BuffaloRebound Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 21 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: They only have 4 picks in the whole draft, and no 2nd rounder. So unless he falls to them at 27 overall in the 1st which is very unlikely i can’t see them moving up, unless they package next year’s 1st Or Frank Clark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 5, 2019 Author Share Posted April 5, 2019 4 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said: Or Frank Clark. Yeah, gotta pay Russ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 On 1/17/2019 at 2:41 PM, Happy Gilmore said: Can he be moved to edge rusher? A sub 300 lb DT...seems kind of small. Yes it would seem so, let alone at nose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloRebound Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 3 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Yeah, gotta pay Russ And Bobby Wagner who’s the Russell Wilson of their defense. Makes so much sense for Seahawks to swap Clark for an edge rusher on a rookie deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 40 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said: Seahawks... very interesting. They pounced on a tumbling Malik McDowell..........another underachieving but impressive physical specimen DT(from a Michigan school!) with their top pick in 2017...........so they might have a "type". Carroll definitely believes he can coach kid's up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 5, 2019 Author Share Posted April 5, 2019 Just now, BuffaloRebound said: And Bobby Wagner who’s the Russell Wilson of their defense. Makes so much sense for Seahawks to swap Clark for an edge rusher on a rookie deal. Would you do it? 9 for 27 and Clark? Dan Morgan is our dir of player personnel and was part of the FO who drafted him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloRebound Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Would you do it? 9 for 27 and Clark? Dan Morgan is our dir of player personnel and was part of the FO who drafted him. Yes. 9 for 21 and Clark. We have the cap space the next 3 years, and 21 is a better spot for WR/TE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 5, 2019 Author Share Posted April 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said: Yes. 9 for 21 and Clark. We have the cap space the next 3 years, and 21 is a better spot for WR/TE. Oops yes I meant 21. Yup we could get our edge guy and WR in 1st that way and then TE or DT at top of 2nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victory Formation Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 ***** Mel Kiper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 16 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Would you do it? 9 for 27 and Clark? Dan Morgan is our dir of player personnel and was part of the FO who drafted him. Yep and Yep Clarke is a stud....and 27 puts you in a position to get another impact player (Wilkins?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 5, 2019 Author Share Posted April 5, 2019 1 minute ago, John from Riverside said: Yep and Yep Clarke is a stud....and 27 puts you in a position to get another impact player (Wilkins?) Typo, they actually draft at 21 which is even better 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 Just now, YoloinOhio said: Typo, they actually draft at 21 which is even better Would still take WIlkins there if he drops..... Then trade up for a offensive weapon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 5, 2019 Author Share Posted April 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Would still take WIlkins there if he drops..... Then trade up for a offensive weapon? They have a huge hole at 3 tech so I would do that too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillyB Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 4 hours ago, BuffaloRebound said: Seahawks... very interesting. Dan Morgan effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat68 Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 I'm ok with just about anything other than Db, Oline or Rb at 9. Those are the positions lacking an elite option. I dont really want them to go "safe". I would rather they go for the most talented guy. Oliver, Gary, Metcalf, or Sweat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon Grundy Posted April 6, 2019 Share Posted April 6, 2019 6 hours ago, YoloinOhio said: Would you do it? 9 for 27 and Clark? Dan Morgan is our dir of player personnel and was part of the FO who drafted him. No way!! He'd be looking for D. Lawrence money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkep32 Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 Wont happen but I would like, Oliver, harry, and then zach allen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 18, 2019 Author Share Posted April 18, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocket94 Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 This is exactly what we need...disruptors. I do not see it with this current Bills group. They are not scaring anyone...marginal... We need an infusion of defensive players that get it done...go after people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon Grundy Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 There's concern about Montez Sweat heart too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts