Jump to content

Democratic 2020 Presidential Primary Thread


snafu

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So is it your new contention that some intel agencies concluded that Russia did not take steps to interfere in our election?

 

I didn’t think so. 

 

He won. Russia helped his cause. He’d almost certainly have won without their help. He didn’t collude. All these things can be true. It’s OK to admit #2. You can do it!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John Adams said:

So is it your new contention that some intel agencies concluded that Russia did not take steps to interfere in our election?

 

I didn’t think so. 

 

He won. Russia helped his cause. He’d almost certainly have won without their help. He didn’t collude. All these things can be true. It’s OK to admit #2. You can do it!

 

 

 

Looks like the laundromat has a new employee ????

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, John Adams said:

So is it your new contention that some intel agencies concluded that Russia did not take steps to interfere in our election?

 

 

No. My contention is that you passed off a lie that was debunked three years ago as fact — not because you’re dishonest but because you still haven’t bothered to do the work yourself on this topic. 

 

Thats not a new contention. You being uninformed and passing off IC lies as truth without knowing you’re being deceived is what you’ve been doing for a long long long LONG time. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

No. My contention is that you passed off a lie that was debunked three years ago as fact — not because you’re dishonest but because you still haven’t bothered to do the work yourself on this topic. 

 

Thats not a new contention. You being uninformed and passing off IC lies as truth without knowing you’re being deceived is what you’ve been doing for a long long long LONG time. ;)


Even your superhero Trump agreed that Russia tried to influence the election, but you can't admit that the IC report conclusion below was 100% right:

 

Quote

 

Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order, but these activities demonstrated a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations.

 

We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. 

 

 

The IC can have bad actors and the report's conclusions can still be right. You can't keep human duality in your head. The world isn't made of black and white heroes. Only your fiction writing gets to live in such an easy world. 

 

Russia worked to influence our election. Trump didn't collude. Both can be right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let there be no doubt that Russia fvcked with our elections and certainly the aftermath of the elections. Their goal was to denigrate Hillary when it looked like she would win and then denigrate Trump after he won. Even though they hated Hillary they sort of knew what they were getting with her. They didn't know what they were getting with Trump. Their ultimate goals were to get us fighting with each other and doubting the validity of the election, which they have far exceeded.  The democrats and media are willingly playing the useful fool for the Russians.

Edited by 3rdnlng
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Let there be no doubt that Russia fvcked with our elections and certainly the aftermath of the elections. There goal was to denigrate Hillary when it looked like she would win and then denigrate Trump after he won. Even though they hated Hillary they sort of knew what they were getting with her. They didn't know what they were getting with Trump. Their ultimate goals were to get us fighting with each other and doubting the validity of the election, which they have far exceeded.  The democrats and media are willingly playing the useful fool for the Russians.


Your last sentence is incomplete. Not that you would admit it, but the Dems have a dance partner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, John Adams said:


Even your superhero Trump agreed that Russia tried to influence the election, but you can't admit that the IC report conclusion below was 100% right:

 

You’re dodging. 

 

And everyone sees it. You stated all 17 intel agencies agreed in the ICA. That was false. 

 

You were wrong. Again. Full stop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, John Adams said:

I quoted the report.

 

But you didn't:

 

On 9/21/2019 at 7:02 PM, John Adams said:

The IC report listed 17 agencies that agreed that Russia interefered in our election.

 

The report does not say this. Never said it. The media said it said it, but the report did not. Hence the retractions (7 months after the hook had been set in the minds of the public -- a hook so deep that you still keep parroting it even though you've been shown several times now how it's not correct). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

But you didn't:

 

 

The report does not say this. Never said it. The media said it said it, but the report did not. Hence the retractions (7 months after the hook had been set in the minds of the public -- a hook so deep that you still keep parroting it even though you've been shown several times now how it's not correct). 

 

I quoted the report. It said unequivocally that Russia interfered in our election. That's never been retracted. Not by anyone. 

 

Get out of the conspiracy mindset. Russia did interfere. Can you admit that without saying Obama, Comey, Strzok, Deep State?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Trump is literally cancelling elections. 

 

Just saying there will be no primary elections in many states. That's right out of Putin playbook. Simply don't let the voters vote. 

 

 

Yawn. Enough with the Putin references already. That was so 2016.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, John Adams said:

 

I quoted the report.

