Koko78 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: I'm going to guess the release is either going to be Wednesday morning, or whatever the second day is going to be, just to crap on Nadler's show trial... 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said: They've got a funny way of going about it. Reverse psychology/pity votes. If they act stupidly and self-destructive enough, people will feel badly for them and elect them! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the attorney withdrew because Biden is pulling something that is unethical. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: Reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the attorney withdrew because Biden is pulling something that is unethical. Changing lawyers buys you some time from facing justice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 2, 2019 Author Share Posted December 2, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1201566849827311622 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 So if the Senate was Dem majority then Trump would be kicked out without a shred of credible evidence presented? careful what you wish for liberals.... you won’t last two seconds in a real crisis, you never have before... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Koko78 said: Reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the attorney withdrew because Biden is pulling something that is unethical. I bet Hunter wishes he'd withdrawn... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 A political mag up here offers bounties of thousands for useful info as to why someone’s lawyer fired the client Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 11 minutes ago, Doc said: I bet Hunter wishes he'd withdrawn... At this point, Joe may be wishing he did as well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 I've been gone since just before the holiday. Is it over? Is he impeached? Did they provide the proof? Is Pence the new president? No? Not yet? Geez. It's almost like they don't have a case at all and are just trying to remove Trump from office because he beat Hillary. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Just now, IDBillzFan said: I've been gone since just before the holiday. Is it over? Is he impeached? Did they provide the proof? Is Pence the new president? No? Not yet? Geez. It's almost like they don't have a case at all and are just trying to remove Trump from office because he beat Hillary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 So what was this magic about Hillary that they have totally freaked out over her losing? seriously, where is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 2 hours ago, row_33 said: Hoho heehee haha its a liberal Dem family move along, they are totally above the law... ...he needs to have the case moved to Delaware where he can get a fair trial............... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 hour ago, IDBillzFan said: I've been gone since just before the holiday. Is it over? Is he impeached? Did they provide the proof? Is Pence the new president? No? Not yet? Geez. It's almost like they don't have a case at all and are just trying to remove Trump from office because he beat Hillary. he stopped their graft. Fixed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 2, 2019 Author Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 2, 2019 Author Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Hedge said: Only the out of touch DNC could come up with this idea... what's more boring and off putting for the average American to listen to than a bunch of self aggrandizing bureaucrats? A bunch of self aggrandizing lawyers. No one will watch this. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Only the out of touch DNC could come up with this idea... what's more boring and off putting for the average American to listen to than a bunch of self aggrandizing bureaucrats? A bunch of self aggrandizing lawyers. No one will watch this. I will. ? Edited December 2, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 2, 2019 Author Share Posted December 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I will. ? But that's for the good of others, and it's appreciated 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 12 minutes ago, Hedge said: Is this the part of the process where a bunch of 'scholars' tell the nation that we should proceed to a trial when NONE of the 'witnesses' can testify to having actually witnessed ANYTHING , or having ANY first hand knowledge of the events, or can even state a SINGLE crime that they believe was committed! This should make for some great theater. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 15 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Is this the part of the process where a bunch of 'scholars' tell the nation that we should proceed to a trial when NONE of the 'witnesses' can testify to having actually witnessed ANYTHING , or having ANY first hand knowledge of the events, or can even state a SINGLE crime that they believe was committed! This should make for some great theater. PishPosh! Enough with your "normal" standards of jurisprudence, peasant! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts