Royale with Cheese Posted September 22, 2019 Share Posted September 22, 2019 Just now, HOUSE said: I am sure Rosehaus is still collecting his fees. At some point AB will fire him too. If Rosenhaus doesn’t let him go first. He’s not making money off of AB anymore after this....why put up with the headache? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUSE Posted September 22, 2019 Share Posted September 22, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Royale with Cheese said: If Rosenhaus doesn’t let him go first. He’s not making money off of AB anymore after this....why put up with the headache? AB loves the media circus, drops the retirement Tweet minutes before game time. His style is to create even more drama by dumping his agent right before Monday night football. " I FIRED THE MF" .. Edited September 22, 2019 by HOUSE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted September 22, 2019 Share Posted September 22, 2019 8 minutes ago, ALF said: AB might go this route Report: Monetary value of Colin Kaepernick settlement released "Colin Kaepernick and Eric Reid, the NFL stars who alleged the league’s teams colluded to keep them off the field after they led protests during the national anthem, will receive less than $10 million to settle grievances with the league, according to people briefed on the deal." https://247sports.com/nfl/san-francisco-49ers/Article/Colin-Kaepernick-settlement-amount-10-million--130346780/ ....effed up part is the NFL fraternity is a privilege and not a right......they are a singular employer.....and if they choose NOT to allow you entry into their fraternity, so what?......if a singular employer chooses not to hire you (a/k/a entry into their "fraternity"), how does that differ?....what a I missing here?........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoTom Posted September 22, 2019 Share Posted September 22, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, B-Man said: And in other news, this guy announced that he's no longer on the dating scene: Edited September 22, 2019 by WhoTom 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted September 22, 2019 Share Posted September 22, 2019 4 hours ago, Doc said: True, it's completely far-fetched to think that a guy who was cut for rape has other unsavory things in his past that were unearthed by a GM looking to potentially trade for him. Good one. You came around to Beane just kicking the tires on Brown but not wanting to give him any new money. I believe you called it "silly" to think that he'd do so. And only Beane's detectives could find this info.....come on doc. And I said any reservations Beane would have would be that AB quit on the Steelers, not some locker room issue with Poyer as many here laughably claimed would prevent Beane from ANY interest in AB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 22, 2019 Share Posted September 22, 2019 2 hours ago, Mr. WEO said: And only Beane's detectives could find this info.....come on doc. And I said any reservations Beane would have would be that AB quit on the Steelers, not some locker room issue with Poyer as many here laughably claimed would prevent Beane from ANY interest in AB. No, I'm sure other teams also looked into him, which is why there was no market for him and his contract demands except for Oakland, a dumb organization. Good thing for them Brown is even dumber, doing things to get his $30M in guarantees voided. But they lost high 3rd and 5th round picks that they won't be getting back. Although that might be a good thing with the way they've drafted... And I've been consistent from the beginning that Beane wasn't wiling to pay Brown and that that's why he didn't go to Buffalo. You said that he was willing to pay Brown well because otherwise he wouldn't have inquired but Brown refused them and that's been proven false. Your recent backtracking claiming that you never said that is funny. And whether he investigated him or not (again not unusual for GM's to investigate prospective players and obviously there was stuff in his background) and that factored into his decision or not is immaterial. But I realize that's all you have to go after so have at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted September 22, 2019 Share Posted September 22, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Doc said: No, I'm sure other teams also looked into him, which is why there was no market for him and his contract demands except for Oakland, a dumb organization. Good thing for them Brown is even dumber, doing things to get his $30M in guarantees voided. But they lost high 3rd and 5th round picks that they won't be getting back. Although that might be a good thing with the way they've drafted... And I've been consistent from the beginning that Beane wasn't wiling to pay Brown and that that's why he didn't go to Buffalo. You said that he was willing to pay Brown well because otherwise he wouldn't have inquired but Brown refused them and that's been proven false. Your recent backtracking claiming that you never said that is funny. And whether he investigated him or not (again not unusual for GM's to investigate prospective players and obviously there was stuff in his background) and that factored into his decision or not is immaterial. But I realize that's all you have to go after so have at it. Then why did you make that up? You have no info to back that up. And what do you mean "he wasn't willing to pay him"? He obviously wasn't going to give him crazy money, but he knew what the market for a top WR was. It would have cost Beane a big chunk of money (i.e. "paid Brown well") and there obviously was a price he would have paid. It just wasn't what AB wanted. None of this could be more simple. You're making less sense all the time, doc. You can't accept that, for the right price, this organization would have been happy to have crazy AB on the roster this off season. Edited September 22, 2019 by Mr. WEO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said: Then why did you make that up? You have no info to back that up. And what do you mean "he wasn't willing to pay him"? He obviously wasn't going to give him