LeSean McCoy Sued by Ex-Girlfriend Delicia Cordon - Now Making Accusations of Being Physically Abused

[x-BillzeBubba]

I remember her lawyer saying in a statement that they were not accusing LM, but that they had suspicions that he was involved somehow....and now, a month later, they contend the assaulter told them he was connected to him?  Total BS, and the police reports made no mention of it either?

Edited August 13, 2018 by x-BillzeBubba
more

[Rocky Landing]

13 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

None of that will show or prove to any standard that McCoy knew the attacker.  There is zero evidence of that unless she has a recording of the attacker stating that or they apprehend him.   She has nodda!

Again, her testimony, and that of her cousin is, by definition, evidence. 

 

Perhaps you would require a recording, or some other hard evidence. There is nothing that requires the jury to require such. They could find for the plaintiff based solely on her testimony, and circumstantial evidence. It happens all the time.

Edited August 13, 2018 by Rocky Landing

[wppete]

2 minutes ago, x-BillzeBubba said:

I remember her lawyer saying in a statement that they were not accusing LM, but that they had suspicions that he was involved somehow....and now, a month later, they contend the assaulter told them he was connected to him?  Total BS

 

Never believe or trust anything a lawyer says. Professional liars. 

[Real McClappy]

6 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said:

Again, her testimony, and that of her cousin is, by definition, evidence. 

 

Perhaps you would require a recording, or some other hard evidence. There is nothing that requires the jury to require such. They could find for the plaintiff based solely on her testimony, and circumstantial evidence. It happens all the time.

 

Edited August 13, 2018 by Real McCoy

[26CornerBlitz]

6 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said:

Again, her testimony, and that of her cousin is, by definition, evidence. 

 

Perhaps you would require a recording, or some other hard evidence. There is nothing that requires the jury to require such. They could find for the plaintiff based solely on hearsay, and circumstantial evidence. It happens all the time.

 

Anyone can say anything in court, but judges will certainly instruct a civil jury to apply the burden of proof standard.  The claim of McCoy knowing the unidentified attacker who remains at large is weak regardless of her claim potentially her cousin stating that as well.  

Edited August 13, 2018 by 26CornerBlitz

[Doc]

All he has to do at the civil trial is say that he wasn’t involved and that that is supported by the fact that the police have not found any tie to him.  So then she has proven nothing.

[GoBills808]

Glad the crack TBD legal team is on this one.

[Rocky Landing]

2 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Anyone can say anything in court, but judges will certainly instruct a civil jury to apply the burden of proof standard.  The claim of McCoy knowing the unidentified attacker who remains at large is weak regardless of her claim potentially her cousin stating that as well.  

Are you suggesting that the judge would instruct a jury not to believe her sworn testimony???

[26CornerBlitz]

Just now, Rocky Landing said:

Are you suggesting that the judge would instruct a jury not to believe her sworn testimony???

 

I posted exactly what I meant.  Apply the burden of proof standard as required in a civil case.  

[wppete]

[26CornerBlitz]

 

[Abill in Denver]

Thanks for looking out for his kid and dog...2 years later...high character B word

[26CornerBlitz]

Just now, Abill in Denver said:

Thanks for looking out for his kid and dog...2 years later...high character B word

 

You just know she would have accepted a marriage proposal, but now he's a child and animal abuser. 

[RaoulDuke79]

BYE.....Delicia!!!!

[Rocky Landing]

Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

I posted exactly what I meant.  Apply the burden of proof standard as required in a civil case.  

That's pretty much exactly what I'm saying. Unfortunately, the standard for burden of proof in a civil case is whether or not the jury believes her story. That's it. 

If they find her just slightly more believable than him, even on testimony alone, that is enough to satisfy the standard of proof in a civil trial.

[keepthefaith]

3 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

BYE.....Delicia!!!!

 

She's essentially a hooker.  You don't pay for the sex.  You pay for the woman to go away once it's over. 

[YoloinOhio]

 

[26CornerBlitz]

1 minute ago, Rocky Landing said:

That's pretty much exactly what I'm saying. Unfortunately, the standard for burden of proof in a civil case is whether or not the jury believes her story. That's it. 

If they find her just slightly more believable than him, even on testimony alone, that is enough to satisfy the standard of proof in a civil trial.

 

There has to be some factual basis.  Offering heresay isn't very convincing "evidence".

 

In a civil trial, the plaintiff's BURDEN OF PROOF is the PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE standard, which means that the plaintiff must convince the trier of fact that the evidence in support of his case outweighs the evidence offered by the defendant to oppose it.

 

[Rocky Landing]

27 minutes ago, Real McCoy said:

 

How many times do you think Judge Judy has decided civil cases on her show based on testimony?

 

8 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

There has to be some factual basis.  Offering heresay isn't very convincing "evidence".

 

In a civil trial, the plaintiff's BURDEN OF PROOF is the PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE standard, which means that the plaintiff must convince the trier of fact that the evidence in support of his case outweighs the evidence offered by the defendant to oppose it.

 

Right. We are in agreement.

Edited August 13, 2018 by Rocky Landing

[Doc]

So now it’s multiple attackers instead of one and all of the jewelry given to her by Shady was stolen instead of the attacker believing her when she said the jewelry was in a safe deposit box? Yes, that’s real credible.  Her lawyer is as dumb as she is.