Jump to content

The Sham Impeachment Inquiry & Whistleblower Saga: A Race to Get Ahead of the OIG


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Ha! Like Sondland who had to change his testimony and said there was a quid pro quo! 

 

NO, He said he presumed there was

 

At the prompting of Democrats, the ambassador gave hours of testimony on some scheme he imagined was happening. But that testimony was mostly made up of secondhand or speculative claims. He testified that he “presumed” and “came to believe” that the administration was engaged in quid pro quo for certain investigations — providing no proof or new evidence. He also said his theories about why aid was withheld were a “guess.”

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/11/20/impeachment-hearing-gordon-sondland-bombshell-dud-editorials-debates/4254300002/

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

They can't. 

 

Their own base would eat them if they did. 

 

Which is what happens when you feed that base lies for three years about Nazis in the street and a Trump/Putin conspiracy. 

 

They're going to be destroyed from within by their own prog-fascist base. And it'll be a joy to watch.

 

****************

 

 

Page to download the report from

 

THE TRUMP-UKRAINE IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY REPORT

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gary M said:

 

NO, He said he presumed there was

 

At the prompting of Democrats, the ambassador gave hours of testimony on some scheme he imagined was happening. But that testimony was mostly made up of secondhand or speculative claims. He testified that he “presumed” and “came to believe” that the administration was engaged in quid pro quo for certain investigations — providing no proof or new evidence. He also said his theories about why aid was withheld were a “guess.”

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/11/20/impeachment-hearing-gordon-sondland-bombshell-dud-editorials-debates/4254300002/

 

We had a direct like to Trump to commit the deed. He said there was a quid pro quo and he was backed up

by multiple witnesses. 

 

You would be fine with whatever Trump does. I just hope we get even and then some with you people. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

We had a direct like to Trump to commit the deed. He said there was a quid pro quo and he was backed up

by multiple witnesses. 

 

 

Name one of these witnesses and link to a quote of what they testified.

 

So two hours and no response from Tibs.

 

So let me help you.

 

William Taylor testified  that an aid told him that Sondland told him. Sorry that's not backing up Sondland, that's repeating the same source info.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/13/us/politics/impeachment-hearings.html

 

 

Edited by Gary M
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Criminals all. This is the Republican Party today 


If you can make a compelling or even coherent argument that Trump is a criminal, I’d be all ears. Seriously.  
 

Pro tip: it helps to have actual evidence to reference to indicate guilt of said crime. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...