crazy money, but he knew what the market for a top WR was. It would have cost Beane a big chunk of money (i.e. "paid Brown well") and there obviously was a price he would have paid. It just wasn't what AB wanted. None of this could be more simple. You're making less sense all the time, doc. You can't accept that, for the right price, this organization would have been happy to have crazy AB on the roster this off season. You're "making it up" that Beane didn't do his job and investigate Brown, finding some other skeleton in his closet like, say, leaving a bad tip or throwing a thot off a party bus. Unless we know definitively either way, it's speculation. But again, he had a major skeleton in his closet and GM's investigate players they're thinking of acquiring. These aren't even debatable. Then again, I doubt the Raiders investigated and it's possible the Cheaters didn't either, depending on whether you believe the reports that Rosenhaus told them this was coming down the pike. But again it makes no difference to the main point I've been making all along which is that Beane didn't want to give Brown a new contract, which meant no new money, based on what he pulled in Pgh. So he, as you finally were forced to admit, just "kicked the tires," it went no further and there's no harm in that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 5 minutes ago, Doc said: You're "making it up" that Beane didn't do his job and investigate Brown, finding some other skeleton in his closet like, say, leaving a bad tip or throwing a thot off a party bus. Unless we know definitively either way, it's speculation. But again, he had a major skeleton in his closet and GM's investigate players they're thinking of acquiring. These aren't even debatable. Then again, I doubt the Raiders investigated and it's possible the Cheaters didn't either, depending on whether you believe the reports that Rosenhaus told them this was coming down the pike. But again it makes no difference to the main point I've been making all along which is that Beane didn't want to give Brown a new contract, which meant no new money, based on what he pulled in Pgh. So he, as you finally were forced to admit, just "kicked the tires," it went no further and there's no harm in that. Forced to admit....that the Bills didn't make an offer. That's obvious. I have no idea what you are going on about there. As for finding skeletons in his closet, no chance Beane was the only one who looked, let alone actually found anything like what came out recently. That never happened doc. Your claiming (very recently) that their research revealed "skeletons" that, along with not wanting too over pay was "probably" the reason Beane backed away is a joke. It's absurd. Then price was too high. Just leave it at that and do yourself less self harm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 13 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: Forced to admit....that the Bills didn't make an offer. That's obvious. I have no idea what you are going on about there. As for finding skeletons in his closet, no chance Beane was the only one who looked, let alone actually found anything like what came out recently. That never happened doc. Your claiming (very recently) that their research revealed "skeletons" that, along with not wanting too over pay was "probably" the reason Beane backed away is a joke. It's absurd. Then price was too high. Just leave it at that and do yourself less self harm. Ah, so now it's obvious that the Bills didn't make an offer, when before you were insistent that Beane wouldn't have tried to trade for him without knowing that Brown wanted significant guaranteed money and not the "no guaranteed money" I was telling you about and was later confirmed. You've become a pretzel, WEO. Extra salty, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 1 minute ago, Doc said: Ah, so now it's obvious that the Bills didn't make an offer, when before you were insistent that Beane wouldn't have tried to trade for him without knowing that Brown wanted significant guaranteed money and not the "no guaranteed money" I was telling you about and was later confirmed. You've become a pretzel, WEO. The Bills didn't make an offer to AB. Beane (and the world) knew AB wanted guaranteed money. 2 minutes ago, Doc said: Ah, so now it's obvious that the Bills didn't make an offer, when before you were insistent that Beane wouldn't have tried to trade for him without knowing that Brown wanted significant guaranteed money and not the "no guaranteed money" I was telling you about and was later confirmed. You've become a pretzel, WEO. Extra salty, of course. So incoherent, you said it twice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 Just now, Mr. WEO said: The Bills didn't make an offer to AB. Beane (and the world) knew AB wanted guaranteed money. The offer was "play under your existing contract," meaning no new money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 Just now, Doc said: The offer was "play under your existing contract," meaning no new money. It doesn't change the fact that Beane knew AB wanted guaranteed money on signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevewin Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 10 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: What a douche 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 13 hours ago, Mr. WEO said: It doesn't change the fact that Beane knew AB wanted guaranteed money on signing. I'm sure he did know. But that fact means little considering he didn't offer him any guaranteed money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said: He's going to be broke before the year is up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanNH Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 I won't lie I loved them signing him BEFORE everything came out. I was like pfft he gets us that 2nd stud WR. But after the aligations came out i was less supportive.. But DAMN how stupid do you have to be to send a threatening text when you KNOW its 1 strije and your out. ugh million dollar talent 2 cent brain, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts