Jump to content

Welcome back Ike Boettger


Roundybout

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, purple haze said:

The coaches know the scheme before the draft.  If they draft players who cannot execute that they are incompetent at their job.  Teller is a fifth round pick for a reason.  Perhaps he needs seasoning.  I would guess he flashes, but is too inconsistent in the practice setting.

 

I suppose I was more thinking of Miller, who garnered “most improved” guard his 2nd year with Kromer, but lived on the bench last season.  Once again it seems like coaching which can’t take advantage of players with different skills

 

I “get it” that Kromer wants guys who have the skills he wants for his scheme, but his buddy Ducasse can’t seem to do it either-and the FA guys they brought in kind of suck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I suppose I was more thinking of Miller, who garnered “most improved” guard his 2nd year with Kromer, but lived on the bench last season.  Once again it seems like coaching which can’t take advantage of players with different skills

 

I “get it” that Kromer wants guys who have the skills he wants for his scheme, but his buddy Ducasse can’t seem to do it either-and the FA guys they brought in kind of suck

I hear you but I would contend most players are system guys.  Like Gaines last year was good in zone but most of the league would not want him in a press and run scheme.  Yet he's a good player.

 

The  players who defy systems are the HOF or All Pro level players and they are few in number compared to the rest.  Every team is chasing after them which is why athletic "traits" seem to take precedence at draft time.  Allen wasn't the best QB compared to others, but that arm can do things that beats even the best game plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, purple haze said:

 

 

Yep.  Once people get fixated on a player it's hard to readjust their thinking.  Sunday Groy and Miller were the worst, yet i keep hearing about Ducasse, and even Mills.  ??‍♂️

 

Ducasse and Mills have bad moments but it's not always them.  Both have gone games when they were decent/good.  That said, they would be perfect swing backups.

 

You are right, they are backup type players.  Problem is the whole line (with maybe the exception of Dawkins) are backups.

Groy has only started a couple of handfuls of games at both C and G.  No way to know if he can get better or he is near his ceiling.

Miller is not showing anything.

There is no interior "anchor" on this line and until the Bills find one defenses will exploit them.

 

Wait until next year when the Bills try to resign Mills in FA, this board will go crazy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

You are right, they are backup type players.  Problem is the whole line (with maybe the exception of Dawkins) are backups.

Groy has only started a couple of handfuls of games at both C and G.  No way to know if he can get better or he is near his ceiling.

Miller is not showing anything.

There is no interior "anchor" on this line and until the Bills find one defenses will exploit them.

 

Wait until next year when the Bills try to resign Mills in FA, this board will go crazy.

 

I wouldn't mind Mills back as long as the Bills bring in legit starting caliber players through the draft and Free Agency to compete.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I suppose I was more thinking of Miller, who garnered “most improved” guard his 2nd year with Kromer, but lived on the bench last season.  Once again it seems like coaching which can’t take advantage of players with different skills

 

I “get it” that Kromer wants guys who have the skills he wants for his scheme, but his buddy Ducasse can’t seem to do it either-and the FA guys they brought in kind of suck

Sometimes I think coaching is a bit overrated.  Ultimately talent wins.  I do think o line coaches seem to make a difference more than other positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, NewEra said:

Would anyone be upset if we cut Philip Gaines?  When I saw this thread I immediately hoped that we had cut him in order to pickup Boettger 

From the All-22 linked in this thread:

Cornerback Tre'Davious White was outstanding against the Ravens and didn't give Joe Flacco anything all game long. And hey, even Phillip Gaines played relatively well. Yes, I'm shocked, too. He gave up one big reception on a flag route and then had a touchdown caught over his head, but the rest of the time he was reasonably stable in coverage and a sound tackler. He wasn't at Shareece Wright levels or anything like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

From the All-22 linked in this thread:

 

 

Thx for the info.  Good to hear i suppose.  Just seems like every 3rd down they targeted his side of the field. Maybe not his section of the zone but always in his vicinity.  That soft spot in the zone above the nickel and below the safety outside of the hashes.  

 

i believe McD knows how to coach a good d but it’s so frustrating watching that 3rd down after 3rd down being completed to that spot in the zone while we rush 4 guys and get zero pressure.  If we get the number one pick I’d really like to land Ed Oliver.  Adding that dominating interior pass rush changes the entire defense.  Our pass rush is so bad

Edited by NewEra
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, purple haze said:

I hear you but I would contend most players are system guys.  Like Gaines last year was good in zone but most of the league would not want him in a press and run scheme.  Yet he's a good player.

 

The  players who defy systems are the HOF or All Pro level players and they are few in number compared to the rest.  Every team is chasing after them which is why athletic "traits" seem to take precedence at draft time.  Allen wasn't the best QB compared to others, but that arm can do things that beats even the best game plans.

 

Valid.

 

I'm thinking though, of Wade Phillips saying to the effect "if you have a good player, but he doesn't fit in your system, maybe the problem is your system".

Now many a coach pays lip service to that concept, but I'm thinking that the coaches who actually live it, are the ones who are ultimately most successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Valid.

 

I'm thinking though, of Wade Phillips saying to the effect "if you have a good player, but he doesn't fit in your system, maybe the problem is your system".

Now many a coach pays lip service to that concept, but I'm thinking that the coaches who actually live it, are the ones who are ultimately most successful.

Wade makes a good point.  I think a lot of coaches adjust to a degree; for instance, last season the run game changed when the Bills went back to more power focused runs.  That worked for what the line did better and Shady being a system defying player it worked.   I think a lot of coaches adjust plays, schemes, but there's only so much they can do.

 

they want to play a certain way and will keep bringing in players who can execute their vision.  Players who they find cannot will be weeded out.

Edited by purple haze
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, purple haze said:

Wade makes a good point.  I think a lot of coaches adjust to a degree; for instance, last season the run game changed when the Bills went back to more power focused runs.  That worked for what the line did better and Shady being a system defying player it worked.   I think a lot of coaches adjust plays, schemes, but there's only so much they can do.

 

they want to play a certain way and will keep bringing in players who can execute their vision.  Players who they find cannot will be weeded out.

 

I get that, but I suppose overall, I wonder if it can ever be a long-term successful NFL philosophy. 

 

Let's say you're drafting at a specific slot.  There's a hierarchy:

1. -most talented player at that slot

2.       -most talented player at that slot at a position you need

3.                -most talented player at that slot at a position you need, who can play well in the specific scheme or with the specific subset of skills you need

 

Complicating the issue may be that limitations in specific college offenses and defenses may make it harder to distinguish 2. from 3.

 

It certainly seems like a significant organizational talent advantage if you can roll with 1 or 2 and not worry about 3 so much

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I get that, but I suppose overall, I wonder if it can ever be a long-term successful NFL philosophy. 

 

Let's say you're drafting at a specific slot.  There's a hierarchy:

1. -most talented player at that slot

2.       -most talented player at that slot at a position you need

3.                -most talented player at that slot at a position you need, who can play well in the specific scheme or with the specific subset of skills you need

 

Complicating the issue may be that limitations in specific college offenses and defenses may make it harder to distinguish 2. from 3.

 

It certainly seems like a significant organizational talent advantage if you can roll with 1 or 2 and not worry about 3 so much

 

Good point.  But with so much pressure  I think coaches want things their way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Valid.

 

I'm thinking though, of Wade Phillips saying to the effect "if you have a good player, but he doesn't fit in your system, maybe the problem is your system".

Now many a coach pays lip service to that concept, but I'm thinking that the coaches who actually live it, are the ones who are ultimately most successful.

Well, when Wade Phillips is setting the bar...
BTW i hold him in very very high regard : )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...