Jump to content
26CornerBlitz

TNF: Eagles vs. Giants at 8:20 PM ET on NFLN, FOX, and Amazon Prime

Who Wins Tonight?  

37 members have voted

  1. 1. Who Wins Tonight?



Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, mannc said:

We’ll see.  Maybe the Giants didn’t particularly like Rosen, Allen or Darnold, and if none of those guys turns into a franchise QB, then they might have been right to pick Barkey, who is definitely living up to expectations.  But if the Giants aren’t able to get their QB of the future in this draft, they’re going to be seriously criticized, no matter how good Barkley is.

Giants will be picking top 5 in 2019 I would assume Manning is gone in 2020  They draft some OL help and good to go  On offense they have a stud RB, stud true #1 wr and what looks to be a stud TE though he was out last night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, apuszczalowski said:

And if anything, last nights game just lowered the offer the Eagles would have been willing to give the Bill's for McCoy. They arent desperate for another running back like Bill's fans might like to believe so why would they overpay? They know the Steelers would love to get rid of the Bell headache, and Buffalo loves dumping talent for cap space/deadcap money and draft picks. They make the call, find out what's the lowest they can obtain one of them for and sit still if it's too much.

 

I’d say it’s the opposite.  Eagles showed they are a contender despite Smallwood’s 18 carries for 51 yards and 1 fumble.  Bell or McCoy can put them over the hump.  I doubt they trade draft picks for a RB if they looked like crap and fell to 2-4.  If they want to challenge the Rams in NFC, they’re gonna need an upgrade over Smallwood.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

So Houston hasn't beat anyone impressive and lost to the Giants therefore the Bills should win. Got it.

  

no, no they haven't scotty. yes, yes they should win.

 

but I know, you don't really pull for the bills to win so I understand your sarcasm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

You can't say this team beat this team so we should beat them in the NFL. It doesn't work that way.

When a bad team beats someone that says a lot about the team who was beaten.  If Arizona were to beat Kansas City tomorrow a lot of people will be questioning whether or not KC is starting to decline.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BuffaloRebound said:

 

I’d say it’s the opposite.  Eagles showed they are a contender despite Smallwood’s 18 carries for 51 yards and 1 fumble.  Bell or McCoy can put them over the hump.  I doubt they trade draft picks for a RB if they looked like crap and fell to 2-4.  If they want to challenge the Rams in NFC, they’re gonna need an upgrade over Smallwood.  

I agree with this. After the first month, the Eagles now know that Wentz is back and that a repeat Super Bowl is a very realistic scenario. Smart teams in that position realize that you need to make those couple moves that can put you over the top. If not McCoy, it'll be Bell or some other somewhat lesser RB, but they're not going to stand pat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the Giants went out and spent a fortune on Nate Solder and drafted a G with the 34th pick.....and their OL is still horrible.  

 

Cautionary tale on how a good OL is more than just $$$ and high draft picks.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^^^

 

Too funny last night on group text with my fellow Spider STHs..3 of them HUGE Eagles fan..they were all praying Kyle did not come in against the Eagles..no right answer on who they were going to root for!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wentz threw 36 times and hit on 72% of them.  No INT's and only 1 sack.  That's some nice QB'ing.   

 

Ok, carry on...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, zow2 said:

Wentz threw 36 times and hit on 72% of them.  No INT's and only 1 sack.  That's some nice QB'ing.   

 

Ok, carry on...

 

That's why it's spelled Wentz instead on Wince. :beer:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×