 

After you repeated the lie about all 17 agencies having agreed in said report. Which is what I quoted above. 

 

You're wrong. Again. 

 

On the same subject you've been wrong about for three years (and had this same exact reaction -- denying you said it and shifting goalposts to a new argument no one is talking about). Next move: new handle for a few days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Your envy is obvious despite the falseness of your claims.  You dream to cancel elections where Republicans could triumph.  

Election cancelling envy? ?

Just now, 3rdnlng said:

So, you can't back up your claims? It is not my job to try to validate your preposterous contentions.

Do you not know how to google?

 

I bet you didn't even know this was true because your media sources just COVER UP for the president 

 

You never heard of the election cancelling, did you? Correct? 

You are ignorant of this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Election cancelling envy? ?

Do you not know how to google?

 

I bet you didn't even know this was true because your media sources just COVER UP for the president 

 

You never heard of the election cancelling, did you? Correct? 

You are ignorant of this 

HAHA Gator, your ignorance is growing rapidly. I am well aware that certain state GOP parties have decided it would be a waste of time to hold primaries in their state. You said that Trump cancelled them. I told you basically to prove it. Can you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

HAHA Gator, your ignorance is growing rapidly. I am well aware that certain state GOP parties have decided it would be a waste of time to hold primaries in their state. You said that Trump cancelled them. I told you basically to prove it. Can you?

So you do know about it. Why you asking then? 

 

Just to get my attention? ?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

So you do know about it. Why you asking then? 

 

Just to get my attention? ?

 

 

I know reading comprehension has never been your strong point, but if you can't see the distinction between what you said and how I responded and even explained it to you, then you should be castigated so your seed does not live on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A perfect example of why you are wasting your time Third.

 

34 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

You never heard of the election cancelling, did you? Correct? 

You are ignorant of this 

 

 

24 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

HAHA Gator, your ignorance is growing rapidly. I am well aware that certain state GOP parties have decided it would be a waste of time to hold primaries in their state.

 

You said that Trump cancelled them. I told you basically to prove it. Can you?

 

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So you do know about it. Why you asking then? 

Just to get my attention? ?

 

 

 

He ignores the truth about three states not holding their primaries, and that he declared it "Trump cancelling elections"

 

and projects attention seeking back on you, when that is all he is doing.

 

 

Just make fun of his silliness like the rest of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, B-Man said:

A perfect example of why you are wasting your time Third.

 

 

 

 

 

He ignores the truth about three states not holding their primaries, and that he declared it "Trump cancelling elections"

 

and projects attention seeking back on you, when that is all he is doing.

 

 

Just make fun of his silliness like the rest of us.

I thought that was what I was doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, B-Man said:

A perfect example of why you are wasting your time Third.

 

 

 

 

 

He ignores the truth about three states not holding their primaries, and that he declared it "Trump cancelling elections"

 

and projects attention seeking back on you, when that is all he is doing.

 

 

Just make fun of his silliness like the rest of us.

Oh, so it's not Trump? Ya right. It's Trump

 

 

 

It's Trump. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Trump is literally cancelling elections. 

 

Just saying there will be no primary elections in many states. That's right out of Putin playbook. Simply don't let the voters vote. 

 

 

 

Eliminate the opposition in your party, and then eliminate the opposition. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

After you repeated the lie about all 17 agencies having agreed in said report. Which is what I quoted above. 

 

You're wrong. Again. 

 

On the same subject you've been wrong about for three years (and had this same exact reaction -- denying you said it and shifting goalposts to a new argument no one is talking about). Next move: new handle for a few days.

 

You hate that quote. Can't even acknowledge that it's right and always has been. 

 

The world is following your posts: Make sure you're next one is a winner!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

You hate that quote. Can't even acknowledge that it's right and always has been. 

 

 

Wait, your position is that all 17 intelligence agencies agreed with the ICA's findings?

 

...Still?

 

Or are we still being dishonest and pretending that's not what you said and what I was referring to?

On 9/21/2019 at 7:02 PM, John Adams said:

The IC report listed 17 agencies that agreed that Russia interefered in our election.

 

Here's the quote -- from you. 

 

This is incorrect information. Long proven to be a lie. 

 

And here you are pushing it again. Because you never bothered to understand that it was a lie, why it was a lie, and how that matters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...