pelosi and you treasonous Dems. You ***** idiot, the “no handshake” came before the introduction. Nice try!
Buffalo_Gal Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 15 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: person's name? Joseph Cofer Black. Read more here 5 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 ..Round 2 with Photo Op Chuck the Schmuck leading the charge...... Trump Impeachment 2.0: Historic fight spurs new probes and clashes even after trial By Ronn Blitzer | Fox News The Senate impeachment trial of President Trump may have ended with an acquittal, but ongoing legal battles and talk of future subpoenas hint that the drama between Congress and the White House is far from over. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., was dismissive of Trump's acquittal, calling it "virtually valueless" and the result of "one of the largest cover-ups in the history of our nation." And remarks from multiple House Democrats show that they are still looking for more information they can use against the president. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-2-0-historic-fight-spurs-new-probes-and-clashes-even-after-trial
Chef Jim Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 Well if Trump is this evil and this stupid whoever runs against him in November should have no problem whatsoever beating him right? Should be like the Chiefs playing a Pop Warner team right? So why the time, energy and money to remove him? He will be gone anyway in less than twelve months right?
Gavin in Va Beach Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 8 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ..Round 2 with Photo Op Chuck the Schmuck leading the charge...... Trump Impeachment 2.0: Historic fight spurs new probes and clashes even after trial By Ronn Blitzer | Fox News The Senate impeachment trial of President Trump may have ended with an acquittal, but ongoing legal battles and talk of future subpoenas hint that the drama between Congress and the White House is far from over. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., was dismissive of Trump's acquittal, calling it "virtually valueless" and the result of "one of the largest cover-ups in the history of our nation." And remarks from multiple House Democrats show that they are still looking for more information they can use against the president. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-2-0-historic-fight-spurs-new-probes-and-clashes-even-after-trial Proof that the Republicans need to play to win, because the Democrats have no qualms about digging up all the dirt they can find to try and derail Trump and Republicans. Corruption needs to be rooted out and the players need to be ARRESTED, no matter where they are found or what letter is beside their name. If no one faces justice from the FISA/Dossier/Spying and all the other crimes we know have been committed, if Comey and Brennan (to name a few) walk because too many people are afraid of what would happen if they were charged with their crimes, then this country is truly *****. 5
Azalin Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 43 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Well if Trump is this evil and this stupid whoever runs against him in November should have no problem whatsoever beating him right? Should be like the Chiefs playing a Pop Warner team right? So why the time, energy and money to remove him? He will be gone anyway in less than twelve months right? Ah, but the Russians will secure the election for him, remember?
Bob in Mich Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 17 hours ago, Foxx said: @Bob in Mich seems i am not the only one to have the thoughts here. https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1225446693614899201 it is going nowhere but, all the same.... Foxx, it is an interesting topic. Thx. Maybe it should be changed. I posed the question 'if you were OK with the ability of the minority to keep from even bringing charges'. If the House process is similar to bringing charges while the Senate holds the trial, should there be a lower bar to formally accuse versus to convict? Again, in question form. I think sometimes people want to fix the 'bad thing' that they perceive happened to them, so they propose a solution that will not allow that particular bad thing to recur. Often I have found that those rapid response solutions may not have thought the possibilities through from every angle. In other words, the fix may address the bad thing that just happened but if not well thought out, can create situations that could be unforeseen.
IDBillzFan Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Gavin in Va Beach said: Proof that the Republicans need to play to win, because the Democrats have no qualms about digging up all the dirt they can find to try and derail Trump and Republicans. Corruption needs to be rooted out and the players need to be ARRESTED, no matter where they are found or what letter is beside their name. If no one faces justice from the FISA/Dossier/Spying and all the other crimes we know have been committed, if Comey and Brennan (to name a few) walk because too many people are afraid of what would happen if they were charged with their crimes, then this country is truly *****. Absolutely. If the Dems are genuinely stupid enough to go to round 2 for impeachment, it's time to open up some vaults.
Foxx Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 31 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Foxx, it is an interesting topic. Thx. Maybe it should be changed. I posed the question 'if you were OK with the ability of the minority to keep from even bringing charges'. If the House process is similar to bringing charges while the Senate holds the trial, should there be a lower bar to formally accuse versus to convict? Again, in question form. I think sometimes people want to fix the 'bad thing' that they perceive happened to them, so they propose a solution that will not allow that particular bad thing to recur. Often I have found that those rapid response solutions may not have thought the possibilities through from every angle. In other words, the fix may address the bad thing that just happened but if not well thought out, can create situations that could be unforeseen. as i stated during our conversation, i don't know what the remedy is or should be. i only know that what just happened was something that the founders greatly feared. as a way to avoid this in the future, there should be some mechanism in place towards that end. if a 2/3rd's majority is required to convict, i see no reason why something along those lines shouldn't be required to initiate such an investigation. again, i know that i am not alone in those thoughts.
B-Man Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 Why I’m Not Upset with Mitt Romney by Michael Brown Original Article Before you crucify me for not condemning “the traitor,” please hear me out. My position has nothing to do with whether I agree with Romney’s “guilty” vote on the first article of impeachment. And it has nothing to do with whether I believe he is a true conservative. Or even a loyal Republican for that matter. It has to do with something far deeper. Are you willing to hear me out? I’m quite aware of the litany of charges against Mitt Romney’s past political record and business dealings .
Bob in Mich Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Gavin in Va Beach said: Proof that the Republicans need to play to win, because the Democrats have no qualms about digging up all the dirt they can find to try and derail Trump and Republicans. Corruption needs to be rooted out and the players need to be ARRESTED, no matter where they are found or what letter is beside their name. If no one faces justice from the FISA/Dossier/Spying and all the other crimes we know have been committed, if Comey and Brennan (to name a few) walk because too many people are afraid of what would happen if they were charged with their crimes, then this country is truly *****. We agree there (bolded). Find out what was at the root of the FISA/Dossier/Spying issues, party affiliation is immaterial. I am not aware what specific evidence possibly incriminates those you are pointing at, but if there is more than accusations, make the case, charge them, and take them to trial. Sometimes I think accusers point to something that is suspicious but then have little proof of any actual misdeed. They just keep implying it looks corrupt without actual proof. Keeping the suspicion afloat can be enough if the accusation was done for political purposes. Half the country thinks that Trump just acted corruptly with the Ukraine saga. It seems many Congressional Repubs were willing to overlook Trump's corruption essentially (for hundreds) out of fear of political repercussions. That is why about half the country thinks we are well on our way to being truly ***** already. Edited February 7, 2020 by Bob in Mich 1
Foxx Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Bob in Mich said: ... Sometimes I think accusers point to something that is suspicious but then have little proof of any actual misdeed. They just keep implying it looks corrupt without actual proof. Keeping the suspicion afloat can be enough if the accusation was done for political purposes. ... ummm... are you referring to the recently just completed impeachment sham? because the description certainly fits. Edited February 7, 2020 by Foxx 5
3rdnlng Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 14 hours ago, keepthefaith said: person's name? It was posted here just a day or two ago but a cursory look didn't bring it up. It was a picture of 4 men on the board.
Foxx Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 13 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: It was posted here just a day or two ago but a cursory look didn't bring it up. It was a picture of 4 men on the board. this one? it was posted in the, 'All Roads Lead to Ukraine' thread. https://twitter.com/rising_serpent/status/1225169907614212096 1
Recommended Posts